<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concentrated Solar Power Could Generate 25% of the World&#039;s Electricity by 2050</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 02:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gossamer Teases More Energy from Thin Film Solar : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-6543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gossamer Teases More Energy from Thin Film Solar : CleanTechnica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-6543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Space Frames has introduced two new concentrated solar power technologies that marry low tech components and off-the-shelf elements with high tech thin film [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Space Frames has introduced two new concentrated solar power technologies that marry low tech components and off-the-shelf elements with high tech thin film [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-6542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Jacobson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-6542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t Forget Australia there have shed-loads of reliable solar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t Forget Australia there have shed-loads of reliable solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Jacobson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t Forget Australia there have shed-loads of reliable solar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t Forget Australia there have shed-loads of reliable solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Jacobson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t Forget Australia there have shed-loads of reliable solar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t Forget Australia there have shed-loads of reliable solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahab khan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-6541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shahab khan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-6541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simply amazing!

If it can generate this much power after accounting the population and some other factors of 2050 then its really a great structure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply amazing!</p>
<p>If it can generate this much power after accounting the population and some other factors of 2050 then its really a great structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahab khan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shahab khan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simply amazing!

If it can generate this much power after accounting the population and some other factors of 2050 then its really a great structure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply amazing!</p>
<p>If it can generate this much power after accounting the population and some other factors of 2050 then its really a great structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahab khan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shahab khan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simply amazing!

If it can generate this much power after accounting the population and some other factors of 2050 then its really a great structure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply amazing!</p>
<p>If it can generate this much power after accounting the population and some other factors of 2050 then its really a great structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RecycleBill</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-6540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RecycleBill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-6540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russ,

Who said anything about small scale CSP. Not me. Think big picture, hundreds of mirrors all over a large Southern city all aimed at one point would produce just as much energy as the same size array in the middle of nowhere without the environmental damage, need for new infrastructure (highways, housing, businesses all built in the middle of nowhere) and the constantant damage to mirrors by sandstorms. (Ever been in a sandstorm in an Arisona or California desert? I have.)



Have you even thought about the energy, natural resourses and CO2 road building requires. Paved 2 land roads capable of handling trucks now exceed $1,000,000 (Million) Dollars per mile.



And recent plans by one of the largest electric utilties in the USA &lt;a href=&quot;http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/duke-energy-proves-recyclebill-right.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;adds weight to my argument&lt;/a&gt;.



Russ, simply think large scale CSP &lt;a href=&quot;http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/just-say-no-to-renewable-energy-zones-on-public-lands.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;where the people live and the power is needed&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,</p>
<p>Who said anything about small scale CSP. Not me. Think big picture, hundreds of mirrors all over a large Southern city all aimed at one point would produce just as much energy as the same size array in the middle of nowhere without the environmental damage, need for new infrastructure (highways, housing, businesses all built in the middle of nowhere) and the constantant damage to mirrors by sandstorms. (Ever been in a sandstorm in an Arisona or California desert? I have.)</p>
<p>Have you even thought about the energy, natural resourses and CO2 road building requires. Paved 2 land roads capable of handling trucks now exceed $1,000,000 (Million) Dollars per mile.</p>
<p>And recent plans by one of the largest electric utilties in the USA <a href="http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/duke-energy-proves-recyclebill-right.html" rel="nofollow">adds weight to my argument</a>.</p>
<p>Russ, simply think large scale CSP <a href="http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/just-say-no-to-renewable-energy-zones-on-public-lands.html" rel="nofollow">where the people live and the power is needed</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RecycleBill</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RecycleBill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russ,

Who said anything about small scale CSP. Not me. Think big picture, hundreds of mirrors all over a large Southern city all aimed at one point would produce just as much energy as the same size array in the middle of nowhere without the environmental damage, need for new infrastructure (highways, housing, businesses all built in the middle of nowhere) and the constantant damage to mirrors by sandstorms. (Ever been in a sandstorm in an Arisona or California desert? I have.)



Have you even thought about the energy, natural resourses and CO2 road building requires. Paved 2 land roads capable of handling trucks now exceed $1,000,000 (Million) Dollars per mile.



And recent plans by one of the largest electric utilties in the USA &lt;a href=&quot;http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/duke-energy-proves-recyclebill-right.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;adds weight to my argument&lt;/a&gt;.



