<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mercury-Laden CFLs to Overwhelm Minnesota&#039;s Recycling Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/14/mercury-laden-cfls-to-overwhelm-minnesotas-recycling-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/14/mercury-laden-cfls-to-overwhelm-minnesotas-recycling-program/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_Wallace</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/14/mercury-laden-cfls-to-overwhelm-minnesotas-recycling-program/#comment-199884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob_Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2013 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3373#comment-199884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 100 incandescent replacement uses 23 watts.  You&#039;re saving 77 watts per hour.

Assume 4 hours a day, 365 a year, and you&#039;re saving 112.4 kWh per year. 
At the national average of 12.5 cents/kWh that&#039;s $14 per year.  Plus the cost of the 2 incandescent bulbs you didn&#039;t have to purchase.  How about we call it $15 per year?

That CFL is going to last at least 10 years (if you purchase a quality brand - I&#039;ve got some over 15 years old).  So $150+ - the cost of the bulb and recycling.

Plus there&#039;s the coal that won&#039;t get burned which means that there will be fewer coal pollution health problems to be treated with your tax dollars. 
And less mercury on our land and in our water which means fewer developmental problems with children, so less tax dollars spent.

I don&#039;t know about you, but even if it cost us $25 to recycle a CFL then I think it a very reasonable price to pay.

Of course you have the option to avoid CFLs and mercury and just use LEDs. Most likely there won&#039;t be any CFLs in our stores in five years or so, LEDs will replace them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 100 incandescent replacement uses 23 watts.  You&#8217;re saving 77 watts per hour.</p>
<p>Assume 4 hours a day, 365 a year, and you&#8217;re saving 112.4 kWh per year.<br />
At the national average of 12.5 cents/kWh that&#8217;s $14 per year.  Plus the cost of the 2 incandescent bulbs you didn&#8217;t have to purchase.  How about we call it $15 per year?</p>
<p>That CFL is going to last at least 10 years (if you purchase a quality brand &#8211; I&#8217;ve got some over 15 years old).  So $150+ &#8211; the cost of the bulb and recycling.</p>
<p>Plus there&#8217;s the coal that won&#8217;t get burned which means that there will be fewer coal pollution health problems to be treated with your tax dollars.<br />
And less mercury on our land and in our water which means fewer developmental problems with children, so less tax dollars spent.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but even if it cost us $25 to recycle a CFL then I think it a very reasonable price to pay.</p>
<p>Of course you have the option to avoid CFLs and mercury and just use LEDs. Most likely there won&#8217;t be any CFLs in our stores in five years or so, LEDs will replace them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/14/mercury-laden-cfls-to-overwhelm-minnesotas-recycling-program/#comment-199881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[al]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2013 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3373#comment-199881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I would like to know and cant find out is the true cost of the cfl bulb. I think I have seen it costs 3 times to to manufacture(now all done in China whereas the incandescent manufactured here) but how much does the state pay to dispose of the bulb (it is toxic waste after all) . Are we the taxpayers  subsidizing  a  $10 / $20 bulb and think we are a good deal because we save some on  our electric bill .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I would like to know and cant find out is the true cost of the cfl bulb. I think I have seen it costs 3 times to to manufacture(now all done in China whereas the incandescent manufactured here) but how much does the state pay to dispose of the bulb (it is toxic waste after all) . Are we the taxpayers  subsidizing  a  $10 / $20 bulb and think we are a good deal because we save some on  our electric bill .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: htl</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/14/mercury-laden-cfls-to-overwhelm-minnesotas-recycling-program/#comment-7508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[htl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3373#comment-7508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[every incandescent bulb cost you about $25 a year in electricity cost!



