Solar energy is being diverted to the earth that would normally pass it by.

This idea certainly would cause man made global warming since the earth would be receiving more solar energy than it would naturally. It doesn’t matter that it’s being converted to radio waves for transmission. Energy is energy. It cannot be created or destroyed. Once that extra energy is here on earth, it’s up to the earth to rid itself of it. There’s no debating that this idea would cause man made global warming.

There are already sufficient amounts of solar energy hitting the earth’s surface that we can harness. What we need to work on is better energy storage. There exists today upper and lower reservoirs where water is pumped up when demand is low, and allowed to flow down to produce electricity when the demand is high.

We need smaller residential type systems so that the stored energy is close to the consumer, reducing the need for transmission lines over long distances. I don’t like the idea of conventional batteries because you have to dispose of them when they die. A system of electrolyzing water, storage and fuel cell would be more desirable.

I really hope this idea gets shut down before any large amounts of money are wasted on it.

Solar energy is being diverted to the earth that would normally pass it by.

This idea certainly would cause man made global warming since the earth would be receiving more solar energy than it would naturally. It doesn’t matter that it’s being converted to radio waves for transmission. Energy is energy. It cannot be created or destroyed. Once that extra energy is here on earth, it’s up to the earth to rid itself of it. There’s no debating that this idea would cause man made global warming.

There are already sufficient amounts of solar energy hitting the earth’s surface that we can harness. What we need to work on is better energy storage. There exists today upper and lower reservoirs where water is pumped up when demand is low, and allowed to flow down to produce electricity when the demand is high.

We need smaller residential type systems so that the stored energy is close to the consumer, reducing the need for transmission lines over long distances. I don’t like the idea of conventional batteries because you have to dispose of them when they die. A system of electrolyzing water, storage and fuel cell would be more desirable.

I really hope this idea gets shut down before any large amounts of money are wasted on it.

make their concept a scam !!

make their concept a scam !!

Space debris

politics?

Too few Spaceplanes

Time to R&D spaceplanes

Building array- but use ISS as Experience base

Funding

Pvt venture

& Next Lunar Mining.

& need Improved fuels for rockets into Space

or Space elevators

In space Nuclear rockets?

Field Resonance drive spacecraft

Ion drive.

Controlling space solar array

hackers into system

Otherwise doable & be a super Job source alone

Space debris

politics?

Too few Spaceplanes

Time to R&D spaceplanes

Building array- but use ISS as Experience base

Funding

Pvt venture

& Next Lunar Mining.

& need Improved fuels for rockets into Space

or Space elevators

In space Nuclear rockets?

Field Resonance drive spacecraft

Ion drive.

Controlling space solar array

hackers into system

Otherwise doable & be a super Job source alone

Orbital Station for work crews & then later maint cres

EV Pods

Spaceplanes- NOT space shuttles

SSTO shuttle rockets

Launch sites

Recovery sites

& Markets for Space Solar Power to:

The Globe

Or No Mexico, Chile, Argentina, So Africa, NZ, Norway, Sweden etc.

Orbital Station for work crews & then later maint cres

EV Pods

Spaceplanes- NOT space shuttles

SSTO shuttle rockets

Launch sites

Recovery sites

& Markets for Space Solar Power to:

The Globe

Or No Mexico, Chile, Argentina, So Africa, NZ, Norway, Sweden etc.

On a more serious note, I’m also curious to know about the conversion losses, news releases always seem to leave out the most important parts (not necessarily CT’s fault).

On a more serious note, I’m also curious to know about the conversion losses, news releases always seem to leave out the most important parts (not necessarily CT’s fault).

The facts (as known today) about this would go far to giving it credibility.

The facts (as known today) about this would go far to giving it credibility.

They also mentioned 6-8 times more efficient but I would appreciate if they would discuss the conversion losses. This is the third blog I’ve seen this mentioned but nobody knows the conversion losses.