<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netherlands Train Station Features World&#039;s First Energy-Generating Revolving Door</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y-Carbon&#8217;s Tunable Nanoporous Carbon Hits High Note for Green Jobs : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-3569</link>
		<dc:creator>Y-Carbon&#8217;s Tunable Nanoporous Carbon Hits High Note for Green Jobs : CleanTechnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-3569</guid>
		<description>[...] place in sustainable technology, particularly when it comes to energy harvesting.  For example, supercapacitors partnered with revolving doors can collect energy from passers-by and convert it to electricity.  Carbon has been the material of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] place in sustainable technology, particularly when it comes to energy harvesting.  For example, supercapacitors partnered with revolving doors can collect energy from passers-by and convert it to electricity.  Carbon has been the material of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headybrew</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-3568</link>
		<dc:creator>Headybrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 08:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-3568</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s symbolic, and there is nothing wrong with that.  It&#039;s symbolic in the way President Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the roof of the whitehouse, as a symbol of commitment to change.  Unfortunately Ronald Reagan showed us what he was committed to when he became president and immediately had them removed.



I&#039;m sure the &quot;large display&quot; inside the station probably uses more power than the door generates.  But the door is a symbol of commitment to change that sends a message to people.  And that&#039;s an important message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s symbolic, and there is nothing wrong with that.  It&#8217;s symbolic in the way President Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the roof of the whitehouse, as a symbol of commitment to change.  Unfortunately Ronald Reagan showed us what he was committed to when he became president and immediately had them removed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the &#8220;large display&#8221; inside the station probably uses more power than the door generates.  But the door is a symbol of commitment to change that sends a message to people.  And that&#8217;s an important message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headybrew</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-21286</link>
		<dc:creator>Headybrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 08:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-21286</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s symbolic, and there is nothing wrong with that.  It&#039;s symbolic in the way President Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the roof of the whitehouse, as a symbol of commitment to change.  Unfortunately Ronald Reagan showed us what he was committed to when he became president and immediately had them removed.



I&#039;m sure the &quot;large display&quot; inside the station probably uses more power than the door generates.  But the door is a symbol of commitment to change that sends a message to people.  And that&#039;s an important message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s symbolic, and there is nothing wrong with that.  It&#8217;s symbolic in the way President Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the roof of the whitehouse, as a symbol of commitment to change.  Unfortunately Ronald Reagan showed us what he was committed to when he became president and immediately had them removed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the &#8220;large display&#8221; inside the station probably uses more power than the door generates.  But the door is a symbol of commitment to change that sends a message to people.  And that&#8217;s an important message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-3567</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-3567</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not idiotic and it&#039;s not a tiny amount of electricity.  4600 kwh is roughly the output of 20 solar panels.  The resources to produce the generator are incremental to the cost of producing any revolving door.  I&#039;d have to agree with Clackpot on the door producing this much energy - I believe it&#039;s an overall figure that also takes into account how much energy they save with LED lighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not idiotic and it&#8217;s not a tiny amount of electricity.  4600 kwh is roughly the output of 20 solar panels.  The resources to produce the generator are incremental to the cost of producing any revolving door.  I&#8217;d have to agree with Clackpot on the door producing this much energy &#8211; I believe it&#8217;s an overall figure that also takes into account how much energy they save with LED lighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-21285</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-21285</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not idiotic and it&#039;s not a tiny amount of electricity.  4600 kwh is roughly the output of 20 solar panels.  The resources to produce the generator are incremental to the cost of producing any revolving door.  I&#039;d have to agree with Clackpot on the door producing this much energy - I believe it&#039;s an overall figure that also takes into account how much energy they save with LED lighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not idiotic and it&#8217;s not a tiny amount of electricity.  4600 kwh is roughly the output of 20 solar panels.  The resources to produce the generator are incremental to the cost of producing any revolving door.  I&#8217;d have to agree with Clackpot on the door producing this much energy &#8211; I believe it&#8217;s an overall figure that also takes into account how much energy they save with LED lighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clackpot</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-3566</link>
		<dc:creator>Clackpot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-3566</guid>
		<description>As has been observed elsewhere, the numbers don&#039;t add up.



