Comments on: Waterpod Floating House Points to a Nomadic Future After Global Warming http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/ Clean Tech News & Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. & More. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ed http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/#comment-3889 ed Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:57:39 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1718#comment-3889 Maybe the science isnt exact, but the main thing we cant deny is that we have impacted the earth negatively, more in the last 40 years than in the last 4000 years, which makes it more than a trend. If we continue to ignore that, we will all suffer, and so will our children. Maybe the science isnt exact, but the main thing we cant deny is that we have impacted the earth negatively, more in the last 40 years than in the last 4000 years, which makes it more than a trend. If we continue to ignore that, we will all suffer, and so will our children.

]]> By: ed http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/#comment-21390 ed Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:57:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1718#comment-21390 Maybe the science isnt exact, but the main thing we cant deny is that we have impacted the earth negatively, more in the last 40 years than in the last 4000 years, which makes it more than a trend. If we continue to ignore that, we will all suffer, and so will our children. Maybe the science isnt exact, but the main thing we cant deny is that we have impacted the earth negatively, more in the last 40 years than in the last 4000 years, which makes it more than a trend. If we continue to ignore that, we will all suffer, and so will our children.

]]> By: obvious http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/#comment-3888 obvious Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:54:15 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1718#comment-3888 isnt this just like waterworld? next will we recycle our urine and drink it also! isnt this just like waterworld? next will we recycle our urine and drink it also!

]]> By: obvious http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/#comment-21388 obvious Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:54:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1718#comment-21388 isnt this just like waterworld? next will we recycle our urine and drink it also! isnt this just like waterworld? next will we recycle our urine and drink it also!

]]> By: obvious http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/#comment-21389 obvious Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:54:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1718#comment-21389 isnt this just like waterworld? next will we recycle our urine and drink it also! isnt this just like waterworld? next will we recycle our urine and drink it also!

]]> By: tj http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/#comment-3887 tj Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:59:45 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1718#comment-3887 This is ridiculous This is ridiculous

]]> By: tj http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/#comment-21387 tj Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:59:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1718#comment-21387 This is ridiculous This is ridiculous

]]> By: Noah http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/#comment-3886 Noah Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:54:18 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1718#comment-3886 GMNightmare- I think Karen was joking. Of course polar bears couldn't use this. Speaking of polar bears, the sea ice helps them catch their food (seals). The seals hunt under the sea ice many times, and come up at air holes in the ice that they've made. Polar bears hunt at these holes. If the ice disappears, they can't catch the seals, and at the rate sea ice is disappearing (earlier and earlier), it will be difficult for them to adapt. And I junkscience.com is run by a man who isn't in agreement with much of the scientific community. I tend to trust other publications, like "Nature", "Science" and other well-trusted ones more. Call me old fashioned. Anyway, I don't like it when people use the comment section to all of a sudden aggressively espouse whatever beef they have with the scientific community. This article is about these living arrangements in a hypothetical flooded future, not IF global warming (and its localized cooling) are real. And on that segue, I don't understand why we'd be "nomadic" in this hypothetical future. GMNightmare- I think Karen was joking. Of course polar bears couldn’t use this. Speaking of polar bears, the sea ice helps them catch their food (seals). The seals hunt under the sea ice many times, and come up at air holes in the ice that they’ve made. Polar bears hunt at these holes. If the ice disappears, they can’t catch the seals, and at the rate sea ice is disappearing (earlier and earlier), it will be difficult for them to adapt.

And I junkscience.com is run by a man who isn’t in agreement with much of the scientific community. I tend to trust other publications, like “Nature”, “Science” and other well-trusted ones more. Call me old fashioned.

Anyway, I don’t like it when people use the comment section to all of a sudden aggressively espouse whatever beef they have with the scientific community. This article is about these living arrangements in a hypothetical flooded future, not IF global warming (and its localized cooling) are real. And on that segue, I don’t understand why we’d be “nomadic” in this hypothetical future.

]]> By: Noah http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/#comment-21385 Noah Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:54:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1718#comment-21385 GMNightmare- I think Karen was joking. Of course polar bears couldn't use this. Speaking of polar bears, the sea ice helps them catch their food (seals). The seals hunt under the sea ice many times, and come up at air holes in the ice that they've made. Polar bears hunt at these holes. If the ice disappears, they can't catch the seals, and at the rate sea ice is disappearing (earlier and earlier), it will be difficult for them to adapt. And I junkscience.com is run by a man who isn't in agreement with much of the scientific community. I tend to trust other publications, like "Nature", "Science" and other well-trusted ones more. Call me old fashioned. Anyway, I don't like it when people use the comment section to all of a sudden aggressively espouse whatever beef they have with the scientific community. This article is about these living arrangements in a hypothetical flooded future, not IF global warming (and its localized cooling) are real. And on that segue, I don't understand why we'd be "nomadic" in this hypothetical future. GMNightmare- I think Karen was joking. Of course polar bears couldn’t use this. Speaking of polar bears, the sea ice helps them catch their food (seals). The seals hunt under the sea ice many times, and come up at air holes in the ice that they’ve made. Polar bears hunt at these holes. If the ice disappears, they can’t catch the seals, and at the rate sea ice is disappearing (earlier and earlier), it will be difficult for them to adapt.

And I junkscience.com is run by a man who isn’t in agreement with much of the scientific community. I tend to trust other publications, like “Nature”, “Science” and other well-trusted ones more. Call me old fashioned.

Anyway, I don’t like it when people use the comment section to all of a sudden aggressively espouse whatever beef they have with the scientific community. This article is about these living arrangements in a hypothetical flooded future, not IF global warming (and its localized cooling) are real. And on that segue, I don’t understand why we’d be “nomadic” in this hypothetical future.

]]> By: Noah http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/16/waterpod-floating-house-points-to-a-nomadic-future-after-global-warming/#comment-21386 Noah Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:54:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1718#comment-21386 GMNightmare- I think Karen was joking. Of course polar bears couldn't use this. Speaking of polar bears, the sea ice helps them catch their food (seals). The seals hunt under the sea ice many times, and come up at air holes in the ice that they've made. Polar bears hunt at these holes. If the ice disappears, they can't catch the seals, and at the rate sea ice is disappearing (earlier and earlier), it will be difficult for them to adapt. And I junkscience.com is run by a man who isn't in agreement with much of the scientific community. I tend to trust other publications, like "Nature", "Science" and other well-trusted ones more. Call me old fashioned. Anyway, I don't like it when people use the comment section to all of a sudden aggressively espouse whatever beef they have with the scientific community. This article is about these living arrangements in a hypothetical flooded future, not IF global warming (and its localized cooling) are real. And on that segue, I don't understand why we'd be "nomadic" in this hypothetical future. GMNightmare- I think Karen was joking. Of course polar bears couldn’t use this. Speaking of polar bears, the sea ice helps them catch their food (seals). The seals hunt under the sea ice many times, and come up at air holes in the ice that they’ve made. Polar bears hunt at these holes. If the ice disappears, they can’t catch the seals, and at the rate sea ice is disappearing (earlier and earlier), it will be difficult for them to adapt.

And I junkscience.com is run by a man who isn’t in agreement with much of the scientific community. I tend to trust other publications, like “Nature”, “Science” and other well-trusted ones more. Call me old fashioned.

Anyway, I don’t like it when people use the comment section to all of a sudden aggressively espouse whatever beef they have with the scientific community. This article is about these living arrangements in a hypothetical flooded future, not IF global warming (and its localized cooling) are real. And on that segue, I don’t understand why we’d be “nomadic” in this hypothetical future.

]]>