<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Renewable Energy Lab Looks at Proposed U.S. Electricity Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/#comment-6567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2586#comment-6567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Solar PV and Thermal are great things, but they will never cut down on carbon emissions.  They simply can not produce enough power for the masses.  The only thing right now that can drastically cut down on carbon emissions is nuclear energy.  If your seriously worried about climate change like I am, you have to get serious and understand that we need nuclear.  We will simply have to find a way to handle the waste.  Maybe blast it into outer space?  Re-enrich the used uranium?  I&#039;m no nuclear tech, and I want to live off-grid more than anything, but we have to stop burning coal and nuclear is the only way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solar PV and Thermal are great things, but they will never cut down on carbon emissions.  They simply can not produce enough power for the masses.  The only thing right now that can drastically cut down on carbon emissions is nuclear energy.  If your seriously worried about climate change like I am, you have to get serious and understand that we need nuclear.  We will simply have to find a way to handle the waste.  Maybe blast it into outer space?  Re-enrich the used uranium?  I&#8217;m no nuclear tech, and I want to live off-grid more than anything, but we have to stop burning coal and nuclear is the only way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/#comment-22966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2586#comment-22966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Solar PV and Thermal are great things, but they will never cut down on carbon emissions.  They simply can not produce enough power for the masses.  The only thing right now that can drastically cut down on carbon emissions is nuclear energy.  If your seriously worried about climate change like I am, you have to get serious and understand that we need nuclear.  We will simply have to find a way to handle the waste.  Maybe blast it into outer space?  Re-enrich the used uranium?  I&#039;m no nuclear tech, and I want to live off-grid more than anything, but we have to stop burning coal and nuclear is the only way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solar PV and Thermal are great things, but they will never cut down on carbon emissions.  They simply can not produce enough power for the masses.  The only thing right now that can drastically cut down on carbon emissions is nuclear energy.  If your seriously worried about climate change like I am, you have to get serious and understand that we need nuclear.  We will simply have to find a way to handle the waste.  Maybe blast it into outer space?  Re-enrich the used uranium?  I&#8217;m no nuclear tech, and I want to live off-grid more than anything, but we have to stop burning coal and nuclear is the only way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/#comment-6566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2586#comment-6566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best plan is plan 4 = carbon tax.

May not be palatable, but neither is climate change]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best plan is plan 4 = carbon tax.</p>
<p>May not be palatable, but neither is climate change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/#comment-22964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2586#comment-22964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best plan is plan 4 = carbon tax.

May not be palatable, but neither is climate change]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best plan is plan 4 = carbon tax.</p>
<p>May not be palatable, but neither is climate change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/#comment-22965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2586#comment-22965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best plan is plan 4 = carbon tax.

May not be palatable, but neither is climate change]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best plan is plan 4 = carbon tax.</p>
<p>May not be palatable, but neither is climate change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/#comment-6565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Kaiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2586#comment-6565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I added a section to my blog yesterday looking at where we current get our electricity from:

http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/



If you scroll to the bottom, you can see that Solar PV and Thermal provide .01% of our power gen!



I&#039;m a big fan of a National RPS. I would rather Congress focus on that than a cap/trade system because a RPS system is harder to cheat on.



Also, emissions from one state can blow into another state, so it makes sense for it to be nationally regulated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added a section to my blog yesterday looking at where we current get our electricity from:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/</a></p>
<p>If you scroll to the bottom, you can see that Solar PV and Thermal provide .01% of our power gen!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of a National RPS. I would rather Congress focus on that than a cap/trade system because a RPS system is harder to cheat on.</p>
<p>Also, emissions from one state can blow into another state, so it makes sense for it to be nationally regulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/#comment-22962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Kaiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2586#comment-22962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I added a section to my blog yesterday looking at where we current get our electricity from:

http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/



If you scroll to the bottom, you can see that Solar PV and Thermal provide .01% of our power gen!



I&#039;m a big fan of a National RPS. I would rather Congress focus on that than a cap/trade system because a RPS system is harder to cheat on.



Also, emissions from one state can blow into another state, so it makes sense for it to be nationally regulated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added a section to my blog yesterday looking at where we current get our electricity from:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/</a></p>
<p>If you scroll to the bottom, you can see that Solar PV and Thermal provide .01% of our power gen!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of a National RPS. I would rather Congress focus on that than a cap/trade system because a RPS system is harder to cheat on.</p>
<p>Also, emissions from one state can blow into another state, so it makes sense for it to be nationally regulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/#comment-22963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Kaiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2586#comment-22963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I added a section to my blog yesterday looking at where we current get our electricity from:

http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/



If you scroll to the bottom, you can see that Solar PV and Thermal provide .01% of our power gen!



I&#039;m a big fan of a National RPS. I would rather Congress focus on that than a cap/trade system because a RPS system is harder to cheat on.



Also, emissions from one state can blow into another state, so it makes sense for it to be nationally regulated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added a section to my blog yesterday looking at where we current get our electricity from:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/</a></p>
<p>If you scroll to the bottom, you can see that Solar PV and Thermal provide .01% of our power gen!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of a National RPS. I would rather Congress focus on that than a cap/trade system because a RPS system is harder to cheat on.</p>
<p>Also, emissions from one state can blow into another state, so it makes sense for it to be nationally regulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
