<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coal Power: Now With Chocolatey Goodness?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/04/coal-power-now-with-chocolatey-goodness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/04/coal-power-now-with-chocolatey-goodness/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Tyler</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/04/coal-power-now-with-chocolatey-goodness/#comment-5576</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2267#comment-5576</guid>
		<description>@jak: Apparently there is some use of this method in Europe. I&#039;m really not sure what the results have been there. I&#039;m a bit skeptical of the benefits myself. I&#039;ll be watching to see what they say about the results of Tuesday&#039;s test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jak: Apparently there is some use of this method in Europe. I&#8217;m really not sure what the results have been there. I&#8217;m a bit skeptical of the benefits myself. I&#8217;ll be watching to see what they say about the results of Tuesday&#8217;s test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jak</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/04/coal-power-now-with-chocolatey-goodness/#comment-5575</link>
		<dc:creator>jak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2267#comment-5575</guid>
		<description>Is there any science behind this? Does the cocoa do something chemically? Is it just a thought that lowering coal percentage is cleaner?  It seems fine to dispose of waste this way, but it may not really be green.  Perhaps it would be better to produce ethanol with the waste?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any science behind this? Does the cocoa do something chemically? Is it just a thought that lowering coal percentage is cleaner?  It seems fine to dispose of waste this way, but it may not really be green.  Perhaps it would be better to produce ethanol with the waste?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jak</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/04/coal-power-now-with-chocolatey-goodness/#comment-22413</link>
		<dc:creator>jak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2267#comment-22413</guid>
		<description>Is there any science behind this? Does the cocoa do something chemically? Is it just a thought that lowering coal percentage is cleaner?  It seems fine to dispose of waste this way, but it may not really be green.  Perhaps it would be better to produce ethanol with the waste?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any science behind this? Does the cocoa do something chemically? Is it just a thought that lowering coal percentage is cleaner?  It seems fine to dispose of waste this way, but it may not really be green.  Perhaps it would be better to produce ethanol with the waste?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/04/coal-power-now-with-chocolatey-goodness/#comment-5574</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2267#comment-5574</guid>
		<description>And to stop using as much energy as we are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to stop using as much energy as we are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/04/coal-power-now-with-chocolatey-goodness/#comment-22412</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2267#comment-22412</guid>
		<description>And to stop using as much energy as we are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to stop using as much energy as we are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mdan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/04/coal-power-now-with-chocolatey-goodness/#comment-5573</link>
		<dc:creator>Mdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2267#comment-5573</guid>
		<description>yeah, that kind of 33:1 ratio isn&#039;t really going to make much of an impact on air quality, that&#039;s for sure. time to start thinking about ways of reprocessing nuclear fuel and getting the U.S.&#039;s nuclear industry on par with what&#039;s going on in Europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, that kind of 33:1 ratio isn&#8217;t really going to make much of an impact on air quality, that&#8217;s for sure. time to start thinking about ways of reprocessing nuclear fuel and getting the U.S.&#8217;s nuclear industry on par with what&#8217;s going on in Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mdan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/04/coal-power-now-with-chocolatey-goodness/#comment-22411</link>
		<dc:creator>Mdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2267#comment-22411</guid>
		<description>yeah, that kind of 33:1 ratio isn&#039;t really going to make much of an impact on air quality, that&#039;s for sure. time to start thinking about ways of reprocessing nuclear fuel and getting the U.S.&#039;s nuclear industry on par with what&#039;s going on in Europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, that kind of 33:1 ratio isn&#8217;t really going to make much of an impact on air quality, that&#8217;s for sure. time to start thinking about ways of reprocessing nuclear fuel and getting the U.S.&#8217;s nuclear industry on par with what&#8217;s going on in Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

