<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fremont&#8217;s Solyndra Wins First DoE Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Showcase Solar Company Solyndra Files for Bankruptcy &#124; CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/#comment-104194</link>
		<dc:creator>Showcase Solar Company Solyndra Files for Bankruptcy &#124; CleanTechnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2373#comment-104194</guid>
		<description>[...] a California solar panel maker &#8212; once a showcase for the Obama administration’s attempt to create clean energy jobs &#8212; stopped operating Wednesday as it filed for bankruptcy protection. In the wake of its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a California solar panel maker &#8212; once a showcase for the Obama administration’s attempt to create clean energy jobs &#8212; stopped operating Wednesday as it filed for bankruptcy protection. In the wake of its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/#comment-103962</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2373#comment-103962</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on being right.  I bet the author is still drinking the kool-aid though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on being right.  I bet the author is still drinking the kool-aid though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solyndra&#8217;s Latest Install Will Make 1,360 MWH Annually for France &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/#comment-54842</link>
		<dc:creator>Solyndra&#8217;s Latest Install Will Make 1,360 MWH Annually for France &#8211; CleanTechnica: Cleantech innovation news and views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2373#comment-54842</guid>
		<description>[...] at home, Solyndra is under heavy criticism for receiving support from the Obama administration in 2009 and yet subsequently having to cut back on its employee numbers (by between 20 and 40, out of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at home, Solyndra is under heavy criticism for receiving support from the Obama administration in 2009 and yet subsequently having to cut back on its employee numbers (by between 20 and 40, out of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam starr</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/#comment-5305</link>
		<dc:creator>adam starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2373#comment-5305</guid>
		<description>Taxpayers shouldn&#039;t be asked to back high risk VC investments. Leave that to the VCs. &quot;Sol&quot; is right that the money should go to make a market and let the VCs chase the market. Solyndra is all smoke and mirrors. The modules are less than 8% efficiency and the cost to make them on tubes is much higher than on flat window glass. They will never make a profit. The only question is who will be left holding the bag when the company finally collapses. Looks like the VCs just got bailed out by the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxpayers shouldn&#8217;t be asked to back high risk VC investments. Leave that to the VCs. &#8220;Sol&#8221; is right that the money should go to make a market and let the VCs chase the market. Solyndra is all smoke and mirrors. The modules are less than 8% efficiency and the cost to make them on tubes is much higher than on flat window glass. They will never make a profit. The only question is who will be left holding the bag when the company finally collapses. Looks like the VCs just got bailed out by the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam starr</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/#comment-22518</link>
		<dc:creator>adam starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2373#comment-22518</guid>
		<description>Taxpayers shouldn&#039;t be asked to back high risk VC investments. Leave that to the VCs. &quot;Sol&quot; is right that the money should go to make a market and let the VCs chase the market. Solyndra is all smoke and mirrors. The modules are less than 8% efficiency and the cost to make them on tubes is much higher than on flat window glass. They will never make a profit. The only question is who will be left holding the bag when the company finally collapses. Looks like the VCs just got bailed out by the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxpayers shouldn&#8217;t be asked to back high risk VC investments. Leave that to the VCs. &#8220;Sol&#8221; is right that the money should go to make a market and let the VCs chase the market. Solyndra is all smoke and mirrors. The modules are less than 8% efficiency and the cost to make them on tubes is much higher than on flat window glass. They will never make a profit. The only question is who will be left holding the bag when the company finally collapses. Looks like the VCs just got bailed out by the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/#comment-5304</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2373#comment-5304</guid>
		<description>What Bob said: - I am hardly a columnist, indeed I work for another solar company, but I can attest that millions, (or even pennies) have not been paid to me, nor the old friend that I got the inside story from.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Bob said: &#8211; I am hardly a columnist, indeed I work for another solar company, but I can attest that millions, (or even pennies) have not been paid to me, nor the old friend that I got the inside story from.<br />
 <img src='http://c1cleantechnicacom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/#comment-22517</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2373#comment-22517</guid>
		<description>What Bob said: - I am hardly a columnist, indeed I work for another solar company, but I can attest that millions, (or even pennies) have not been paid to me, nor the old friend that I got the inside story from.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Bob said: &#8211; I am hardly a columnist, indeed I work for another solar company, but I can attest that millions, (or even pennies) have not been paid to me, nor the old friend that I got the inside story from.<br />
 <img src='http://c1cleantechnicacom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/#comment-5303</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2373#comment-5303</guid>
		<description>@eh - I am close to Solyndra. Millions HAVE NOT been spent in marketing or paying columnists. Quite the contrary. Know your facts before posting such info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@eh &#8211; I am close to Solyndra. Millions HAVE NOT been spent in marketing or paying columnists. Quite the contrary. Know your facts before posting such info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/#comment-22516</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2373#comment-22516</guid>
		<description>@eh - I am close to Solyndra. Millions HAVE NOT been spent in marketing or paying columnists. Quite the contrary. Know your facts before posting such info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@eh &#8211; I am close to Solyndra. Millions HAVE NOT been spent in marketing or paying columnists. Quite the contrary. Know your facts before posting such info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sol</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/21/fremonts-solyndra-wins-first-doe-funding/#comment-5302</link>
		<dc:creator>sol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2373#comment-5302</guid>
		<description>We shouldn&#039;t be allocating this money to young startup companies with significant execution risk. Even if they are successful they will only pour more panels into an oversupplied market. These loan guarantees should be focused on project developers who can take advantage of this oversupply of modules and will be far lower risk investments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We shouldn&#8217;t be allocating this money to young startup companies with significant execution risk. Even if they are successful they will only pour more panels into an oversupplied market. These loan guarantees should be focused on project developers who can take advantage of this oversupply of modules and will be far lower risk investments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

