Coal Power: Now With Chocolatey Goodness?
Yes, chocolate is oh-so tasty and good. And we’ve heard that there may be health benefits to consuming the stuff in doses. You can power a truck with it. You can even promote peace with it. But can a byproduct from the process actually help coal burn cleaner?
Lindt USA and a New Hampshire utility are running tests to find out, the Associated Press reports. The chocolate maker and Public Service of New Hampshire mixed cocoa bean shells with coal Tuesday at the utility’s Schiller Station plant in Portsmouth to see how the mixture burned. The test used 18 tons of shells, in a ratio of 33 parts coal to one part cocoa.
The goal, Lindt and the utility said, is to see if the mixture produces a cleaner burn than just coal.
- » See also: Wave Energy Looking for Breakthrough — Using Aerospace Design
- » Get CleanTechnica by RSS or sign up by email.
“We’re hoping for no change or less in the emissions, so it will be win-win situation for everyone,” Felicia Giordano, senior environmental coordinator for Schiller, told Seacoast Online. “In this day and age this is a step in the right direction for a cleaner future for New Hampshire.”
In 2010, Lindt, based in nearby Stratham, will open a bean roasting plant. The chocolate maker could wind up shipping shells to the coal plant on a regular basis. It would be the first arrangement of its kind in the U.S., officials said.
Of course it remains to be seen just how much cleaner the mixture burns. Consultants spent the day testing emissions and it’s not immediately clear when results will be available. But the mixture is still 33 parts coal to one part shells, so it’s hard to imagine results will be too radically different. And after all, we’re still talking about burning coal. You can cover the coal in a scrumptious chocolate shell, but it’s still coal.
Photo Credit: ccho’s flickr stream, under a Creative Commons License.
yeah, that kind of 33:1 ratio isn’t really going to make much of an impact on air quality, that’s for sure. time to start thinking about ways of reprocessing nuclear fuel and getting the U.S.’s nuclear industry on par with what’s going on in Europe.
And to stop using as much energy as we are…
Is there any science behind this? Does the cocoa do something chemically? Is it just a thought that lowering coal percentage is cleaner? It seems fine to dispose of waste this way, but it may not really be green. Perhaps it would be better to produce ethanol with the waste?
@jak: Apparently there is some use of this method in Europe. I’m really not sure what the results have been there. I’m a bit skeptical of the benefits myself. I’ll be watching to see what they say about the results of Tuesday’s test.