<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Must Socialize Grid to Add Renewable Energy, Study Finds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/#comment-7438</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3329#comment-7438</guid>
		<description>I live in India. It is a semi socialist state with flourishing free market. The market there is so big that it allows fair competition (infinite buyers and near infinite sellers). Infinite buyers allow economies of scale too. To top it there is strong regulation. Our banks did not collapse. Our telephone companies offer the cheapest calls on earth. The public sector companies are used as tools to bring down price still nurturing competition. Airlines compete with Indian Railways. Telecom companies compete with state owned BSNL which makes profit. There is no subsidy. There is only one place on earth where there is perfect free market economy (wrongly called capitalism). It is the city fish markets around the world. Random thoughts but point we state players and regulators are necessary environment for market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in India. It is a semi socialist state with flourishing free market. The market there is so big that it allows fair competition (infinite buyers and near infinite sellers). Infinite buyers allow economies of scale too. To top it there is strong regulation. Our banks did not collapse. Our telephone companies offer the cheapest calls on earth. The public sector companies are used as tools to bring down price still nurturing competition. Airlines compete with Indian Railways. Telecom companies compete with state owned BSNL which makes profit. There is no subsidy. There is only one place on earth where there is perfect free market economy (wrongly called capitalism). It is the city fish markets around the world. Random thoughts but point we state players and regulators are necessary environment for market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/#comment-24236</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3329#comment-24236</guid>
		<description>I live in India. It is a semi socialist state with flourishing free market. The market there is so big that it allows fair competition (infinite buyers and near infinite sellers). Infinite buyers allow economies of scale too. To top it there is strong regulation. Our banks did not collapse. Our telephone companies offer the cheapest calls on earth. The public sector companies are used as tools to bring down price still nurturing competition. Airlines compete with Indian Railways. Telecom companies compete with state owned BSNL which makes profit. There is no subsidy. There is only one place on earth where there is perfect free market economy (wrongly called capitalism). It is the city fish markets around the world. Random thoughts but point we state players and regulators are necessary environment for market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in India. It is a semi socialist state with flourishing free market. The market there is so big that it allows fair competition (infinite buyers and near infinite sellers). Infinite buyers allow economies of scale too. To top it there is strong regulation. Our banks did not collapse. Our telephone companies offer the cheapest calls on earth. The public sector companies are used as tools to bring down price still nurturing competition. Airlines compete with Indian Railways. Telecom companies compete with state owned BSNL which makes profit. There is no subsidy. There is only one place on earth where there is perfect free market economy (wrongly called capitalism). It is the city fish markets around the world. Random thoughts but point we state players and regulators are necessary environment for market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/#comment-7437</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3329#comment-7437</guid>
		<description>Nicholas. I was kidding in my title, riffing off the current national furor over any kind of national Common Good right now as some kind of &quot;socialist plot&quot;.



A national grid infrastructure is no more socialist than national highways, railroads, pipelines, water supply infrastructure, etc.



As a nation we will grind to a halt without them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas. I was kidding in my title, riffing off the current national furor over any kind of national Common Good right now as some kind of &#8220;socialist plot&#8221;.</p>
<p>A national grid infrastructure is no more socialist than national highways, railroads, pipelines, water supply infrastructure, etc.</p>
<p>As a nation we will grind to a halt without them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/#comment-24235</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3329#comment-24235</guid>
		<description>Nicholas. I was kidding in my title, riffing off the current national furor over any kind of national Common Good right now as some kind of &quot;socialist plot&quot;.



A national grid infrastructure is no more socialist than national highways, railroads, pipelines, water supply infrastructure, etc.



