UN Talks to Include Plan to Reduce Carbon Emissions of Aviation Industry

September 22nd, 2009 by Beth Graddon-Hodgson

The aviation industry and the emissions it produces were never included in the Kyoto Protocol that was established 12 years ago, but today at the New York meeting of the UN, there’s a new proposition that will require the international industry to reduce their carbon footprint. Currently, international aviation contributes 2% of the world’s carbon emissions, and this new agreement is set to rectify the industry’s initial omission from the Protocol.

The agreement which will be presented today, will involve the airlines, airports and aircraft companies working towards a mutual goal of cutting 2005’s emission levels by 50% by 2050. This move is the suggestion of British Airways Chief Executive Willie Walsh, and if this proposal is accepted at today’s gathering on climate change by the UN, it will be included on the agenda of the next meeting which will take place in Copenhagen in December. In addition to the overall goal of reducing the industry’s carbon emissions, this program will encourage all aviation competitors to reduce their footprint with a little bit of healthy competition. Already, The International Air Transport Association has agreed to reduce carbon emissions by 1.5% per year over the next decade so that the industry is more carbon neutral by 2020.

Since the goal of the current UN talk is to reduce global warming and its threat to developing countries, many in the airline industry are hoping that this will mark the milestone where the effects of the aviation industry will finally be recognized by the Kyoto Protocol to ensure major contributor to today’s carbon emissions and climate change can finally be regulated and curbed.

Via:Yahoo News

Image Via: Flickr user Zoagli with a Creative Commons License

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Tags: Aviation Emissions, Aviation Industry, Koyoto Protocol, UN Copenhagen, UN New York, United Nations

About the Author

Beth Graddon-Hodgson

bill

It’s a good job that the aviation emission was not included in the Kyoto Protocol, because if by selling more emissions could mitigate global warming, than selling hunger would benefit the poor. What a tautology.

The world consumes 30 billion barrels (4.8 km³) of oil per year, with developed nations being the largest consumer and preacher of global warming, while organic life forms being annihilate, its a religious dogma.

The same with solid waste, 400 million tons per annum now discharged in the Earth’s biosphere,with industrialized nations again the biggest contributor and preacher of recycling, whilst shipping millions of tons of solid waste to another geological cleft.

It’s good that in a vicious dose-dependent cycle, such amount of toxic waste affects global geochemical balances; further contribute to the shifting in climates and trophic levels (food chains) in the ecosystem, what a wise eclecticism
bill

It’s a good job that the aviation emission was not included in the Kyoto Protocol, because if by selling more emissions could mitigate global warming, than selling hunger would benefit the poor. What a tautology.

The world consumes 30 billion barrels (4.8 km³) of oil per year, with developed nations being the largest consumer and preacher of global warming, while organic life forms being annihilate, its a religious dogma.

The same with solid waste, 400 million tons per annum now discharged in the Earth’s biosphere,with industrialized nations again the biggest contributor and preacher of recycling, whilst shipping millions of tons of solid waste to another geological cleft.

It’s good that in a vicious dose-dependent cycle, such amount of toxic waste affects global geochemical balances; further contribute to the shifting in climates and trophic levels (food chains) in the ecosystem, what a wise eclecticism