<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SeaGen Shatters Tidal Power Generation Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/18/seagen-shatters-tidal-power-generation-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/18/seagen-shatters-tidal-power-generation-record/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Renwooller</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/18/seagen-shatters-tidal-power-generation-record/#comment-111656</link>
		<dc:creator>Renwooller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1736#comment-111656</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s in the ocean, not in a river</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s in the ocean, not in a river</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G2</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/18/seagen-shatters-tidal-power-generation-record/#comment-3946</link>
		<dc:creator>G2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1736#comment-3946</guid>
		<description>It is a tidal stream turbine, not a tidal barrage.  This means that it does not hold back the water and so should have a far lower environmental impact than a barrage.  At La Rance there have been ecological changes in the estuary.  With tidal stream it is hoped - but not yet proven - that there will be no impact at all.  Read the website for the project and you will find it is deliberately sited near very sensitive ecology such as a seal colony.  Part of their tests is whether the seals are injured by the blades and whether there are the feared cavitation noises from the blades that affect dolphin sonar.  They have undertaken to shut down if they are causing ecological damage.  Wish there were more projects which took this responsible attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a tidal stream turbine, not a tidal barrage.  This means that it does not hold back the water and so should have a far lower environmental impact than a barrage.  At La Rance there have been ecological changes in the estuary.  With tidal stream it is hoped &#8211; but not yet proven &#8211; that there will be no impact at all.  Read the website for the project and you will find it is deliberately sited near very sensitive ecology such as a seal colony.  Part of their tests is whether the seals are injured by the blades and whether there are the feared cavitation noises from the blades that affect dolphin sonar.  They have undertaken to shut down if they are causing ecological damage.  Wish there were more projects which took this responsible attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G2</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/18/seagen-shatters-tidal-power-generation-record/#comment-21410</link>
		<dc:creator>G2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1736#comment-21410</guid>
		<description>It is a tidal stream turbine, not a tidal barrage.  This means that it does not hold back the water and so should have a far lower environmental impact than a barrage.  At La Rance there have been ecological changes in the estuary.  With tidal stream it is hoped - but not yet proven - that there will be no impact at all.  Read the website for the project and you will find it is deliberately sited near very sensitive ecology such as a seal colony.  Part of their tests is whether the seals are injured by the blades and whether there are the feared cavitation noises from the blades that affect dolphin sonar.  They have undertaken to shut down if they are causing ecological damage.  Wish there were more projects which took this responsible attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a tidal stream turbine, not a tidal barrage.  This means that it does not hold back the water and so should have a far lower environmental impact than a barrage.  At La Rance there have been ecological changes in the estuary.  With tidal stream it is hoped &#8211; but not yet proven &#8211; that there will be no impact at all.  Read the website for the project and you will find it is deliberately sited near very sensitive ecology such as a seal colony.  Part of their tests is whether the seals are injured by the blades and whether there are the feared cavitation noises from the blades that affect dolphin sonar.  They have undertaken to shut down if they are causing ecological damage.  Wish there were more projects which took this responsible attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aquarius</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/18/seagen-shatters-tidal-power-generation-record/#comment-3945</link>
		<dc:creator>Aquarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1736#comment-3945</guid>
		<description>In what way (aside from an obviously more modern technology) is this any different from the 240MW tidal power plant of the Rance river in France ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what way (aside from an obviously more modern technology) is this any different from the 240MW tidal power plant of the Rance river in France ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aquarius</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/18/seagen-shatters-tidal-power-generation-record/#comment-21409</link>
		<dc:creator>Aquarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1736#comment-21409</guid>
		<description>In what way (aside from an obviously more modern technology) is this any different from the 240MW tidal power plant of the Rance river in France ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what way (aside from an obviously more modern technology) is this any different from the 240MW tidal power plant of the Rance river in France ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

