CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


CO2 Emissions lazing

Published on August 14th, 2009 | by Susan Kraemer

10

State Takes Lazy Way to Cut Carbon 13%

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

August 14th, 2009 by  

[social_buttons] Utah’s move to a four-day workweek of 10 hour days for government workers has cut energy usage by 13 percent, and once they figure out how to turn off giant office air conditioning and heating units while they’re out of the office, it could rise to the hoped for 20%. Out of a state budget of $11 billion, they have saved $3 million on electricity and gas for 125 state-owned buildings.

Other states are looking at trying this idea, and expanding it to include shutting schools, or stores or businesses. Power use in office buildings alone is a huge emitter of carbon.

The elimination of a work day would also eliminate two rush hours each week across the country, cutting your commuting costs and carbon emissions by 20%, just by driving to work four days instead of five.

Rush hour driving in itself burns up more gas. Snail-pace stop-start commuting causes more pollution than regular driving. (Well, unless you live in an area with great places to go on weekends; then those weekend commutes can sometimes be just as bad.)

Of course, expanding the idea to include shutting everything down one day a week; (not just government offices) is more likely to cut more carbon. But still, for Utah government offices, not bad going. Those Utah government workers now can boast of having “Green jobs.”

And it certainly makes it less stressful for you to get those building permits and contest your speeding tickets in traffic court when government offices are still open when you get out of work on a cool Utah evening.

Via Good

Image from Flikr user xollob58

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today, PV-Insider , SmartGridUpdate, and GreenProphet. She has also been published at Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.



  • http://www.spheralsolar.com/ Solar Panel Kriss

    They should take a much more permanent step and have more people work from home. That will reduce office space and utilities, carbon generation during commuting, etc. I can see a day when offices are only used for face to face meetings.

  • http://www.spheralsolar.com/ Solar Panel Kriss

    They should take a much more permanent step and have more people work from home. That will reduce office space and utilities, carbon generation during commuting, etc. I can see a day when offices are only used for face to face meetings.

  • http://www.iaminformed.wordpress.com Tyler

    Sure would be nice to have 3 day weekends all the time. This is probably coming as great news for the fast food market too, now no one has time to make dinner at home anymore by the time they’re done work. I agree that this is probably shifting energy consumption to homeowners instead. I wonder though if people keep their homes as frigid as most offices are? I don’t think people wear pants and sweaters in their home.

  • http://www.iaminformed.wordpress.com Tyler

    Sure would be nice to have 3 day weekends all the time. This is probably coming as great news for the fast food market too, now no one has time to make dinner at home anymore by the time they’re done work. I agree that this is probably shifting energy consumption to homeowners instead. I wonder though if people keep their homes as frigid as most offices are? I don’t think people wear pants and sweaters in their home.

  • http://edunetsys.com Virtual Web Symphony

    Four workdays and three holidays. Must be real fun. Can we have this model everywhere to save on the energy usage.

  • http://edunetsys.com Virtual Web Symphony

    Four workdays and three holidays. Must be real fun. Can we have this model everywhere to save on the energy usage.

  • http://www.ecodirect.com jason

    I wonder how much of the energy usage is just shifted to household use and if people drive more on their day off?

  • http://www.ecodirect.com jason

    I wonder how much of the energy usage is just shifted to household use and if people drive more on their day off?

  • Andrew S.

    It is a great plan and as a family where we directly benefit from the states 4 day work week I think it is wonderful, but it is not “green” and I wish people would see the whole picture.

    More people home on Friday run more errands and use MORE gas. They do cut rush hour though. More people home on Friday run more individual air conditioners. Now rather than 100 buildings with typically more energy efficient water cooled systems you have 20,000 people at home running 20,000 air conditioners that used to be dialed down for the day.

    It is all relative. It saves tax payer dollars sort of and cuts the states energy use sort-of, but increases energy use everywhere else.

    Call it for what it is, but don’t call it “green”.

  • Andrew S.

    It is a great plan and as a family where we directly benefit from the states 4 day work week I think it is wonderful, but it is not “green” and I wish people would see the whole picture.

    More people home on Friday run more errands and use MORE gas. They do cut rush hour though. More people home on Friday run more individual air conditioners. Now rather than 100 buildings with typically more energy efficient water cooled systems you have 20,000 people at home running 20,000 air conditioners that used to be dialed down for the day.

    It is all relative. It saves tax payer dollars sort of and cuts the states energy use sort-of, but increases energy use everywhere else.

    Call it for what it is, but don’t call it “green”.

Back to Top ↑