<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World&#039;s First Fuel Cell Tractor Debuts in Italy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreaming to be a farmer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/#comment-5193</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreaming to be a farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2154#comment-5193</guid>
		<description>Using what is called (sorry for this direct translation from my native language) &quot;simplified cultivation techniques&quot; (no tillage, for example), wouldn&#039;t a tractor require less horsepower and gain as much autonomy?



Wouldn&#039;t a &quot;photovoltaic solar panels &gt; hydrogen generator by water catalysis &gt; compressor&quot; production chain suffice for the needs of such a low powered tractor, considering average milking breeders consumption in european family farming for example?



Is it utopian expecting massive cost reduction along with mass production for fuel cells? And also better performances (in particular using pure hydrogen produced by means of water catalysis?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using what is called (sorry for this direct translation from my native language) &#8220;simplified cultivation techniques&#8221; (no tillage, for example), wouldn&#8217;t a tractor require less horsepower and gain as much autonomy?</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a &#8220;photovoltaic solar panels &gt; hydrogen generator by water catalysis &gt; compressor&#8221; production chain suffice for the needs of such a low powered tractor, considering average milking breeders consumption in european family farming for example?</p>
<p>Is it utopian expecting massive cost reduction along with mass production for fuel cells? And also better performances (in particular using pure hydrogen produced by means of water catalysis?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreaming to be a farmer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/#comment-22272</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreaming to be a farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2154#comment-22272</guid>
		<description>Using what is called (sorry for this direct translation from my native language) &quot;simplified cultivation techniques&quot; (no tillage, for example), wouldn&#039;t a tractor require less horsepower and gain as much autonomy?



Wouldn&#039;t a &quot;photovoltaic solar panels &gt; hydrogen generator by water catalysis &gt; compressor&quot; production chain suffice for the needs of such a low powered tractor, considering average milking breeders consumption in european family farming for example?



Is it utopian expecting massive cost reduction along with mass production for fuel cells? And also better performances (in particular using pure hydrogen produced by means of water catalysis?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using what is called (sorry for this direct translation from my native language) &#8220;simplified cultivation techniques&#8221; (no tillage, for example), wouldn&#8217;t a tractor require less horsepower and gain as much autonomy?</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a &#8220;photovoltaic solar panels &gt; hydrogen generator by water catalysis &gt; compressor&#8221; production chain suffice for the needs of such a low powered tractor, considering average milking breeders consumption in european family farming for example?</p>
<p>Is it utopian expecting massive cost reduction along with mass production for fuel cells? And also better performances (in particular using pure hydrogen produced by means of water catalysis?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Former Farmer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/#comment-5192</link>
		<dc:creator>A Former Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2154#comment-5192</guid>
		<description>As Rob pointed out, this is not the first fuel cell tractor. Allis-Chalmers was so far ahead of most other ag tractor outfits that people have forgotten just how far advanced they were. Allis started putting turbos onto tractor engines (the D-19, 1961 I think) when other farm equipment companies were still wondering why anyone not flying at high altitude wanted one on an engine.



This fuel cell machine is rather far off the mark of a usable tractor, it has a very long way to go to be viable in the market.



A 105HP* tractor, with moderate bells and whistles, would probably run about $120K, new. Here, they&#039;re talking about 300K UKP just for the fuel cell. For the cost of the whole tractor (probably closer to 400K UKP) you could buy two larger tractors than this and a planter or other piece of essential equipment.



On a diesel machine, you should be able to fill the diesel tank in the morning and run for 8 to 14 hours before needing to fill it again.



Pressurizing H2 to 350 bar (&gt; 5,000 psi) is a feat in and of itself, and will require quite a bit of energy, not to mention time and special fittings to accomplish when re-filling the tractor. During planting and harvest times, it isn&#039;t unusual for a farmer to be pushing nearly 24 hours a day to get the job done, and time spent dawdling while re-filling a tractor is time not spent in the field. Our diesel pumps would pump at about 12GPM (about twice as fast as a retail gas pump) and it would still take 10 minutes to fill the fuel tank on most 150HP tractors. For the bigger machines, they use 30+GPM pumps. Many farmers will have a diesel tank in the back of their farm pickup to bring 90 or so gallons out to the edge of the field along with other supplies to be able to refill the fuel tank without going back up to the farmstead. That&#039;s not going to be easily possible if we&#039;re talking of filling a tank to 350 bar.