Russ, simply think large scale CSP &lt;a href=&quot;http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/just-say-no-to-renewable-energy-zones-on-public-lands.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;where the people live and the power is needed&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,</p>
<p>Who said anything about small scale CSP. Not me. Think big picture, hundreds of mirrors all over a large Southern city all aimed at one point would produce just as much energy as the same size array in the middle of nowhere without the environmental damage, need for new infrastructure (highways, housing, businesses all built in the middle of nowhere) and the constantant damage to mirrors by sandstorms. (Ever been in a sandstorm in an Arisona or California desert? I have.)</p>
<p>Have you even thought about the energy, natural resourses and CO2 road building requires. Paved 2 land roads capable of handling trucks now exceed $1,000,000 (Million) Dollars per mile.</p>
<p>And recent plans by one of the largest electric utilties in the USA <a href="http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/duke-energy-proves-recyclebill-right.html" rel="nofollow">adds weight to my argument</a>.</p>
<p>Russ, simply think large scale CSP <a href="http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/just-say-no-to-renewable-energy-zones-on-public-lands.html" rel="nofollow">where the people live and the power is needed</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RecycleBill</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RecycleBill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russ,

Who said anything about small scale CSP. Not me. Think big picture, hundreds of mirrors all over a large Southern city all aimed at one point would produce just as much energy as the same size array in the middle of nowhere without the environmental damage, need for new infrastructure (highways, housing, businesses all built in the middle of nowhere) and the constantant damage to mirrors by sandstorms. (Ever been in a sandstorm in an Arisona or California desert? I have.)



Have you even thought about the energy, natural resourses and CO2 road building requires. Paved 2 land roads capable of handling trucks now exceed $1,000,000 (Million) Dollars per mile.



And recent plans by one of the largest electric utilties in the USA &lt;a href=&quot;http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/duke-energy-proves-recyclebill-right.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;adds weight to my argument&lt;/a&gt;.



Russ, simply think large scale CSP &lt;a href=&quot;http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/just-say-no-to-renewable-energy-zones-on-public-lands.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;where the people live and the power is needed&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,</p>
<p>Who said anything about small scale CSP. Not me. Think big picture, hundreds of mirrors all over a large Southern city all aimed at one point would produce just as much energy as the same size array in the middle of nowhere without the environmental damage, need for new infrastructure (highways, housing, businesses all built in the middle of nowhere) and the constantant damage to mirrors by sandstorms. (Ever been in a sandstorm in an Arisona or California desert? I have.)</p>
<p>Have you even thought about the energy, natural resourses and CO2 road building requires. Paved 2 land roads capable of handling trucks now exceed $1,000,000 (Million) Dollars per mile.</p>
<p>And recent plans by one of the largest electric utilties in the USA <a href="http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/duke-energy-proves-recyclebill-right.html" rel="nofollow">adds weight to my argument</a>.</p>
<p>Russ, simply think large scale CSP <a href="http://recyclebills.squarespace.com/recycleblog/just-say-no-to-renewable-energy-zones-on-public-lands.html" rel="nofollow">where the people live and the power is needed</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-6539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-6539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fusion is the future.  Not fission.  Although they both are way better and greener than concentrated solar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fusion is the future.  Not fission.  Although they both are way better and greener than concentrated solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fusion is the future.  Not fission.  Although they both are way better and greener than concentrated solar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fusion is the future.  Not fission.  Although they both are way better and greener than concentrated solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fusion is the future.  Not fission.  Although they both are way better and greener than concentrated solar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fusion is the future.  Not fission.  Although they both are way better and greener than concentrated solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-6538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-6538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you mean fusion?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you mean fusion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you mean fusion?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you mean fusion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-6537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 08:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-6537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee! I thought we already had fission! And too many don&#039;t like it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee! I thought we already had fission! And too many don&#8217;t like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee! I thought we already had fission! And too many don&#039;t like it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee! I thought we already had fission! And too many don&#8217;t like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-6536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 04:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-6536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California is trying to make fission work.  It will happen eventually, and it is the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California is trying to make fission work.  It will happen eventually, and it is the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-22981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-22981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California is trying to make fission work.  It will happen eventually, and it is the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California is trying to make fission work.  It will happen eventually, and it is the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comment-6535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 09:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2604#comment-6535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small scale CSP on roof tops is similar to residential wind - lots of expense and little output. Good for the salesman and company but no one else.



Large scale is far cheaper, economical and is easier to maintain - cheaper to the consumer in the long run.



I would hazard a guess that much of the residential energy collecting equipment such as PV and wind (excluding solar hot water) will never save more energy or save more CO2 than was used in it&#039;s production.



Maybe PV will become more cost effective - someday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small scale CSP on roof tops is similar to residential wind &#8211; lots of expense and little output. Good for the salesman and company but no one else.</p>
<p>Large scale is far cheaper, economical and is easier to maintain &#8211; cheaper to the consumer in the long run.</p>
<p>I would hazard a guess that much of the residential energy collecting equipment such as PV and wind (excluding solar hot water) will never save more energy or save more CO2 than was used in it&#8217;s production.</p>
<p>Maybe PV will become more cost effective &#8211; someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
