Beyond Subsidized Solar Power: The Path to Grid Parity
Since retail electricity prices are expected to increase, these “grid-parity” prices will be higher in 2013. In order to achieve a 7 year payback time in 2013 [assuming an electricity rate escalator of 6% per year] the solar system price in 2013 needs to be around $4/Watt DC in California, $2.25/Watt DC in Colorado and $7.85/Watt DC (!) in Hawaii. For a 4.5 kW residential system where an 8-year payback is considered satisfactory, the non-incentive grid parity price in 2013 will be $5.30/Watt DC in California and $1.95/Watt DC in Colorado.
The point when grid parity can be reached depends largely on the electricity rates increase and the speed of cost reduction from both the manufacturers in the upstream solar market and the system integrators in the downstream segment.
In the past four years we have seen a significant module price increase due to the shortages of silicon supply. This trend will shift in the next few years where the increase of module supply will drive down the cost of solar electric systems.
The above data points show that grid parity will be first achieved in Southern California and Hawaii.
Even with the high electricity rates in both regions, the end-customer price in California still need to decline by 44% between today and 2013.
Most industry players believe that the cost reduction potential in the upstream solar market is larger given the fact that the solar industry saw module prices of $2.80/Watt DC in 2003 - which is significantly below today’s average price of XX.
Some very good points on the roadmap for price reduction and how Solar PV will acheive grid parity. Some points that were missed were around using metallurgical grade silicon. This has lower cost of production and hence can reduce the overall price of the PV system. We just have to figure out how to get good efficiencies out fo the metallurgical grade silicon.
Does REC Solar have a position on Mettalurgical grade silicon?
Am I missing something here…
100kW = 100 000W
6.50$/W * 100 000W = 650 000$ ??? I know this isn’t correct, so what am I missing?
First Solar (CdTe) and Nanosolar (CIGS) claim to have already acheived $1/Wp. Actually, they both claim to have bypassed this. They’re very busy selling to OEMs and installing their own PV power plants. (7.5 cents/kWh for First Solar’s plant with Sempra in Nevada. Half the price of power in S. California. Kaching!) We won’t see this for the retail end until supply has caught up with demand …and maybe this will have to happen more than once. There’s a long way for retail prices to fall. In the mean time, I’m sure balance-of-system (BOS, i.e. rectifiers, mounting frames, wiring, etc.) and installation costs will continue to go down as the market grows and the competition heats up.
Basically, we already have the PV and Production technology for grid parity. We’re just waiting for production volume, BOS, and installation costs to catch up.
PV is the cell phone of the energy market. Shoebox phone PV today. i-phone PV tomorrow.
Most PV growth predictions will prove conservative in hindsight. Watch!