It&#039;s a nice idea, but the gap between what a lot of &quot;green&quot; engineers think farmers need and what farmers actually need is huge and growing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Rob pointed out, this is not the first fuel cell tractor. Allis-Chalmers was so far ahead of most other ag tractor outfits that people have forgotten just how far advanced they were. Allis started putting turbos onto tractor engines (the D-19, 1961 I think) when other farm equipment companies were still wondering why anyone not flying at high altitude wanted one on an engine.</p>
<p>This fuel cell machine is rather far off the mark of a usable tractor, it has a very long way to go to be viable in the market.</p>
<p>A 105HP* tractor, with moderate bells and whistles, would probably run about $120K, new. Here, they&#8217;re talking about 300K UKP just for the fuel cell. For the cost of the whole tractor (probably closer to 400K UKP) you could buy two larger tractors than this and a planter or other piece of essential equipment.</p>
<p>On a diesel machine, you should be able to fill the diesel tank in the morning and run for 8 to 14 hours before needing to fill it again.</p>
<p>Pressurizing H2 to 350 bar (&gt; 5,000 psi) is a feat in and of itself, and will require quite a bit of energy, not to mention time and special fittings to accomplish when re-filling the tractor. During planting and harvest times, it isn&#8217;t unusual for a farmer to be pushing nearly 24 hours a day to get the job done, and time spent dawdling while re-filling a tractor is time not spent in the field. Our diesel pumps would pump at about 12GPM (about twice as fast as a retail gas pump) and it would still take 10 minutes to fill the fuel tank on most 150HP tractors. For the bigger machines, they use 30+GPM pumps. Many farmers will have a diesel tank in the back of their farm pickup to bring 90 or so gallons out to the edge of the field along with other supplies to be able to refill the fuel tank without going back up to the farmstead. That&#8217;s not going to be easily possible if we&#8217;re talking of filling a tank to 350 bar.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a nice idea, but the gap between what a lot of &#8220;green&#8221; engineers think farmers need and what farmers actually need is huge and growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Former Farmer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/#comment-22271</link>
		<dc:creator>A Former Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2154#comment-22271</guid>
		<description>As Rob pointed out, this is not the first fuel cell tractor. Allis-Chalmers was so far ahead of most other ag tractor outfits that people have forgotten just how far advanced they were. Allis started putting turbos onto tractor engines (the D-19, 1961 I think) when other farm equipment companies were still wondering why anyone not flying at high altitude wanted one on an engine.



This fuel cell machine is rather far off the mark of a usable tractor, it has a very long way to go to be viable in the market.



A 105HP* tractor, with moderate bells and whistles, would probably run about $120K, new. Here, they&#039;re talking about 300K UKP just for the fuel cell. For the cost of the whole tractor (probably closer to 400K UKP) you could buy two larger tractors than this and a planter or other piece of essential equipment.



On a diesel machine, you should be able to fill the diesel tank in the morning and run for 8 to 14 hours before needing to fill it again.



Pressurizing H2 to 350 bar (&gt; 5,000 psi) is a feat in and of itself, and will require quite a bit of energy, not to mention time and special fittings to accomplish when re-filling the tractor. During planting and harvest times, it isn&#039;t unusual for a farmer to be pushing nearly 24 hours a day to get the job done, and time spent dawdling while re-filling a tractor is time not spent in the field. Our diesel pumps would pump at about 12GPM (about twice as fast as a retail gas pump) and it would still take 10 minutes to fill the fuel tank on most 150HP tractors. For the bigger machines, they use 30+GPM pumps. Many farmers will have a diesel tank in the back of their farm pickup to bring 90 or so gallons out to the edge of the field along with other supplies to be able to refill the fuel tank without going back up to the farmstead. That&#039;s not going to be easily possible if we&#039;re talking of filling a tank to 350 bar.



