Check out above link to a 2 and a half minute youtube video of a CNN report. What are the odds that the independent testimony below is fraudulent (not bloody likely unless you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist)? Here is a silver bullet technology: clean cheap and abundant energy.

In a joint statement, Dr. K.V. Ramanujachary, Rowan University Meritorious Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Dr. Amos Mugweru, Assistant Professor of Chemistry, and Dr. Peter Jansson P.E., Associate Professor of Engineering said, “In independent tests conducted over the past three months involving 10 solid fuels made by us from commercially-available chemicals, our team of engineering and chemistry professors, staff, and students at Rowan University has independently and consistently generated energy in excesses ranging from 1.2 times to 6.5 times the maximum theoretical heat available through known chemical reactions.”

Also, check out this article: http://green.venturebeat.com/2008/05/30/blacklight-power-claims-nearly-free-energy-from-water-is-this-for-real/

Brad Arnold

St Louis Park, MN, USA

dobermantmacleod@aol.com

http://www.myspace.com/dobermanmacleod

Check out above link to a 2 and a half minute youtube video of a CNN report. What are the odds that the independent testimony below is fraudulent (not bloody likely unless you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist)? Here is a silver bullet technology: clean cheap and abundant energy.

In a joint statement, Dr. K.V. Ramanujachary, Rowan University Meritorious Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Dr. Amos Mugweru, Assistant Professor of Chemistry, and Dr. Peter Jansson P.E., Associate Professor of Engineering said, “In independent tests conducted over the past three months involving 10 solid fuels made by us from commercially-available chemicals, our team of engineering and chemistry professors, staff, and students at Rowan University has independently and consistently generated energy in excesses ranging from 1.2 times to 6.5 times the maximum theoretical heat available through known chemical reactions.”

Also, check out this article: http://green.venturebeat.com/2008/05/30/blacklight-power-claims-nearly-free-energy-from-water-is-this-for-real/

Brad Arnold

St Louis Park, MN, USA

dobermantmacleod@aol.com

http://www.myspace.com/dobermanmacleod

6 “utilities” with fewer than a million customers between them…?

6 “utilities” with fewer than a million customers between them…?

When Galileo applied empirical scientific thinking, he proved things to be the opposite; that the world turned out to revolve around the sun. He was tortured for it, but the age of scientific thought began there anyway.

“distrust of those in the scientific community who continually forecast doom and gloom just around the next corner.”

Many religious conservatives refuse to accept climate science (“doom and gloom”)because they think it’s blasphemy to think God would let us destroy His creation – and that scientists are being presumptuous to think that it could happen.

But there are other equally religious people who think that we must cherish God’s creation (which includes our descendants) and not leave this place a hell.

But I agree with you the natural world is full of amazing surprises and we have barely begun to scratch the surface of it.

When Galileo applied empirical scientific thinking, he proved things to be the opposite; that the world turned out to revolve around the sun. He was tortured for it, but the age of scientific thought began there anyway.

“distrust of those in the scientific community who continually forecast doom and gloom just around the next corner.”

Many religious conservatives refuse to accept climate science (“doom and gloom”)because they think it’s blasphemy to think God would let us destroy His creation – and that scientists are being presumptuous to think that it could happen.

But there are other equally religious people who think that we must cherish God’s creation (which includes our descendants) and not leave this place a hell.

But I agree with you the natural world is full of amazing surprises and we have barely begun to scratch the surface of it.

Once upon a time, the best scientific minds in the civilized world arrived at the consensus that the earth was the center of the universe and that the sun revolved around it. Some time later, conventional wisdom held that the world was flat. The list of scientific bloopers throughout human history is endless. I can’t imagine why people would be somewhat skeptical of the latest and greatest ‘scientific consensus’.

I would disagree that we live in an increasingly anti-science culture. People are not opposed to scientific discovery and advancement. What they are opposed to is the arrogance of the scientific community, and to the notion that their collective wisdom is indisputable. What you are beginning to see is simply a backlash against the worship of science above all else, and a growing distrust of those in the scientific community who continually forecast doom and gloom just around the next corner.

The natural world is an amazing place, and we have barely begun to scratch the surface of it. Isn’t it rather foolish to mock this company’s work just because the ‘scientific consensus’ says that it’s impossible? A wise old physics professor of mine liked to say, “The more you know, the more you know you don’t know.” Perhaps our best and brightest don’t yet know enough to see that they don’t know everything.

Once upon a time, the best scientific minds in the civilized world arrived at the consensus that the earth was the center of the universe and that the sun revolved around it. Some time later, conventional wisdom held that the world was flat. The list of scientific bloopers throughout human history is endless. I can’t imagine why people would be somewhat skeptical of the latest and greatest ‘scientific consensus’.

I would disagree that we live in an increasingly anti-science culture. People are not opposed to scientific discovery and advancement. What they are opposed to is the arrogance of the scientific community, and to the notion that their collective wisdom is indisputable. What you are beginning to see is simply a backlash against the worship of science above all else, and a growing distrust of those in the scientific community who continually forecast doom and gloom just around the next corner.

The natural world is an amazing place, and we have barely begun to scratch the surface of it. Isn’t it rather foolish to mock this company’s work just because the ‘scientific consensus’ says that it’s impossible? A wise old physics professor of mine liked to say, “The more you know, the more you know you don’t know.” Perhaps our best and brightest don’t yet know enough to see that they don’t know everything.

The website has a couple of articles under the Heading HOW? that may be of interest.

In addition to the one labeled fractional Hydrogen, just above it an article about a Self Powered Internal Combustion Engine – SPICE.

Mills is correct in stating that, using fractional Hydrogen as fuel, a barrel of water can equal hundreds of barrels of oil.