National Renewable Energy Lab Looks at Proposed U.S. Electricity Standards

June 2nd, 2009 by Jeff Kart

The United States have already started down the path of Renewable Portfolio Standards.

There are now almost 30 states with their own RPSes, which require utilities to generate more of their power from renewable sources, like wind and solar and even landfill gas. Different states have set different standards, often with percentages based on years: 15 percent by 2015, for instance. It’s more catchy that way.

Now Congress is discussing a national RPS, which would set minimum standards for all states. RPSes, also known as Renewable Electricity Standards, can drive investment in renewable technologies. They can pave the way for new investment in turbines and panels, and associated jobs that come with the pay out. Sure, renewables may cost more for now, but you probably remember that economies of scale thing from high school.

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory looks at three proposed standards in a new 30-page report (.pdf). They’re the master plans — from Senator Jeff Bingaman and Representative Edward Markey, and jointly by representatives Henry Waxman and Markey — that have risen to the top for now, being discussed in U.S. House and Senate committees.

The bottom line: The report doesn’t really choose a “best plan.” But Markey seems to get the best marks for a 25% by 2025 RES target with no energy efficiency substitutions allowed.

“The Markey RES legislation requires significantly greater renewable power deployment and the construction of new transmission infrastructure in a timely manner,” it says on pdf page 22.

Browse the report, and tell me what you think. Which of these plans is best for America? Or is there a fourth plan that was left out?

Image Credit: Divwerf via flickr under Creative Commons License

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Tags: Congress, markey, Renewable Portfolio Standard

About the Author

Jeff Kart is typing about issues in the Great Lakes, from advanced biofuels to zero-emission vehicles. Jeff is an environmental journalist and social media evangelist based in Michigan, where the summers are short, the winters are cold, and the stories are plentiful.

Steve

Solar PV and Thermal are great things, but they will never cut down on carbon emissions. They simply can not produce enough power for the masses. The only thing right now that can drastically cut down on carbon emissions is nuclear energy. If your seriously worried about climate change like I am, you have to get serious and understand that we need nuclear. We will simply have to find a way to handle the waste. Maybe blast it into outer space? Re-enrich the used uranium? I’m no nuclear tech, and I want to live off-grid more than anything, but we have to stop burning coal and nuclear is the only way.
Steve

Solar PV and Thermal are great things, but they will never cut down on carbon emissions. They simply can not produce enough power for the masses. The only thing right now that can drastically cut down on carbon emissions is nuclear energy. If your seriously worried about climate change like I am, you have to get serious and understand that we need nuclear. We will simply have to find a way to handle the waste. Maybe blast it into outer space? Re-enrich the used uranium? I’m no nuclear tech, and I want to live off-grid more than anything, but we have to stop burning coal and nuclear is the only way.
kevin

Best plan is plan 4 = carbon tax.

May not be palatable, but neither is climate change
kevin

Best plan is plan 4 = carbon tax.

May not be palatable, but neither is climate change
kevin

Best plan is plan 4 = carbon tax.

May not be palatable, but neither is climate change
http://blog.mapawatt.com Chris Kaiser

I added a section to my blog yesterday looking at where we current get our electricity from:

http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/

If you scroll to the bottom, you can see that Solar PV and Thermal provide .01% of our power gen!

I’m a big fan of a National RPS. I would rather Congress focus on that than a cap/trade system because a RPS system is harder to cheat on.

Also, emissions from one state can blow into another state, so it makes sense for it to be nationally regulated.
http://blog.mapawatt.com Chris Kaiser

I added a section to my blog yesterday looking at where we current get our electricity from:

http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/

If you scroll to the bottom, you can see that Solar PV and Thermal provide .01% of our power gen!

I’m a big fan of a National RPS. I would rather Congress focus on that than a cap/trade system because a RPS system is harder to cheat on.

Also, emissions from one state can blow into another state, so it makes sense for it to be nationally regulated.
http://blog.mapawatt.com Chris Kaiser

I added a section to my blog yesterday looking at where we current get our electricity from:

http://blog.mapawatt.com/tidbits/electricity-graphics/

If you scroll to the bottom, you can see that Solar PV and Thermal provide .01% of our power gen!

I’m a big fan of a National RPS. I would rather Congress focus on that than a cap/trade system because a RPS system is harder to cheat on.

Also, emissions from one state can blow into another state, so it makes sense for it to be nationally regulated.