It&#039;s a nice idea, but the gap between what a lot of &quot;green&quot; engineers think farmers need and what farmers actually need is huge and growing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Rob pointed out, this is not the first fuel cell tractor. Allis-Chalmers was so far ahead of most other ag tractor outfits that people have forgotten just how far advanced they were. Allis started putting turbos onto tractor engines (the D-19, 1961 I think) when other farm equipment companies were still wondering why anyone not flying at high altitude wanted one on an engine.</p>
<p>This fuel cell machine is rather far off the mark of a usable tractor, it has a very long way to go to be viable in the market.</p>
<p>A 105HP* tractor, with moderate bells and whistles, would probably run about $120K, new. Here, they&#8217;re talking about 300K UKP just for the fuel cell. For the cost of the whole tractor (probably closer to 400K UKP) you could buy two larger tractors than this and a planter or other piece of essential equipment.</p>
<p>On a diesel machine, you should be able to fill the diesel tank in the morning and run for 8 to 14 hours before needing to fill it again.</p>
<p>Pressurizing H2 to 350 bar (&gt; 5,000 psi) is a feat in and of itself, and will require quite a bit of energy, not to mention time and special fittings to accomplish when re-filling the tractor. During planting and harvest times, it isn&#8217;t unusual for a farmer to be pushing nearly 24 hours a day to get the job done, and time spent dawdling while re-filling a tractor is time not spent in the field. Our diesel pumps would pump at about 12GPM (about twice as fast as a retail gas pump) and it would still take 10 minutes to fill the fuel tank on most 150HP tractors. For the bigger machines, they use 30+GPM pumps. Many farmers will have a diesel tank in the back of their farm pickup to bring 90 or so gallons out to the edge of the field along with other supplies to be able to refill the fuel tank without going back up to the farmstead. That&#8217;s not going to be easily possible if we&#8217;re talking of filling a tank to 350 bar.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a nice idea, but the gap between what a lot of &#8220;green&#8221; engineers think farmers need and what farmers actually need is huge and growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Brown</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/#comment-5191</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2154#comment-5191</guid>
		<description>Two hours? No. 1 1/2 hours max. You&#039;d need that extra (?) 1/2 hour to get back for the refill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two hours? No. 1 1/2 hours max. You&#8217;d need that extra (?) 1/2 hour to get back for the refill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Brown</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/#comment-22270</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2154#comment-22270</guid>
		<description>Two hours? No. 1 1/2 hours max. You&#039;d need that extra (?) 1/2 hour to get back for the refill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two hours? No. 1 1/2 hours max. You&#8217;d need that extra (?) 1/2 hour to get back for the refill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rignerd</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/#comment-5190</link>
		<dc:creator>Rignerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2154#comment-5190</guid>
		<description>106 HP, 2 hour max run time and 300K euros for the cell alone.



If you were growing Opium, coca, and Marijuana you might be able to make a farm profitable with a tractor like that, otherwise you will need massive government subsidies.  Wouldn&#039;t a biogas or boi fuel tractor make much better sense, then you can use your own farms waste products to fuel the machinery that produces the crop.



Green products will succeed in the market place when they are more efficient at doing the job of the equipment they hope to replace.  Until then they are a way to get government grants and waste tax payers dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>106 HP, 2 hour max run time and 300K euros for the cell alone.</p>
<p>If you were growing Opium, coca, and Marijuana you might be able to make a farm profitable with a tractor like that, otherwise you will need massive government subsidies.  Wouldn&#8217;t a biogas or boi fuel tractor make much better sense, then you can use your own farms waste products to fuel the machinery that produces the crop.</p>
<p>Green products will succeed in the market place when they are more efficient at doing the job of the equipment they hope to replace.  Until then they are a way to get government grants and waste tax payers dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rignerd</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/#comment-22269</link>
		<dc:creator>Rignerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2154#comment-22269</guid>
		<description>106 HP, 2 hour max run time and 300K euros for the cell alone.



