http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/27/zaproot-nuclear-neighborhoods/ Clean Tech News & Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. & More. Fri, 25 May 2012 22:41:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/27/zaproot-nuclear-neighborhoods/#comment-4627 Steve Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:38:13 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1581#comment-4627 Same tired arguments against nuclear. Our poor children! Spent nuclear fuel can be reprocessed resulting in much less radioactive waste. That waste can be buried underground and in time will cease to be radioactive. These new, small reactors sound like they have solved most of the problems. What exactly does rising energy consumption justify? If we learn from the past its more coal, more oil, more natural gas. Are we really going to live in fear or are we going to have some faith in human ingenuity to solve these problems? Same tired arguments against nuclear. Our poor children! Spent nuclear fuel can be reprocessed resulting in much less radioactive waste. That waste can be buried underground and in time will cease to be radioactive. These new, small reactors sound like they have solved most of the problems. What exactly does rising energy consumption justify? If we learn from the past its more coal, more oil, more natural gas. Are we really going to live in fear or are we going to have some faith in human ingenuity to solve these problems?

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/27/zaproot-nuclear-neighborhoods/#comment-21067 Steve Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:38:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1581#comment-21067 Same tired arguments against nuclear. Our poor children! Spent nuclear fuel can be reprocessed resulting in much less radioactive waste. That waste can be buried underground and in time will cease to be radioactive. These new, small reactors sound like they have solved most of the problems. What exactly does rising energy consumption justify? If we learn from the past its more coal, more oil, more natural gas. Are we really going to live in fear or are we going to have some faith in human ingenuity to solve these problems? Same tired arguments against nuclear. Our poor children! Spent nuclear fuel can be reprocessed resulting in much less radioactive waste. That waste can be buried underground and in time will cease to be radioactive. These new, small reactors sound like they have solved most of the problems. What exactly does rising energy consumption justify? If we learn from the past its more coal, more oil, more natural gas. Are we really going to live in fear or are we going to have some faith in human ingenuity to solve these problems?

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/27/zaproot-nuclear-neighborhoods/#comment-21068 Steve Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:38:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1581#comment-21068 Same tired arguments against nuclear. Our poor children! Spent nuclear fuel can be reprocessed resulting in much less radioactive waste. That waste can be buried underground and in time will cease to be radioactive. These new, small reactors sound like they have solved most of the problems. What exactly does rising energy consumption justify? If we learn from the past its more coal, more oil, more natural gas. Are we really going to live in fear or are we going to have some faith in human ingenuity to solve these problems? Same tired arguments against nuclear. Our poor children! Spent nuclear fuel can be reprocessed resulting in much less radioactive waste. That waste can be buried underground and in time will cease to be radioactive. These new, small reactors sound like they have solved most of the problems. What exactly does rising energy consumption justify? If we learn from the past its more coal, more oil, more natural gas. Are we really going to live in fear or are we going to have some faith in human ingenuity to solve these problems?

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/27/zaproot-nuclear-neighborhoods/#comment-4625 Bryan Sun, 30 Nov 2008 03:11:57 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1581#comment-4625 In the short run we curb our carbon production but in the long run we just create a new mess for our children to deal with. Rising energy consumption doesn't justify another short-sighted approach. In the short run we curb our carbon production but in the long run we just create a new mess for our children to deal with. Rising energy consumption doesn’t justify another short-sighted approach.

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/27/zaproot-nuclear-neighborhoods/#comment-21065 Bryan Sun, 30 Nov 2008 03:11:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1581#comment-21065 In the short run we curb our carbon production but in the long run we just create a new mess for our children to deal with. Rising energy consumption doesn't justify another short-sighted approach. In the short run we curb our carbon production but in the long run we just create a new mess for our children to deal with. Rising energy consumption doesn’t justify another short-sighted approach.

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/27/zaproot-nuclear-neighborhoods/#comment-21066 Bryan Sun, 30 Nov 2008 03:11:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1581#comment-21066 In the short run we curb our carbon production but in the long run we just create a new mess for our children to deal with. Rising energy consumption doesn't justify another short-sighted approach. In the short run we curb our carbon production but in the long run we just create a new mess for our children to deal with. Rising energy consumption doesn’t justify another short-sighted approach.

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/27/zaproot-nuclear-neighborhoods/#comment-4623 Steve Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:58:14 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1581#comment-4623 This is exactly what we need. Anyone who is concerned about global warming should be behind nuclear power. Solar and wind are great, but energy consumption will only continue to rise so this is the only way to burn less coal. This is exactly what we need. Anyone who is concerned about global warming should be behind nuclear power. Solar and wind are great, but energy consumption will only continue to rise so this is the only way to burn less coal.

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/27/zaproot-nuclear-neighborhoods/#comment-21063 Steve Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:58:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1581#comment-21063 This is exactly what we need. Anyone who is concerned about global warming should be behind nuclear power. Solar and wind are great, but energy consumption will only continue to rise so this is the only way to burn less coal. This is exactly what we need. Anyone who is concerned about global warming should be behind nuclear power. Solar and wind are great, but energy consumption will only continue to rise so this is the only way to burn less coal.

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/27/zaproot-nuclear-neighborhoods/#comment-21064 Steve Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:58:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1581#comment-21064 This is exactly what we need. Anyone who is concerned about global warming should be behind nuclear power. Solar and wind are great, but energy consumption will only continue to rise so this is the only way to burn less coal. This is exactly what we need. Anyone who is concerned about global warming should be behind nuclear power. Solar and wind are great, but energy consumption will only continue to rise so this is the only way to burn less coal.

]]>