<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High-Altitude Winds Hold Sky-High Promise for Meeting Electricity Needs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 18:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closer to the Sun: Satellite Solar is Out of This World : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-6656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Closer to the Sun: Satellite Solar is Out of This World : CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-6656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This is a notch up from high-altitude wind turbines. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This is a notch up from high-altitude wind turbines. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamH</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-6655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SamH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-6655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tether/power cable is a technical problem that gets less problematic as you increase the scale.

You could even use a hollow tube as a microwave energy guide for near-wireless power transfer.



The big thing I see as a drawback would be the impact on air travel. The area around the cables would have to be no-fly zones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tether/power cable is a technical problem that gets less problematic as you increase the scale.</p>
<p>You could even use a hollow tube as a microwave energy guide for near-wireless power transfer.</p>
<p>The big thing I see as a drawback would be the impact on air travel. The area around the cables would have to be no-fly zones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamH</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SamH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tether/power cable is a technical problem that gets less problematic as you increase the scale.

You could even use a hollow tube as a microwave energy guide for near-wireless power transfer.



The big thing I see as a drawback would be the impact on air travel. The area around the cables would have to be no-fly zones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tether/power cable is a technical problem that gets less problematic as you increase the scale.</p>
<p>You could even use a hollow tube as a microwave energy guide for near-wireless power transfer.</p>
<p>The big thing I see as a drawback would be the impact on air travel. The area around the cables would have to be no-fly zones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamH</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SamH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tether/power cable is a technical problem that gets less problematic as you increase the scale.

You could even use a hollow tube as a microwave energy guide for near-wireless power transfer.



The big thing I see as a drawback would be the impact on air travel. The area around the cables would have to be no-fly zones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tether/power cable is a technical problem that gets less problematic as you increase the scale.</p>
<p>You could even use a hollow tube as a microwave energy guide for near-wireless power transfer.</p>
<p>The big thing I see as a drawback would be the impact on air travel. The area around the cables would have to be no-fly zones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kart</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-6654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Kart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-6654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mr. Sinister

Wireless energy. Good one. Thanks for the comments all. I figured the &#039;tether from the sky&#039; line would generate some discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mr. Sinister</p>
<p>Wireless energy. Good one. Thanks for the comments all. I figured the &#8216;tether from the sky&#8217; line would generate some discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kart</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Kart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mr. Sinister

Wireless energy. Good one. Thanks for the comments all. I figured the &#039;tether from the sky&#039; line would generate some discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mr. Sinister</p>
<p>Wireless energy. Good one. Thanks for the comments all. I figured the &#8216;tether from the sky&#8217; line would generate some discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Sinister</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-6653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Sinister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-6653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, 30,000 feet is most certainly too high for a conventional power transmission cable.  It would snap under it&#039;s own weight.  And surely no one is going to contruct a 30,000 foot tower on which to place conventional wind turbines.  I don&#039;t think our current state of materials engineering is up to a challenge of that magnitude.



Perhaps a modern, unmanned version of the lighter-than-air ship or a solar-powered glider?  New technologies are starting to emerge that might make it possible to harness and deliver the energy collected by such a device back to the ground.  Methanogenesis using direct current, for example, could allow electricity to be converted to methane and returned to the ground in storage tanks.  Or perhaps one of the new emerging technologies for wireless power transmission using microwaves.



The key, of course, as with any energy harvesting technology, is whether you can get more out of it than you put into it.  Only time will tell, I suppose, but it would be an exciting engineering challenge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, 30,000 feet is most certainly too high for a conventional power transmission cable.  It would snap under it&#8217;s own weight.  And surely no one is going to contruct a 30,000 foot tower on which to place conventional wind turbines.  I don&#8217;t think our current state of materials engineering is up to a challenge of that magnitude.</p>
<p>Perhaps a modern, unmanned version of the lighter-than-air ship or a solar-powered glider?  New technologies are starting to emerge that might make it possible to harness and deliver the energy collected by such a device back to the ground.  Methanogenesis using direct current, for example, could allow electricity to be converted to methane and returned to the ground in storage tanks.  Or perhaps one of the new emerging technologies for wireless power transmission using microwaves.</p>
<p>The key, of course, as with any energy harvesting technology, is whether you can get more out of it than you put into it.  Only time will tell, I suppose, but it would be an exciting engineering challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Sinister</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Sinister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, 30,000 feet is most certainly too high for a conventional power transmission cable.  It would snap under it&#039;s own weight.  And surely no one is going to contruct a 30,000 foot tower on which to place conventional wind turbines.  I don&#039;t think our current state of materials engineering is up to a challenge of that magnitude.



Perhaps a modern, unmanned version of the lighter-than-air ship or a solar-powered glider?  New technologies are starting to emerge that might make it possible to harness and deliver the energy collected by such a device back to the ground.  Methanogenesis using direct current, for example, could allow electricity to be converted to methane and returned to the ground in storage tanks.  Or perhaps one of the new emerging technologies for wireless power transmission using microwaves.



