<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World&#039;s Largest Solar PV Plant to Be Built in Washington State</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CleanTechnica &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wow, China IS Serious About Clean Energy!</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/#comment-5918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CleanTechnica &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wow, China IS Serious About Clean Energy!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2754#comment-5918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Washington State thought it would take the world title with a planned 75 MW solar PV plant &#8212; think again. It may complete this plant before China&#8217;s, but don&#8217;t think that it will be the big news for long. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Washington State thought it would take the world title with a planned 75 MW solar PV plant &#8212; think again. It may complete this plant before China&#8217;s, but don&#8217;t think that it will be the big news for long. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo Rousso</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/#comment-5917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mo Rousso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2754#comment-5917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the cost number valid?  $100M for 75 MW?  That&#039;s about $1.33/Wdc.  No way!  Current crystalline projects of that size are around $4/Wdc if not a bit higher.  Even your article points out &quot;lower-priced thin film technologies, which are coming in at about $2 per watt, according to Trott.&quot;  Then you have balance of system, labor, land, permitting, and right-of-way costs to add to the PV cost.  Please clarify.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the cost number valid?  $100M for 75 MW?  That&#8217;s about $1.33/Wdc.  No way!  Current crystalline projects of that size are around $4/Wdc if not a bit higher.  Even your article points out &#8220;lower-priced thin film technologies, which are coming in at about $2 per watt, according to Trott.&#8221;  Then you have balance of system, labor, land, permitting, and right-of-way costs to add to the PV cost.  Please clarify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo Rousso</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/#comment-23483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mo Rousso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2754#comment-23483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the cost number valid?  $100M for 75 MW?  That&#039;s about $1.33/Wdc.  No way!  Current crystalline projects of that size are around $4/Wdc if not a bit higher.  Even your article points out &quot;lower-priced thin film technologies, which are coming in at about $2 per watt, according to Trott.&quot;  Then you have balance of system, labor, land, permitting, and right-of-way costs to add to the PV cost.  Please clarify.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the cost number valid?  $100M for 75 MW?  That&#8217;s about $1.33/Wdc.  No way!  Current crystalline projects of that size are around $4/Wdc if not a bit higher.  Even your article points out &#8220;lower-priced thin film technologies, which are coming in at about $2 per watt, according to Trott.&#8221;  Then you have balance of system, labor, land, permitting, and right-of-way costs to add to the PV cost.  Please clarify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Soparkar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/#comment-5916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Soparkar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2754#comment-5916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a step towards green energy revoulation. I am sure many cities will follow soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a step towards green energy revoulation. I am sure many cities will follow soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Soparkar</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/#comment-23482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Soparkar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2754#comment-23482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a step towards green energy revoulation. I am sure many cities will follow soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a step towards green energy revoulation. I am sure many cities will follow soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy B. Hurst</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/#comment-5915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy B. Hurst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2754#comment-5915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, Ed, I&#039;m totally with you. Saying &quot;World&#039;s Largest&quot; is like stopping the world -- Superman-style -- and allowing this but no other project to move forward. That said, in today&#039;s terms, it would still be the biggest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, Ed, I&#8217;m totally with you. Saying &#8220;World&#8217;s Largest&#8221; is like stopping the world &#8212; Superman-style &#8212; and allowing this but no other project to move forward. That said, in today&#8217;s terms, it would still be the biggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy B. Hurst</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/#comment-23481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy B. Hurst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2754#comment-23481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, Ed, I&#039;m totally with you. Saying &quot;World&#039;s Largest&quot; is like stopping the world -- Superman-style -- and allowing this but no other project to move forward. That said, in today&#039;s terms, it would still be the biggest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, Ed, I&#8217;m totally with you. Saying &#8220;World&#8217;s Largest&#8221; is like stopping the world &#8212; Superman-style &#8212; and allowing this but no other project to move forward. That said, in today&#8217;s terms, it would still be the biggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Gunther</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/#comment-5914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Gunther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2754#comment-5914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good work fact checking the largest completed installation (pvresources.com). However, calling this project the world&#039;s largest seems premature until it is completed. They have not even selected a technology yet!



For example, SunPower is developing the 250-275 MWp DC California Valley Solar Ranch (CSRV) project, and First Solar is developing the 550MW (AC) Topaz Farms project (acquired from OptiSolar).



BTW, it is crystalline not chrystalline.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work fact checking the largest completed installation (pvresources.com). However, calling this project the world&#8217;s largest seems premature until it is completed. They have not even selected a technology yet!</p>
<p>For example, SunPower is developing the 250-275 MWp DC California Valley Solar Ranch (CSRV) project, and First Solar is developing the 550MW (AC) Topaz Farms project (acquired from OptiSolar).</p>
<p>BTW, it is crystalline not chrystalline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Gunther</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/09/worlds-largest-solar-pv-plant-to-be-built-in-washington-state/#comment-23480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Gunther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2754#comment-23480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good work fact checking the largest completed installation (pvresources.com). However, calling this project the world&#039;s largest seems premature until it is completed. They have not even selected a technology yet!



For example, SunPower is developing the 250-275 MWp DC California Valley Solar Ranch (CSRV) project, and First Solar is developing the 550MW (AC) Topaz Farms project (acquired from OptiSolar).



BTW, it is crystalline not chrystalline.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work fact checking the largest completed installation (pvresources.com). However, calling this project the world&#8217;s largest seems premature until it is completed. They have not even selected a technology yet!</p>
<p>For example, SunPower is developing the 250-275 MWp DC California Valley Solar Ranch (CSRV) project, and First Solar is developing the 550MW (AC) Topaz Farms project (acquired from OptiSolar).</p>
<p>BTW, it is crystalline not chrystalline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