As a nation we will grind to a halt without them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas. I was kidding in my title, riffing off the current national furor over any kind of national Common Good right now as some kind of &#8220;socialist plot&#8221;.</p>
<p>A national grid infrastructure is no more socialist than national highways, railroads, pipelines, water supply infrastructure, etc.</p>
<p>As a nation we will grind to a halt without them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/#comment-7436</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3329#comment-7436</guid>
		<description>Aren’t we supposed to be social animals?  What’s wrong with Socialism anyway, as long as it doesn’t become abusive and turn into Communism?  As a matter of fact it can and shall coexist in harmony with Capitalism, as the inevitable two sides of the same coin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren’t we supposed to be social animals?  What’s wrong with Socialism anyway, as long as it doesn’t become abusive and turn into Communism?  As a matter of fact it can and shall coexist in harmony with Capitalism, as the inevitable two sides of the same coin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/#comment-24234</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3329#comment-24234</guid>
		<description>Aren’t we supposed to be social animals?  What’s wrong with Socialism anyway, as long as it doesn’t become abusive and turn into Communism?  As a matter of fact it can and shall coexist in harmony with Capitalism, as the inevitable two sides of the same coin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren’t we supposed to be social animals?  What’s wrong with Socialism anyway, as long as it doesn’t become abusive and turn into Communism?  As a matter of fact it can and shall coexist in harmony with Capitalism, as the inevitable two sides of the same coin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/#comment-7435</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3329#comment-7435</guid>
		<description>Inquisitive - incredibly long pdf source for this story is the link at end of story - should have some more detail on China, UK.



Hope we do find a solution here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inquisitive &#8211; incredibly long pdf source for this story is the link at end of story &#8211; should have some more detail on China, UK.</p>
<p>Hope we do find a solution here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/#comment-24233</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3329#comment-24233</guid>
		<description>Inquisitive - incredibly long pdf source for this story is the link at end of story - should have some more detail on China, UK.



Hope we do find a solution here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inquisitive &#8211; incredibly long pdf source for this story is the link at end of story &#8211; should have some more detail on China, UK.</p>
<p>Hope we do find a solution here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inquisitive</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/#comment-7434</link>
		<dc:creator>Inquisitive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3329#comment-7434</guid>
		<description>Thanks Susan,

an interesting article.  Links to further reading on how the UK and China accomplished their changes would be most useful.



Also, I wonder whether -- as an interim step before nationalization, and in a bow to property rights and profit motives -- the Government might change its accounting rules to re-allow Pooling-of-Interest accounting treatments for mergers in the energy transmission sector?  This change (and some others) would likely go a long way toward promoting mergers among transmission providers.  In this way, the government could end up with a much reduced number of players, making any future regulation/cooperation/nationalization easier.  It might eliminate a source of tax revenue for the government on the mergers, but so what -- what it really wants is the creation of fewer, merged entities, not more tax revenue.

Just a thought</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Susan,</p>
<p>an interesting article.  Links to further reading on how the UK and China accomplished their changes would be most useful.</p>
<p>Also, I wonder whether &#8212; as an interim step before nationalization, and in a bow to property rights and profit motives &#8212; the Government might change its accounting rules to re-allow Pooling-of-Interest accounting treatments for mergers in the energy transmission sector?  This change (and some others) would likely go a long way toward promoting mergers among transmission providers.  In this way, the government could end up with a much reduced number of players, making any future regulation/cooperation/nationalization easier.  It might eliminate a source of tax revenue for the government on the mergers, but so what &#8212; what it really wants is the creation of fewer, merged entities, not more tax revenue.</p>
<p>Just a thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inquisitive</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/12/us-must-socialize-grid-to-add-renewable-energy-study-finds/#comment-24232</link>
		<dc:creator>Inquisitive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3329#comment-24232</guid>
		<description>Thanks Susan,

an interesting article.  Links to further reading on how the UK and China accomplished their changes would be most useful.



Also, I wonder whether -- as an interim step before nationalization, and in a bow to property rights and profit motives -- the Government might change its accounting rules to re-allow Pooling-of-Interest accounting treatments for mergers in the energy transmission sector?  This change (and some others) would likely go a long way toward promoting mergers among transmission providers.  In this way, the government could end up with a much reduced number of players, making any future regulation/cooperation/nationalization easier.  It might eliminate a source of tax revenue for the government on the mergers, but so what -- what it really wants is the creation of fewer, merged entities, not more tax revenue.

Just a thought</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Susan,</p>
<p>an interesting article.  Links to further reading on how the UK and China accomplished their changes would be most useful.</p>
<p>Also, I wonder whether &#8212; as an interim step before nationalization, and in a bow to property rights and profit motives &#8212; the Government might change its accounting rules to re-allow Pooling-of-Interest accounting treatments for mergers in the energy transmission sector?  This change (and some others) would likely go a long way toward promoting mergers among transmission providers.  In this way, the government could end up with a much reduced number of players, making any future regulation/cooperation/nationalization easier.  It might eliminate a source of tax revenue for the government on the mergers, but so what &#8212; what it really wants is the creation of fewer, merged entities, not more tax revenue.</p>
<p>Just a thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

