<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World&#8217;s Most Efficient Solar Technology Coming Soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/#comment-109621</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3205#comment-109621</guid>
		<description>3 kW system for US$12,000.

Currently China is shipping solar panels for about $1 per watt.  (Apparently for less than $1/W.)

A 3 kW PV system would cost $3,000 + inverter and hardware.  Under $5,000 or less than half of the Stirling system.

It also would have no moving parts and and expected lifespan of 30, 40, 50+ years.  Almost no operating expenses.

You could get almost three times as much output from a PV system.  The price of PV has fallen so rapidly that it&#039;s knocking thermal solar out of contention.

--

Speaking of rural workshops, Sun Electric is selling &quot;laminates&quot; - solar panels without junction boxes and frames for $0.58/watt.  Gluing on a junction box, soldering a couple of wires, and building a simple frame is something that requires little equipment and could be done in a basic workshop.

$12,000 would buy over 20 kW of solar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 kW system for US$12,000.</p>
<p>Currently China is shipping solar panels for about $1 per watt.  (Apparently for less than $1/W.)</p>
<p>A 3 kW PV system would cost $3,000 + inverter and hardware.  Under $5,000 or less than half of the Stirling system.</p>
<p>It also would have no moving parts and and expected lifespan of 30, 40, 50+ years.  Almost no operating expenses.</p>
<p>You could get almost three times as much output from a PV system.  The price of PV has fallen so rapidly that it&#8217;s knocking thermal solar out of contention.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>Speaking of rural workshops, Sun Electric is selling &#8220;laminates&#8221; &#8211; solar panels without junction boxes and frames for $0.58/watt.  Gluing on a junction box, soldering a couple of wires, and building a simple frame is something that requires little equipment and could be done in a basic workshop.</p>
<p>$12,000 would buy over 20 kW of solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vipen Mahajan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/#comment-109607</link>
		<dc:creator>Vipen Mahajan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3205#comment-109607</guid>
		<description>Dec 2011 . What i the update. I have been studying Open Source ecology, i.e no patents/licenses etc. of a 40 sq meter, solar panels , made of smaller mirrors, which track the sun,, by hand, and can be made in a rural workshop, in developing countries. Approx cost Rs 150,000 (approx US$ 4000). Couple with a 3-5 HP Stirling engine, (cost approx Rs 300,000), i.e. about US$12,000 for a 3 kw, electrical power output. With hot water of about 5-10 KWe heat equivalent for heating etc.

We are working on the details, designs etc. International cooperation/collaboration welcome. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dec 2011 . What i the update. I have been studying Open Source ecology, i.e no patents/licenses etc. of a 40 sq meter, solar panels , made of smaller mirrors, which track the sun,, by hand, and can be made in a rural workshop, in developing countries. Approx cost Rs 150,000 (approx US$ 4000). Couple with a 3-5 HP Stirling engine, (cost approx Rs 300,000), i.e. about US$12,000 for a 3 kw, electrical power output. With hot water of about 5-10 KWe heat equivalent for heating etc.</p>
<p>We are working on the details, designs etc. International cooperation/collaboration welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar Energy Blowing Up, &#38; in Surprising Places! &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/#comment-96784</link>
		<dc:creator>Solar Energy Blowing Up, &#38; in Surprising Places! &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3205#comment-96784</guid>
		<description>[...] World’s Most Efficient Solar Technology Coming Early 2010 2) First Solar and China to Partner on Gigantic Solar Power Plant 3) $21 Billion Solar Power [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] World’s Most Efficient Solar Technology Coming Early 2010 2) First Solar and China to Partner on Gigantic Solar Power Plant 3) $21 Billion Solar Power [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/#comment-45047</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3205#comment-45047</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have info on how much they cost or how to aquire one of these?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have info on how much they cost or how to aquire one of these?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Smith João Pessoa, Brazil</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/#comment-6986</link>
		<dc:creator>James Smith João Pessoa, Brazil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3205#comment-6986</guid>
		<description>I lived in Arizona for 25 years and one thing I learned for sure.  If there is any way to screw something up, Phoenix will find it.  If there is no way, they will invent a way.