cfls life will vary depending on the manufacturer. Just because they are more efficient doesn&#039;t mean it is ok to still have them on all day long. they only last if you follow the manufactures instructions. They don&#039;t cost $15-20 for three. Go to ace hardware and get them to less then a buck! And cfls are a great step but if you don&#039;t like them then just conserve electricity. That doesn&#039;t cost you a thing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>every incandescent bulb cost you about $25 a year in electricity cost!</p>
<p>cfls life will vary depending on the manufacturer. Just because they are more efficient doesn&#8217;t mean it is ok to still have them on all day long. they only last if you follow the manufactures instructions. They don&#8217;t cost $15-20 for three. Go to ace hardware and get them to less then a buck! And cfls are a great step but if you don&#8217;t like them then just conserve electricity. That doesn&#8217;t cost you a thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: htl</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/14/mercury-laden-cfls-to-overwhelm-minnesotas-recycling-program/#comment-24264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[htl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3373#comment-24264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[every incandescent bulb cost you about $25 a year in electricity cost!



cfls life will vary depending on the manufacturer. Just because they are more efficient doesn&#039;t mean it is ok to still have them on all day long. they only last if you follow the manufactures instructions. They don&#039;t cost $15-20 for three. Go to ace hardware and get them to less then a buck! And cfls are a great step but if you don&#039;t like them then just conserve electricity. That doesn&#039;t cost you a thing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>every incandescent bulb cost you about $25 a year in electricity cost!</p>
<p>cfls life will vary depending on the manufacturer. Just because they are more efficient doesn&#8217;t mean it is ok to still have them on all day long. they only last if you follow the manufactures instructions. They don&#8217;t cost $15-20 for three. Go to ace hardware and get them to less then a buck! And cfls are a great step but if you don&#8217;t like them then just conserve electricity. That doesn&#8217;t cost you a thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/14/mercury-laden-cfls-to-overwhelm-minnesotas-recycling-program/#comment-7507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3373#comment-7507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with CFLs is that they don&#039;t last anywhere near as long as they&#039;re advertised to last.  Every single person I know who bought into them (including myself) says the same thing:  They only last a couple of years and then burn out, nowhere near the 7 years advertised on the package.  I don&#039;t mind replacing a bulb every couple of years for less than a dollar, but when they charge $15-$20 for a pack of two or three, it&#039;s just not worth it.  That&#039;s not even considering the obnoxious &quot;warm-up&quot; time that most of them have and the onerous recycling requirements.  I&#039;m really hoping LEDs become affordable soon because I&#039;m sick of CFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with CFLs is that they don&#8217;t last anywhere near as long as they&#8217;re advertised to last.  Every single person I know who bought into them (including myself) says the same thing:  They only last a couple of years and then burn out, nowhere near the 7 years advertised on the package.  I don&#8217;t mind replacing a bulb every couple of years for less than a dollar, but when they charge $15-$20 for a pack of two or three, it&#8217;s just not worth it.  That&#8217;s not even considering the obnoxious &#8220;warm-up&#8221; time that most of them have and the onerous recycling requirements.  I&#8217;m really hoping LEDs become affordable soon because I&#8217;m sick of CFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/14/mercury-laden-cfls-to-overwhelm-minnesotas-recycling-program/#comment-24263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3373#comment-24263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with CFLs is that they don&#039;t last anywhere near as long as they&#039;re advertised to last.  Every single person I know who bought into them (including myself) says the same thing:  They only last a couple of years and then burn out, nowhere near the 7 years advertised on the package.  I don&#039;t mind replacing a bulb every couple of years for less than a dollar, but when they charge $15-$20 for a pack of two or three, it&#039;s just not worth it.  That&#039;s not even considering the obnoxious &quot;warm-up&quot; time that most of them have and the onerous recycling requirements.  I&#039;m really hoping LEDs become affordable soon because I&#039;m sick of CFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with CFLs is that they don&#8217;t last anywhere near as long as they&#8217;re advertised to last.  Every single person I know who bought into them (including myself) says the same thing:  They only last a couple of years and then burn out, nowhere near the 7 years advertised on the package.  I don&#8217;t mind replacing a bulb every couple of years for less than a dollar, but when they charge $15-$20 for a pack of two or three, it&#8217;s just not worth it.  That&#8217;s not even considering the obnoxious &#8220;warm-up&#8221; time that most of them have and the onerous recycling requirements.  I&#8217;m really hoping LEDs become affordable soon because I&#8217;m sick of CFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