The key, of course, as with any energy harvesting technology, is whether you can get more out of it than you put into it.  Only time will tell, I suppose, but it would be an exciting engineering challenge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, 30,000 feet is most certainly too high for a conventional power transmission cable.  It would snap under it&#8217;s own weight.  And surely no one is going to contruct a 30,000 foot tower on which to place conventional wind turbines.  I don&#8217;t think our current state of materials engineering is up to a challenge of that magnitude.</p>
<p>Perhaps a modern, unmanned version of the lighter-than-air ship or a solar-powered glider?  New technologies are starting to emerge that might make it possible to harness and deliver the energy collected by such a device back to the ground.  Methanogenesis using direct current, for example, could allow electricity to be converted to methane and returned to the ground in storage tanks.  Or perhaps one of the new emerging technologies for wireless power transmission using microwaves.</p>
<p>The key, of course, as with any energy harvesting technology, is whether you can get more out of it than you put into it.  Only time will tell, I suppose, but it would be an exciting engineering challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Sinister</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Sinister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, 30,000 feet is most certainly too high for a conventional power transmission cable.  It would snap under it&#039;s own weight.  And surely no one is going to contruct a 30,000 foot tower on which to place conventional wind turbines.  I don&#039;t think our current state of materials engineering is up to a challenge of that magnitude.



Perhaps a modern, unmanned version of the lighter-than-air ship or a solar-powered glider?  New technologies are starting to emerge that might make it possible to harness and deliver the energy collected by such a device back to the ground.  Methanogenesis using direct current, for example, could allow electricity to be converted to methane and returned to the ground in storage tanks.  Or perhaps one of the new emerging technologies for wireless power transmission using microwaves.



The key, of course, as with any energy harvesting technology, is whether you can get more out of it than you put into it.  Only time will tell, I suppose, but it would be an exciting engineering challenge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, 30,000 feet is most certainly too high for a conventional power transmission cable.  It would snap under it&#8217;s own weight.  And surely no one is going to contruct a 30,000 foot tower on which to place conventional wind turbines.  I don&#8217;t think our current state of materials engineering is up to a challenge of that magnitude.</p>
<p>Perhaps a modern, unmanned version of the lighter-than-air ship or a solar-powered glider?  New technologies are starting to emerge that might make it possible to harness and deliver the energy collected by such a device back to the ground.  Methanogenesis using direct current, for example, could allow electricity to be converted to methane and returned to the ground in storage tanks.  Or perhaps one of the new emerging technologies for wireless power transmission using microwaves.</p>
<p>The key, of course, as with any energy harvesting technology, is whether you can get more out of it than you put into it.  Only time will tell, I suppose, but it would be an exciting engineering challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Sinister</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Sinister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, 30,000 feet is most certainly too high for a conventional power transmission cable.  It would snap under it&#039;s own weight.  And surely no one is going to contruct a 30,000 foot tower on which to place conventional wind turbines.  I don&#039;t think our current state of materials engineering is up to a challenge of that magnitude.



Perhaps a modern, unmanned version of the lighter-than-air ship or a solar-powered glider?  New technologies are starting to emerge that might make it possible to harness and deliver the energy collected by such a device back to the ground.  Methanogenesis using direct current, for example, could allow electricity to be converted to methane and returned to the ground in storage tanks.  Or perhaps one of the new emerging technologies for wireless power transmission using microwaves.



The key, of course, as with any energy harvesting technology, is whether you can get more out of it than you put into it.  Only time will tell, I suppose, but it would be an exciting engineering challenge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, 30,000 feet is most certainly too high for a conventional power transmission cable.  It would snap under it&#8217;s own weight.  And surely no one is going to contruct a 30,000 foot tower on which to place conventional wind turbines.  I don&#8217;t think our current state of materials engineering is up to a challenge of that magnitude.</p>
<p>Perhaps a modern, unmanned version of the lighter-than-air ship or a solar-powered glider?  New technologies are starting to emerge that might make it possible to harness and deliver the energy collected by such a device back to the ground.  Methanogenesis using direct current, for example, could allow electricity to be converted to methane and returned to the ground in storage tanks.  Or perhaps one of the new emerging technologies for wireless power transmission using microwaves.</p>
<p>The key, of course, as with any energy harvesting technology, is whether you can get more out of it than you put into it.  Only time will tell, I suppose, but it would be an exciting engineering challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-6652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-6652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The entire concept of high altitude wind generation is dependant on the development on till now none-existent technology. These companies all talk glowing about placing a couple of ton of wind turbine at 40,000 feet, that&#039;s 7.5 miles (12 km) worth of large cross sectional power cable in addition to the tons of generator being hosted aloft.



