<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool Energy&#039;s SolarHeart Brings Solar Power to Cold Climates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Savage</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/#comment-24498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Savage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3578#comment-24498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the links.  I&#039;d like to try to find/build some of these because where I live (San Diego) it would be a far better way to get off the grid than using carbon-emission-intensive photovoltaic cells]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links.  I&#8217;d like to try to find/build some of these because where I live (San Diego) it would be a far better way to get off the grid than using carbon-emission-intensive photovoltaic cells</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Savage</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/#comment-7569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Savage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3578#comment-7569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the links.  I&#039;d like to try to find/build some of these because where I live (San Diego) it would be a far better way to get off the grid than using carbon-emission-intensive photovoltaic cells]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links.  I&#8217;d like to try to find/build some of these because where I live (San Diego) it would be a far better way to get off the grid than using carbon-emission-intensive photovoltaic cells</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Weaver</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/#comment-7568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Weaver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3578#comment-7568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the capacity of the SolarFlow System, the engine is sized at 1.5kW peak power, and will operate about 30-40% of the hours of the year, depending on the number of collector panels, storage tank size, geographic location of the system, home heating load, etc.  During its operating times, the engine will not always produce to its peak capacity, so a system is estimated to generate between 2500 and 5000 kWh per year, with the bulk of the production occurring in the warmer months, when the heat is not needed in the home.  In the target markets, home electricity use averages 8000 - 10000 kWh per year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the capacity of the SolarFlow System, the engine is sized at 1.5kW peak power, and will operate about 30-40% of the hours of the year, depending on the number of collector panels, storage tank size, geographic location of the system, home heating load, etc.  During its operating times, the engine will not always produce to its peak capacity, so a system is estimated to generate between 2500 and 5000 kWh per year, with the bulk of the production occurring in the warmer months, when the heat is not needed in the home.  In the target markets, home electricity use averages 8000 &#8211; 10000 kWh per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Weaver</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/#comment-24497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Weaver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3578#comment-24497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the capacity of the SolarFlow System, the engine is sized at 1.5kW peak power, and will operate about 30-40% of the hours of the year, depending on the number of collector panels, storage tank size, geographic location of the system, home heating load, etc.  During its operating times, the engine will not always produce to its peak capacity, so a system is estimated to generate between 2500 and 5000 kWh per year, with the bulk of the production occurring in the warmer months, when the heat is not needed in the home.  In the target markets, home electricity use averages 8000 - 10000 kWh per year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the capacity of the SolarFlow System, the engine is sized at 1.5kW peak power, and will operate about 30-40% of the hours of the year, depending on the number of collector panels, storage tank size, geographic location of the system, home heating load, etc.  During its operating times, the engine will not always produce to its peak capacity, so a system is estimated to generate between 2500 and 5000 kWh per year, with the bulk of the production occurring in the warmer months, when the heat is not needed in the home.  In the target markets, home electricity use averages 8000 &#8211; 10000 kWh per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/#comment-7567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3578#comment-7567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cool Energy system is supposed to provide about 1.5kw of energy, so unless they have up-ed the size of the engine, then providing 60% of home energy would have to come from buying multiple units. Or they are expecting people of the future to make do with only 2.5kw, that in it&#039;s self might be a noble endeavor. Additional reporting at my site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cool Energy system is supposed to provide about 1.5kw of energy, so unless they have up-ed the size of the engine, then providing 60% of home energy would have to come from buying multiple units. Or they are expecting people of the future to make do with only 2.5kw, that in it&#8217;s self might be a noble endeavor. Additional reporting at my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/#comment-24496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3578#comment-24496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cool Energy system is supposed to provide about 1.5kw of energy, so unless they have up-ed the size of the engine, then providing 60% of home energy would have to come from buying multiple units. Or they are expecting people of the future to make do with only 2.5kw, that in it&#039;s self might be a noble endeavor. Additional reporting at my site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cool Energy system is supposed to provide about 1.5kw of energy, so unless they have up-ed the size of the engine, then providing 60% of home energy would have to come from buying multiple units. Or they are expecting people of the future to make do with only 2.5kw, that in it&#8217;s self might be a noble endeavor. Additional reporting at my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solar training</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/#comment-7566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[solar training]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3578#comment-7566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the flat plate tubes may be cheaper but they are nowhere near as effective as evacuated tubes]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the flat plate tubes may be cheaper but they are nowhere near as effective as evacuated tubes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solar training</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/#comment-24495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[solar training]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3578#comment-24495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the flat plate tubes may be cheaper but they are nowhere near as effective as evacuated tubes]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the flat plate tubes may be cheaper but they are nowhere near as effective as evacuated tubes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/#comment-7565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3578#comment-7565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For residential use - the following applies.



The solar panels by themselves will provide that much hot water - no need for this equipment for that service. I do that now with flat plate collectors in an active system which are much cheaper than the evacutated tube type.



The SolarHeart unit may do better at generating electricity in the summer months. Is it cost effective?



Sounds interesting but they provide practically no information on their web site that I could find. Only a few statements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For residential use &#8211; the following applies.</p>
<p>The solar panels by themselves will provide that much hot water &#8211; no need for this equipment for that service. I do that now with flat plate collectors in an active system which are much cheaper than the evacutated tube type.</p>
<p>The SolarHeart unit may do better at generating electricity in the summer months. Is it cost effective?</p>
<p>Sounds interesting but they provide practically no information on their web site that I could find. Only a few statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/cool-energys-solarheart-brings-solar-power-to-cold-climates/#comment-24494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3578#comment-24494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For residential use - the following applies.



The solar panels by themselves will provide that much hot water - no need for this equipment for that service. I do that now with flat plate collectors in an active system which are much cheaper than the evacutated tube type.



The SolarHeart unit may do better at generating electricity in the summer months. Is it cost effective?



Sounds interesting but they provide practically no information on their web site that I could find. Only a few statements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For residential use &#8211; the following applies.</p>
<p>The solar panels by themselves will provide that much hot water &#8211; no need for this equipment for that service. I do that now with flat plate collectors in an active system which are much cheaper than the evacutated tube type.</p>
<p>The SolarHeart unit may do better at generating electricity in the summer months. Is it cost effective?</p>
<p>Sounds interesting but they provide practically no information on their web site that I could find. Only a few statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
