<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New EnergyStar Standards Released for Televisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/new-energystar-standards-released-for-televisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/new-energystar-standards-released-for-televisions/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sevdalina Peeva</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/new-energystar-standards-released-for-televisions/#comment-7370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sevdalina Peeva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3331#comment-7370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There are about 275 million TVs currently in use in the U.S., consuming over 50 billion kWh of energy each year&quot; - would You please check your numbers? 50 000 kW seems to be wrong...may be not...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are about 275 million TVs currently in use in the U.S., consuming over 50 billion kWh of energy each year&#8221; &#8211; would You please check your numbers? 50 000 kW seems to be wrong&#8230;may be not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sevdalina Peeva</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/new-energystar-standards-released-for-televisions/#comment-24240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sevdalina Peeva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3331#comment-24240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There are about 275 million TVs currently in use in the U.S., consuming over 50 billion kWh of energy each year&quot; - would You please check your numbers? 50 000 kW seems to be wrong...may be not...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are about 275 million TVs currently in use in the U.S., consuming over 50 billion kWh of energy each year&#8221; &#8211; would You please check your numbers? 50 000 kW seems to be wrong&#8230;may be not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/new-energystar-standards-released-for-televisions/#comment-7369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3331#comment-7369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still have a 26 year old tube TV, recycled from a curbside...



Although I am considering a Vizio Eco line LCD - Vizio VECO320L 32” LCD HDTV



Power Consumption 84W (average), 0.4W standby.



No I don&#039;t work for Vizio..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have a 26 year old tube TV, recycled from a curbside&#8230;</p>
<p>Although I am considering a Vizio Eco line LCD &#8211; Vizio VECO320L 32” LCD HDTV</p>
<p>Power Consumption 84W (average), 0.4W standby.</p>
<p>No I don&#8217;t work for Vizio..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/new-energystar-standards-released-for-televisions/#comment-24239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3331#comment-24239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still have a 26 year old tube TV, recycled from a curbside...



Although I am considering a Vizio Eco line LCD - Vizio VECO320L 32” LCD HDTV



Power Consumption 84W (average), 0.4W standby.



No I don&#039;t work for Vizio..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have a 26 year old tube TV, recycled from a curbside&#8230;</p>
<p>Although I am considering a Vizio Eco line LCD &#8211; Vizio VECO320L 32” LCD HDTV</p>
<p>Power Consumption 84W (average), 0.4W standby.</p>
<p>No I don&#8217;t work for Vizio..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Graddon-Hodgson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/new-energystar-standards-released-for-televisions/#comment-7368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Graddon-Hodgson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3331#comment-7368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for reading! I agree completely, we recently traded up from an old 24&quot; non-flat screen to a more efficient and slightly larger 37&quot;. I don&#039;t like watching huge TVs either, and hate the way they look in a room, but this size is great. Sales people are generally there just to tell you what you want to hear, which isn&#039;t necessarily consistent with valid information. Even before the new stickers are released and displayed on TVs, look for 50 inches or under at 109KW or less.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading! I agree completely, we recently traded up from an old 24&#8243; non-flat screen to a more efficient and slightly larger 37&#8243;. I don&#8217;t like watching huge TVs either, and hate the way they look in a room, but this size is great. Sales people are generally there just to tell you what you want to hear, which isn&#8217;t necessarily consistent with valid information. Even before the new stickers are released and displayed on TVs, look for 50 inches or under at 109KW or less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Graddon-Hodgson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/new-energystar-standards-released-for-televisions/#comment-24238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Graddon-Hodgson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3331#comment-24238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for reading! I agree completely, we recently traded up from an old 24&quot; non-flat screen to a more efficient and slightly larger 37&quot;. I don&#039;t like watching huge TVs either, and hate the way they look in a room, but this size is great. Sales people are generally there just to tell you what you want to hear, which isn&#039;t necessarily consistent with valid information. Even before the new stickers are released and displayed on TVs, look for 50 inches or under at 109KW or less.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading! I agree completely, we recently traded up from an old 24&#8243; non-flat screen to a more efficient and slightly larger 37&#8243;. I don&#8217;t like watching huge TVs either, and hate the way they look in a room, but this size is great. Sales people are generally there just to tell you what you want to hear, which isn&#8217;t necessarily consistent with valid information. Even before the new stickers are released and displayed on TVs, look for 50 inches or under at 109KW or less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Reader</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/new-energystar-standards-released-for-televisions/#comment-7367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[California Reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3331#comment-7367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this article.  My husband has been wanting to trade &quot;up&quot; to a much larger screen when the time comes to change our now 24&quot; set.  I have been resisting, based on environmental concerns, hoping that there may be a compromise possible through technical advances in the products.  I personally feel that the really big screens are unpleasant to watch, but now I have an actual set size to focus on should we be in a position to need to trade this one in.  I don&#039;t generally find sales people to be the best source on the topic when we shop, so other sources are critical when looking for energy using products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this article.  My husband has been wanting to trade &#8220;up&#8221; to a much larger screen when the time comes to change our now 24&#8243; set.  I have been resisting, based on environmental concerns, hoping that there may be a compromise possible through technical advances in the products.  I personally feel that the really big screens are unpleasant to watch, but now I have an actual set size to focus on should we be in a position to need to trade this one in.  I don&#8217;t generally find sales people to be the best source on the topic when we shop, so other sources are critical when looking for energy using products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Reader</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/11/new-energystar-standards-released-for-televisions/#comment-24237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[California Reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3331#comment-24237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this article.  My husband has been wanting to trade &quot;up&quot; to a much larger screen when the time comes to change our now 24&quot; set.  I have been resisting, based on environmental concerns, hoping that there may be a compromise possible through technical advances in the products.  I personally feel that the really big screens are unpleasant to watch, but now I have an actual set size to focus on should we be in a position to need to trade this one in.  I don&#039;t generally find sales people to be the best source on the topic when we shop, so other sources are critical when looking for energy using products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this article.  My husband has been wanting to trade &#8220;up&#8221; to a much larger screen when the time comes to change our now 24&#8243; set.  I have been resisting, based on environmental concerns, hoping that there may be a compromise possible through technical advances in the products.  I personally feel that the really big screens are unpleasant to watch, but now I have an actual set size to focus on should we be in a position to need to trade this one in.  I don&#8217;t generally find sales people to be the best source on the topic when we shop, so other sources are critical when looking for energy using products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
