<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington University in St. Louis May Sport Greenest Building in North America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Winget</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/#comment-6569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Winget]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2600#comment-6569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This standard sounds great and I&#039;m overjoyed to hear that it&#039;s being taken seriously by such a wide swath of the general public. I know that one of the reasons for the rather conservative LEED standards was the fear that no one would even attempt to meet them if they were set too high.



Despite this good news, however, there is a higher standard that was set out by William McDonough: Cradle to Cradle. Again, I will say that I am proud to see institutions aiming to meet 0-energy standards, but frankly there is no real victory without a Cradle-to-Cradle solution. The simple fact is that if a building in any stage of its construction, life-cycle, or disposal, uses more energy than it collects, or more materials than it can give back in its recycling, it has failed to meet the definition of sustainability.



Furthermore, the building should be well-and-elegantly-designed, and from the looks of these photos, this new center is a box with pre-fab square windows on one side: not very elegant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This standard sounds great and I&#8217;m overjoyed to hear that it&#8217;s being taken seriously by such a wide swath of the general public. I know that one of the reasons for the rather conservative LEED standards was the fear that no one would even attempt to meet them if they were set too high.</p>
<p>Despite this good news, however, there is a higher standard that was set out by William McDonough: Cradle to Cradle. Again, I will say that I am proud to see institutions aiming to meet 0-energy standards, but frankly there is no real victory without a Cradle-to-Cradle solution. The simple fact is that if a building in any stage of its construction, life-cycle, or disposal, uses more energy than it collects, or more materials than it can give back in its recycling, it has failed to meet the definition of sustainability.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the building should be well-and-elegantly-designed, and from the looks of these photos, this new center is a box with pre-fab square windows on one side: not very elegant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Winget</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/#comment-22976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Winget]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2600#comment-22976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This standard sounds great and I&#039;m overjoyed to hear that it&#039;s being taken seriously by such a wide swath of the general public. I know that one of the reasons for the rather conservative LEED standards was the fear that no one would even attempt to meet them if they were set too high.



Despite this good news, however, there is a higher standard that was set out by William McDonough: Cradle to Cradle. Again, I will say that I am proud to see institutions aiming to meet 0-energy standards, but frankly there is no real victory without a Cradle-to-Cradle solution. The simple fact is that if a building in any stage of its construction, life-cycle, or disposal, uses more energy than it collects, or more materials than it can give back in its recycling, it has failed to meet the definition of sustainability.



Furthermore, the building should be well-and-elegantly-designed, and from the looks of these photos, this new center is a box with pre-fab square windows on one side: not very elegant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This standard sounds great and I&#8217;m overjoyed to hear that it&#8217;s being taken seriously by such a wide swath of the general public. I know that one of the reasons for the rather conservative LEED standards was the fear that no one would even attempt to meet them if they were set too high.</p>
<p>Despite this good news, however, there is a higher standard that was set out by William McDonough: Cradle to Cradle. Again, I will say that I am proud to see institutions aiming to meet 0-energy standards, but frankly there is no real victory without a Cradle-to-Cradle solution. The simple fact is that if a building in any stage of its construction, life-cycle, or disposal, uses more energy than it collects, or more materials than it can give back in its recycling, it has failed to meet the definition of sustainability.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the building should be well-and-elegantly-designed, and from the looks of these photos, this new center is a box with pre-fab square windows on one side: not very elegant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/#comment-6568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2600#comment-6568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like One Planet Living ten easy to remember standards too. Net zero energy is so possible in so many cases that it is ridiculous to go for anything less.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like One Planet Living ten easy to remember standards too. Net zero energy is so possible in so many cases that it is ridiculous to go for anything less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/#comment-22974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2600#comment-22974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like One Planet Living ten easy to remember standards too. Net zero energy is so possible in so many cases that it is ridiculous to go for anything less.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like One Planet Living ten easy to remember standards too. Net zero energy is so possible in so many cases that it is ridiculous to go for anything less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/washington-university-in-st-louis-may-sport-greenest-building-in-north-america/#comment-22975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Kraemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2600#comment-22975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like One Planet Living ten easy to remember standards too. Net zero energy is so possible in so many cases that it is ridiculous to go for anything less.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like One Planet Living ten easy to remember standards too. Net zero energy is so possible in so many cases that it is ridiculous to go for anything less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