Stirling Energy Systems will discover for themselves they should have placed this in New Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lived in Arizona for 25 years and one thing I learned for sure.  If there is any way to screw something up, Phoenix will find it.  If there is no way, they will invent a way.</p>
<p>Stirling Energy Systems will discover for themselves they should have placed this in New Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Smith João Pessoa, Brazi</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/#comment-23972</link>
		<dc:creator>James Smith João Pessoa, Brazi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3205#comment-23972</guid>
		<description>I lived in Arizona for 25 years and one thing I learned for sure.  If there is any way to screw something up, Phoenix will find it.  If there is no way, they will invent a way.



Stirling Energy Systems will discover for themselves they should have placed this in New Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lived in Arizona for 25 years and one thing I learned for sure.  If there is any way to screw something up, Phoenix will find it.  If there is no way, they will invent a way.</p>
<p>Stirling Energy Systems will discover for themselves they should have placed this in New Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich EE</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/#comment-6985</link>
		<dc:creator>rich EE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3205#comment-6985</guid>
		<description>I also did the math and got exactly identical

results to PVinsights . 21.41 pcnt.

[based on 1 KW per square meter .]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also did the math and got exactly identical</p>
<p>results to PVinsights . 21.41 pcnt.</p>
<p>[based on 1 KW per square meter .]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich EE</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/#comment-23971</link>
		<dc:creator>rich EE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3205#comment-23971</guid>
		<description>I also did the math and got exactly identical

results to PVinsights . 21.41 pcnt.

[based on 1 KW per square meter .]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also did the math and got exactly identical</p>
<p>results to PVinsights . 21.41 pcnt.</p>
<p>[based on 1 KW per square meter .]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/#comment-6984</link>
		<dc:creator>MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3205#comment-6984</guid>
		<description>sailingsoul has a point...



You know what the dirty little secret behind smart meters is don&#039;t you?



Make a meter smart enough to figure out TOU and how many VA get pumped into your home, i.e. a 25W CFL may consume 50VA, how much harmonics are coming out of your house, and how poor your homes power factor is...



As a result your power utility can charge you for what time you ran anything with a motor (inductive device), how many VA your lights and appliances draw (not everything is a resistive load), how much harmonics your cheap appliances create, and how poor your homes power factor is...



All ways to take more of your $$$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sailingsoul has a point&#8230;</p>
<p>You know what the dirty little secret behind smart meters is don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Make a meter smart enough to figure out TOU and how many VA get pumped into your home, i.e. a 25W CFL may consume 50VA, how much harmonics are coming out of your house, and how poor your homes power factor is&#8230;</p>
<p>As a result your power utility can charge you for what time you ran anything with a motor (inductive device), how many VA your lights and appliances draw (not everything is a resistive load), how much harmonics your cheap appliances create, and how poor your homes power factor is&#8230;</p>
<p>All ways to take more of your $$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/25/worlds-most-efficient-solar-technology-coming-early-2010/#comment-23970</link>
		<dc:creator>MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3205#comment-23970</guid>
		<description>sailingsoul has a point...



You know what the dirty little secret behind smart meters is don&#039;t you?



Make a meter smart enough to figure out TOU and how many VA get pumped into your home, i.e. a 25W CFL may consume 50VA, how much harmonics are coming out of your house, and how poor your homes power factor is...



As a result your power utility can charge you for what time you ran anything with a motor (inductive device), how many VA your lights and appliances draw (not everything is a resistive load), how much harmonics your cheap appliances create, and how poor your homes power factor is...



All ways to take more of your $$$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sailingsoul has a point&#8230;</p>
<p>You know what the dirty little secret behind smart meters is don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Make a meter smart enough to figure out TOU and how many VA get pumped into your home, i.e. a 25W CFL may consume 50VA, how much harmonics are coming out of your house, and how poor your homes power factor is&#8230;</p>
<p>As a result your power utility can charge you for what time you ran anything with a motor (inductive device), how many VA your lights and appliances draw (not everything is a resistive load), how much harmonics your cheap appliances create, and how poor your homes power factor is&#8230;</p>
<p>All ways to take more of your $$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

