Comments on: New Chip Could Counteract Cell Phone Radiation http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/12/new-chip-could-counteract-cell-phone-radiation/ Clean Tech News & Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. & More. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Hiroe http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/12/new-chip-could-counteract-cell-phone-radiation/#comment-21330 Hiroe Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:54:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1698#comment-21330 if you removed the radiation you would not be able to get signal. Phones aren't just randomly radioactive, they use radio radiation to communicate. if you removed the radiation you would not be able to get signal. Phones aren’t just randomly radioactive, they use radio radiation to communicate.

]]> By: Hiroe http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/12/new-chip-could-counteract-cell-phone-radiation/#comment-3728 Hiroe Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:54:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1698#comment-3728 if you removed the radiation you would not be able to get signal. Phones aren't just randomly radioactive, they use radio radiation to communicate. if you removed the radiation you would not be able to get signal. Phones aren’t just randomly radioactive, they use radio radiation to communicate.

]]> By: Jan http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/12/new-chip-could-counteract-cell-phone-radiation/#comment-3727 Jan Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:12:21 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1698#comment-3727 Absolutely fraudulous. Such a chip does nothing. If you suppose complaints like headaches, vibrations in the body etc. are caused by radiation, the only possible and reasonable actions are putting the source of radiation off, use a 'cage of Faraday' or leave to a better place. Freddy Martinez, the physics do not have medical or biological expertise. They can not know if the small established small effects of the non-thermal non-ionising radiation can have negative consequences in a biological system. As a matter of fact, sometimes the effects have serious consequences indeed. Jan Absolutely fraudulous. Such a chip does nothing. If you suppose complaints like headaches, vibrations in the body etc. are caused by radiation, the only possible and reasonable actions are putting the source of radiation off, use a ‘cage of Faraday’ or leave to a better place.

Freddy Martinez, the physics do not have medical or biological expertise. They can not know if the small established small effects of the non-thermal non-ionising radiation can have negative consequences in a biological system. As a matter of fact, sometimes the effects have serious consequences indeed.

Jan

]]> By: Jan http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/12/new-chip-could-counteract-cell-phone-radiation/#comment-21329 Jan Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:12:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1698#comment-21329 Absolutely fraudulous. Such a chip does nothing. If you suppose complaints like headaches, vibrations in the body etc. are caused by radiation, the only possible and reasonable actions are putting the source of radiation off, use a 'cage of Faraday' or leave to a better place. Freddy Martinez, the physics do not have medical or biological expertise. They can not know if the small established small effects of the non-thermal non-ionising radiation can have negative consequences in a biological system. As a matter of fact, sometimes the effects have serious consequences indeed. Jan Absolutely fraudulous. Such a chip does nothing. If you suppose complaints like headaches, vibrations in the body etc. are caused by radiation, the only possible and reasonable actions are putting the source of radiation off, use a ‘cage of Faraday’ or leave to a better place.

Freddy Martinez, the physics do not have medical or biological expertise. They can not know if the small established small effects of the non-thermal non-ionising radiation can have negative consequences in a biological system. As a matter of fact, sometimes the effects have serious consequences indeed.

Jan

]]> By: Janis http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/12/new-chip-could-counteract-cell-phone-radiation/#comment-3726 Janis Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:07:54 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1698#comment-3726 New kind of snake oil? New kind of snake oil?

]]> By: Janis http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/12/new-chip-could-counteract-cell-phone-radiation/#comment-21327 Janis Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:07:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1698#comment-21327 New kind of snake oil? New kind of snake oil?

]]> By: Janis http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/12/new-chip-could-counteract-cell-phone-radiation/#comment-21328 Janis Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:07:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1698#comment-21328 New kind of snake oil? New kind of snake oil?

]]> By: FreddyMartinez http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/12/new-chip-could-counteract-cell-phone-radiation/#comment-3725 FreddyMartinez Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:47:59 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1698#comment-3725 A quick analysis on the E+M radiation produced by cell phones will show it is very very very very low energy. As in visible light is 4000 times more energetic that that radiation. The physics says you shouldn't worry. A quick analysis on the E+M radiation produced by cell phones will show it is very very very very low energy. As in visible light is 4000 times more energetic that that radiation.

The physics says you shouldn’t worry.

]]> By: FreddyMartinez http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/12/new-chip-could-counteract-cell-phone-radiation/#comment-21326 FreddyMartinez Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:47:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1698#comment-21326 A quick analysis on the E+M radiation produced by cell phones will show it is very very very very low energy. As in visible light is 4000 times more energetic that that radiation. The physics says you shouldn't worry. A quick analysis on the E+M radiation produced by cell phones will show it is very very very very low energy. As in visible light is 4000 times more energetic that that radiation.

The physics says you shouldn’t worry.

]]>