Beyond Subsidized Solar Power: The Path to Grid Parity

If the silicon, wafer, cell and module manufacturers contribute to 60% of the cost reduction and the system integrators and BOS-manufacturers contribute to 40% of the cost reduction, the module price in 2013 for California would have to be $1.95/Watt DC and the system integration price (including all BOS components) $2.06/Watt in order to achieve the 7 year payback return without government incentives. The end customer price needs to be $4.01/Watt DC.

The above paragraph explains the price point for modules and installation price. On the cost side, the manufacturers need to reduce their cost to $1.51/watt DC and the system integration and BOS cost need to be at $1.42/Watt DC. These costs assume an average sales tax of 3% (an average aiming to account for the different sales tax rules for PV) and a gross profit margin expectation of 25% in the upstream segment and 18% in the downstream PV industry.

Reaching these objectives will require an aggressive cost roadmap, especially when taking into account that the above numbers are only representative of the best solar locations in the US.

Theoretically if we aggregate the most competitive manufacturers in the upstream value chain we can get the cost down to approximately $1.25/Watt. In addition, the best-of-class system integrators in the German market are able to install large PV system at a turnkey system price of below $5.00/Watt DC with standard modules.

Thus, grid parity and the ultimate goal of bringing solar to the mainstream are within our reach!

Image Credit: richardmasoner via Flickr under Creative Commons License

Pages: 1 2 3

  • mds

    First Solar (CdTe) and Nanosolar (CIGS) claim to have already acheived $1/Wp. Actually, they both claim to have bypassed this. They’re very busy selling to OEMs and installing their own PV power plants. (7.5 cents/kWh for First Solar’s plant with Sempra in Nevada. Half the price of power in S. California. Kaching!) We won’t see this for the retail end until supply has caught up with demand …and maybe this will have to happen more than once. There’s a long way for retail prices to fall. In the mean time, I’m sure balance-of-system (BOS, i.e. rectifiers, mounting frames, wiring, etc.) and installation costs will continue to go down as the market grows and the competition heats up.

    Basically, we already have the PV and Production technology for grid parity. We’re just waiting for production volume, BOS, and installation costs to catch up.

    PV is the cell phone of the energy market. Shoebox phone PV today. i-phone PV tomorrow.

    Most PV growth predictions will prove conservative in hindsight. Watch!

  • mds

    First Solar (CdTe) and Nanosolar (CIGS) claim to have already acheived $1/Wp. Actually, they both claim to have bypassed this. They’re very busy selling to OEMs and installing their own PV power plants. (7.5 cents/kWh for First Solar’s plant with Sempra in Nevada. Half the price of power in S. California. Kaching!) We won’t see this for the retail end until supply has caught up with demand …and maybe this will have to happen more than once. There’s a long way for retail prices to fall. In the mean time, I’m sure balance-of-system (BOS, i.e. rectifiers, mounting frames, wiring, etc.) and installation costs will continue to go down as the market grows and the competition heats up.

    Basically, we already have the PV and Production technology for grid parity. We’re just waiting for production volume, BOS, and installation costs to catch up.

    PV is the cell phone of the energy market. Shoebox phone PV today. i-phone PV tomorrow.

    Most PV growth predictions will prove conservative in hindsight. Watch!

  • Ryan

    Am I missing something here…

    100kW = 100 000W

    6.50$/W * 100 000W = 650 000$ ??? I know this isn’t correct, so what am I missing?

  • Ryan

    Am I missing something here…

    100kW = 100 000W

    6.50$/W * 100 000W = 650 000$ ??? I know this isn’t correct, so what am I missing?

  • Jagan Nemani

    Some very good points on the roadmap for price reduction and how Solar PV will acheive grid parity. Some points that were missed were around using metallurgical grade silicon. This has lower cost of production and hence can reduce the overall price of the PV system. We just have to figure out how to get good efficiencies out fo the metallurgical grade silicon.

    Does REC Solar have a position on Mettalurgical grade silicon?

  • Jagan Nemani

    Some very good points on the roadmap for price reduction and how Solar PV will acheive grid parity. Some points that were missed were around using metallurgical grade silicon. This has lower cost of production and hence can reduce the overall price of the PV system. We just have to figure out how to get good efficiencies out fo the metallurgical grade silicon.

    Does REC Solar have a position on Mettalurgical grade silicon?