<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Energy Use Drops in 2008 [Infographics]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/17/us-energy-use-drops-in-2008-infographics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/17/us-energy-use-drops-in-2008-infographics/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lakosh</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/17/us-energy-use-drops-in-2008-infographics/#comment-6497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Lakosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3089#comment-6497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least 10% of that rejected heat can be converted to electricity by off the shelf Organic Rankine Cycle generators that can use wate heat as low as 165F. Pacific Northwest Labs are developing a Metal Organic Heat Capture molecule that could improve low temperature heat transfer considerably. Using this waste heat should be a DOE priority both in R&amp;D and deployment. DOE should dispatch  teams to every generation station to engineer ORC bottoming cycles to improve generation efficiency by &gt;10%. This same principle can be used to capture waste heat from vehicle engines for increased hybrid power or elimination of alternators.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least 10% of that rejected heat can be converted to electricity by off the shelf Organic Rankine Cycle generators that can use wate heat as low as 165F. Pacific Northwest Labs are developing a Metal Organic Heat Capture molecule that could improve low temperature heat transfer considerably. Using this waste heat should be a DOE priority both in R&amp;D and deployment. DOE should dispatch  teams to every generation station to engineer ORC bottoming cycles to improve generation efficiency by &gt;10%. This same principle can be used to capture waste heat from vehicle engines for increased hybrid power or elimination of alternators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Lakosh</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/17/us-energy-use-drops-in-2008-infographics/#comment-23872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Lakosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3089#comment-23872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least 10% of that rejected heat can be converted to electricity by off the shelf Organic Rankine Cycle generators that can use wate heat as low as 165F. Pacific Northwest Labs are developing a Metal Organic Heat Capture molecule that could improve low temperature heat transfer considerably. Using this waste heat should be a DOE priority both in R&amp;D and deployment. DOE should dispatch  teams to every generation station to engineer ORC bottoming cycles to improve generation efficiency by &gt;10%. This same principle can be used to capture waste heat from vehicle engines for increased hybrid power or elimination of alternators.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least 10% of that rejected heat can be converted to electricity by off the shelf Organic Rankine Cycle generators that can use wate heat as low as 165F. Pacific Northwest Labs are developing a Metal Organic Heat Capture molecule that could improve low temperature heat transfer considerably. Using this waste heat should be a DOE priority both in R&amp;D and deployment. DOE should dispatch  teams to every generation station to engineer ORC bottoming cycles to improve generation efficiency by &gt;10%. This same principle can be used to capture waste heat from vehicle engines for increased hybrid power or elimination of alternators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/17/us-energy-use-drops-in-2008-infographics/#comment-6496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3089#comment-6496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, that huge amount of &quot;Rejected Energy&quot; is energy we can use in the future by improving efficiency, right?  Of course, the fine print says those are just estimates based on 80% efficiency in non-transportation uses and 25% efficiency in transportation.  Still, if those estimates are anywhere near accurate, there are large gains to be made by improving efficiency.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, that huge amount of &#8220;Rejected Energy&#8221; is energy we can use in the future by improving efficiency, right?  Of course, the fine print says those are just estimates based on 80% efficiency in non-transportation uses and 25% efficiency in transportation.  Still, if those estimates are anywhere near accurate, there are large gains to be made by improving efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/17/us-energy-use-drops-in-2008-infographics/#comment-23871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=3089#comment-23871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, that huge amount of &quot;Rejected Energy&quot; is energy we can use in the future by improving efficiency, right?  Of course, the fine print says those are just estimates based on 80% efficiency in non-transportation uses and 25% efficiency in transportation.  Still, if those estimates are anywhere near accurate, there are large gains to be made by improving efficiency.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, that huge amount of &#8220;Rejected Energy&#8221; is energy we can use in the future by improving efficiency, right?  Of course, the fine print says those are just estimates based on 80% efficiency in non-transportation uses and 25% efficiency in transportation.  Still, if those estimates are anywhere near accurate, there are large gains to be made by improving efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
