<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam Wasted 33 Billion Kilowatt-Hours of Electricity in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/20/spam-wasted-33-billion-kilowatt-hours-of-electricity-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/20/spam-wasted-33-billion-kilowatt-hours-of-electricity-in-2008/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spammers Wasted 33 Billion Kilowatt-Hours of Electricity in 2008&#160;&#124;&#160;SpammyBlogger</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/20/spam-wasted-33-billion-kilowatt-hours-of-electricity-in-2008/#comment-5733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spammers Wasted 33 Billion Kilowatt-Hours of Electricity in 2008&#160;&#124;&#160;SpammyBlogger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2505#comment-5733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] posted at CleanTechnica] Conservationists have long been uncomfortable with the environmental impact of the mountains of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] posted at CleanTechnica] Conservationists have long been uncomfortable with the environmental impact of the mountains of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/20/spam-wasted-33-billion-kilowatt-hours-of-electricity-in-2008/#comment-5732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2505#comment-5732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Timothy this would be more meaningful if put into the context of wasted energy from other sources as well, say:



1. hamburgers, pizzas, MacMuffins - fast food in general

2. SMS which are just silly chat

3. time sitting in traffic jams

4. flying or other travel for no real reason

5. inserts (adds) in newspapers which are normally discarded without reading



Commercially the junk mail must be working for the parties putting it out or else they wouldn&#039;t be. If the junk had to pay their way (full post costs) then it would go way down.



One problem to me is that the focus of GW is often squandered with loose irrelevant tidbits - some real and some silly.



The loose &#039;facts&#039; and silly stuff sometimes make the concept of GW laughable to some and less important to others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy this would be more meaningful if put into the context of wasted energy from other sources as well, say:</p>
<p>1. hamburgers, pizzas, MacMuffins &#8211; fast food in general</p>
<p>2. SMS which are just silly chat</p>
<p>3. time sitting in traffic jams</p>
<p>4. flying or other travel for no real reason</p>
<p>5. inserts (adds) in newspapers which are normally discarded without reading</p>
<p>Commercially the junk mail must be working for the parties putting it out or else they wouldn&#8217;t be. If the junk had to pay their way (full post costs) then it would go way down.</p>
<p>One problem to me is that the focus of GW is often squandered with loose irrelevant tidbits &#8211; some real and some silly.</p>
<p>The loose &#8216;facts&#8217; and silly stuff sometimes make the concept of GW laughable to some and less important to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/04/20/spam-wasted-33-billion-kilowatt-hours-of-electricity-in-2008/#comment-22762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2505#comment-22762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Timothy this would be more meaningful if put into the context of wasted energy from other sources as well, say:



1. hamburgers, pizzas, MacMuffins - fast food in general

2. SMS which are just silly chat

3. time sitting in traffic jams

4. flying or other travel for no real reason

5. inserts (adds) in newspapers which are normally discarded without reading



Commercially the junk mail must be working for the parties putting it out or else they wouldn&#039;t be. If the junk had to pay their way (full post costs) then it would go way down.



One problem to me is that the focus of GW is often squandered with loose irrelevant tidbits - some real and some silly.



The loose &#039;facts&#039; and silly stuff sometimes make the concept of GW laughable to some and less important to others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy this would be more meaningful if put into the context of wasted energy from other sources as well, say:</p>
<p>1. hamburgers, pizzas, MacMuffins &#8211; fast food in general</p>
<p>2. SMS which are just silly chat</p>
<p>3. time sitting in traffic jams</p>
<p>4. flying or other travel for no real reason</p>
<p>5. inserts (adds) in newspapers which are normally discarded without reading</p>
<p>Commercially the junk mail must be working for the parties putting it out or else they wouldn&#8217;t be. If the junk had to pay their way (full post costs) then it would go way down.</p>
<p>One problem to me is that the focus of GW is often squandered with loose irrelevant tidbits &#8211; some real and some silly.</p>
<p>The loose &#8216;facts&#8217; and silly stuff sometimes make the concept of GW laughable to some and less important to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