If you were growing Opium, coca, and Marijuana you might be able to make a farm profitable with a tractor like that, otherwise you will need massive government subsidies.  Wouldn&#039;t a biogas or boi fuel tractor make much better sense, then you can use your own farms waste products to fuel the machinery that produces the crop.



Green products will succeed in the market place when they are more efficient at doing the job of the equipment they hope to replace.  Until then they are a way to get government grants and waste tax payers dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>106 HP, 2 hour max run time and 300K euros for the cell alone.</p>
<p>If you were growing Opium, coca, and Marijuana you might be able to make a farm profitable with a tractor like that, otherwise you will need massive government subsidies.  Wouldn&#8217;t a biogas or boi fuel tractor make much better sense, then you can use your own farms waste products to fuel the machinery that produces the crop.</p>
<p>Green products will succeed in the market place when they are more efficient at doing the job of the equipment they hope to replace.  Until then they are a way to get government grants and waste tax payers dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Privette</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/#comment-5189</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Privette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2154#comment-5189</guid>
		<description>This is certainly not the first fuel cell tractor!  You have to go back at least to the 1950&#039;s for the first fuel cell tractor.



See http://americanhistory.si.edu/fuelcells/alk/alkmain.htm



&quot;One of the first of these demonstrations consisted of a 1959 Allis-Chalmers farm tractor powered by a stack of 1,008 cells. With 15,000 watts of power, the tractor generated enough power to pull a weight of about 3,000 pounds. (The tractor was later donated to the Smithsonian.) Allis-Chalmers maintained a research program for some years, building a fuel cell powered golf cart, submersible, and fork lift. The U.S. Air Force also participated in this program. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is certainly not the first fuel cell tractor!  You have to go back at least to the 1950&#8242;s for the first fuel cell tractor.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://americanhistory.si.edu/fuelcells/alk/alkmain.htm" rel="nofollow">http://americanhistory.si.edu/fuelcells/alk/alkmain.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8220;One of the first of these demonstrations consisted of a 1959 Allis-Chalmers farm tractor powered by a stack of 1,008 cells. With 15,000 watts of power, the tractor generated enough power to pull a weight of about 3,000 pounds. (The tractor was later donated to the Smithsonian.) Allis-Chalmers maintained a research program for some years, building a fuel cell powered golf cart, submersible, and fork lift. The U.S. Air Force also participated in this program. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Privette</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/02/11/worlds-first-fuel-cell-tractor-debuts-in-italy/#comment-22268</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Privette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=2154#comment-22268</guid>
		<description>This is certainly not the first fuel cell tractor!  You have to go back at least to the 1950&#039;s for the first fuel cell tractor.



See http://americanhistory.si.edu/fuelcells/alk/alkmain.htm



&quot;One of the first of these demonstrations consisted of a 1959 Allis-Chalmers farm tractor powered by a stack of 1,008 cells. With 15,000 watts of power, the tractor generated enough power to pull a weight of about 3,000 pounds. (The tractor was later donated to the Smithsonian.) Allis-Chalmers maintained a research program for some years, building a fuel cell powered golf cart, submersible, and fork lift. The U.S. Air Force also participated in this program. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is certainly not the first fuel cell tractor!  You have to go back at least to the 1950&#8242;s for the first fuel cell tractor.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://americanhistory.si.edu/fuelcells/alk/alkmain.htm" rel="nofollow">http://americanhistory.si.edu/fuelcells/alk/alkmain.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8220;One of the first of these demonstrations consisted of a 1959 Allis-Chalmers farm tractor powered by a stack of 1,008 cells. With 15,000 watts of power, the tractor generated enough power to pull a weight of about 3,000 pounds. (The tractor was later donated to the Smithsonian.) Allis-Chalmers maintained a research program for some years, building a fuel cell powered golf cart, submersible, and fork lift. The U.S. Air Force also participated in this program. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