These things are meant to be litter than air... LOL



Get in touch with reality, semi permanent stationary observation platforms at that altitude are still in the early development stages, let alone hanging a wind turbine and suspending several tons of cable off one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire concept of high altitude wind generation is dependant on the development on till now none-existent technology. These companies all talk glowing about placing a couple of ton of wind turbine at 40,000 feet, that&#8217;s 7.5 miles (12 km) worth of large cross sectional power cable in addition to the tons of generator being hosted aloft.</p>
<p>These things are meant to be litter than air&#8230; LOL</p>
<p>Get in touch with reality, semi permanent stationary observation platforms at that altitude are still in the early development stages, let alone hanging a wind turbine and suspending several tons of cable off one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The entire concept of high altitude wind generation is dependant on the development on till now none-existent technology. These companies all talk glowing about placing a couple of ton of wind turbine at 40,000 feet, that&#039;s 7.5 miles (12 km) worth of large cross sectional power cable in addition to the tons of generator being hosted aloft.



These things are meant to be litter than air... LOL



Get in touch with reality, semi permanent stationary observation platforms at that altitude are still in the early development stages, let alone hanging a wind turbine and suspending several tons of cable off one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire concept of high altitude wind generation is dependant on the development on till now none-existent technology. These companies all talk glowing about placing a couple of ton of wind turbine at 40,000 feet, that&#8217;s 7.5 miles (12 km) worth of large cross sectional power cable in addition to the tons of generator being hosted aloft.</p>
<p>These things are meant to be litter than air&#8230; LOL</p>
<p>Get in touch with reality, semi permanent stationary observation platforms at that altitude are still in the early development stages, let alone hanging a wind turbine and suspending several tons of cable off one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The entire concept of high altitude wind generation is dependant on the development on till now none-existent technology. These companies all talk glowing about placing a couple of ton of wind turbine at 40,000 feet, that&#039;s 7.5 miles (12 km) worth of large cross sectional power cable in addition to the tons of generator being hosted aloft.



These things are meant to be litter than air... LOL



Get in touch with reality, semi permanent stationary observation platforms at that altitude are still in the early development stages, let alone hanging a wind turbine and suspending several tons of cable off one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire concept of high altitude wind generation is dependant on the development on till now none-existent technology. These companies all talk glowing about placing a couple of ton of wind turbine at 40,000 feet, that&#8217;s 7.5 miles (12 km) worth of large cross sectional power cable in addition to the tons of generator being hosted aloft.</p>
<p>These things are meant to be litter than air&#8230; LOL</p>
<p>Get in touch with reality, semi permanent stationary observation platforms at that altitude are still in the early development stages, let alone hanging a wind turbine and suspending several tons of cable off one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-6651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Kennedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-6651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This particular high altitude concept is massively flawed.  If the generator is at altitude a long heavy conductor is required to transmit the power to the ground.  The more power, the heavier is the transmission cable, the more lift is required.  High altitude is a feasible energy source but keep the generator on the ground.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular high altitude concept is massively flawed.  If the generator is at altitude a long heavy conductor is required to transmit the power to the ground.  The more power, the heavier is the transmission cable, the more lift is required.  High altitude is a feasible energy source but keep the generator on the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Kennedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This particular high altitude concept is massively flawed.  If the generator is at altitude a long heavy conductor is required to transmit the power to the ground.  The more power, the heavier is the transmission cable, the more lift is required.  High altitude is a feasible energy source but keep the generator on the ground.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular high altitude concept is massively flawed.  If the generator is at altitude a long heavy conductor is required to transmit the power to the ground.  The more power, the heavier is the transmission cable, the more lift is required.  High altitude is a feasible energy source but keep the generator on the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Kennedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This particular high altitude concept is massively flawed.  If the generator is at altitude a long heavy conductor is required to transmit the power to the ground.  The more power, the heavier is the transmission cable, the more lift is required.  High altitude is a feasible energy source but keep the generator on the ground.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular high altitude concept is massively flawed.  If the generator is at altitude a long heavy conductor is required to transmit the power to the ground.  The more power, the heavier is the transmission cable, the more lift is required.  High altitude is a feasible energy source but keep the generator on the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/16/high-altitude-winds-hold-sky-high-promise-for-meeting-electricity-needs/#comment-23085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max Kennedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2653#comment-23085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This particular high altitude concept is massively flawed.  If the generator is at altitude a long heavy conductor is required to transmit the power to the ground.  The more power, the heavier is the transmission cable, the more lift is required.  High altitude is a feasible energy source but keep the generator on the ground.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular high altitude concept is massively flawed.  If the generator is at altitude a long heavy conductor is required to transmit the power to the ground.  The more power, the heavier is the transmission cable, the more lift is required.  High altitude is a feasible energy source but keep the generator on the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