Neither does the kind of sloppy journalism that quotes figures such as 4600kWh without even bothering with a back-of-an-envelope verification of the figures.



4600kWh per annum works out at 12kWh per day, 365 days of the year, or a mean 500w 24/7. Which would be roughly the output of one adult pushing the door with all their available strength, all the time, for a whole year, 24 hours a day.



Unless there are other details we don&#039;t know about it just ain&#039;t credible.



Have fun.



--

Clackpot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As has been observed elsewhere, the numbers don&#8217;t add up.</p>
<p>Neither does the kind of sloppy journalism that quotes figures such as 4600kWh without even bothering with a back-of-an-envelope verification of the figures.</p>
<p>4600kWh per annum works out at 12kWh per day, 365 days of the year, or a mean 500w 24/7. Which would be roughly the output of one adult pushing the door with all their available strength, all the time, for a whole year, 24 hours a day.</p>
<p>Unless there are other details we don&#8217;t know about it just ain&#8217;t credible.</p>
<p>Have fun.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>Clackpot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clackpot</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-21284</link>
		<dc:creator>Clackpot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-21284</guid>
		<description>As has been observed elsewhere, the numbers don&#039;t add up.



Neither does the kind of sloppy journalism that quotes figures such as 4600kWh without even bothering with a back-of-an-envelope verification of the figures.



4600kWh per annum works out at 12kWh per day, 365 days of the year, or a mean 500w 24/7. Which would be roughly the output of one adult pushing the door with all their available strength, all the time, for a whole year, 24 hours a day.



Unless there are other details we don&#039;t know about it just ain&#039;t credible.



Have fun.



--

Clackpot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As has been observed elsewhere, the numbers don&#8217;t add up.</p>
<p>Neither does the kind of sloppy journalism that quotes figures such as 4600kWh without even bothering with a back-of-an-envelope verification of the figures.</p>
<p>4600kWh per annum works out at 12kWh per day, 365 days of the year, or a mean 500w 24/7. Which would be roughly the output of one adult pushing the door with all their available strength, all the time, for a whole year, 24 hours a day.</p>
<p>Unless there are other details we don&#8217;t know about it just ain&#8217;t credible.</p>
<p>Have fun.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>Clackpot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-3565</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-3565</guid>
		<description>Forget Naysayers,



I think it&#039;s a brilliant simple idea, requires next to no re-engineering, uses run-of-the-mill technology (ie cheap) and in a busy building it will be spinning almost constantly during business hours which, of course, is exactley when the lighting is required.



10 points!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget Naysayers,</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a brilliant simple idea, requires next to no re-engineering, uses run-of-the-mill technology (ie cheap) and in a busy building it will be spinning almost constantly during business hours which, of course, is exactley when the lighting is required.</p>
<p>10 points!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-21283</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-21283</guid>
		<description>Forget Naysayers,



I think it&#039;s a brilliant simple idea, requires next to no re-engineering, uses run-of-the-mill technology (ie cheap) and in a busy building it will be spinning almost constantly during business hours which, of course, is exactley when the lighting is required.



10 points!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget Naysayers,</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a brilliant simple idea, requires next to no re-engineering, uses run-of-the-mill technology (ie cheap) and in a busy building it will be spinning almost constantly during business hours which, of course, is exactley when the lighting is required.</p>
<p>10 points!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xoc</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-3564</link>
		<dc:creator>xoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-3564</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s idiotic. The tiny amount of electricity generated will never pay back the electricity invested in producing it in the first place. Its a stupid gimmick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s idiotic. The tiny amount of electricity generated will never pay back the electricity invested in producing it in the first place. Its a stupid gimmick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xoc</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/10/netherlands-train-station-features-worlds-first-energy-generating-revolving-door/#comment-21282</link>
		<dc:creator>xoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1671#comment-21282</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s idiotic. The tiny amount of electricity generated will never pay back the electricity invested in producing it in the first place. Its a stupid gimmick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s idiotic. The tiny amount of electricity generated will never pay back the electricity invested in producing it in the first place. Its a stupid gimmick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

