<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rensselaer Researchers Nano-Engineer Solar to &#039;Near Perfect&#039; Efficiency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Russians are Coming&#8230;With a More Energy Efficient Ceramic Nanocoating : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/#comment-4162</link>
		<dc:creator>The Russians are Coming&#8230;With a More Energy Efficient Ceramic Nanocoating : CleanTechnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1510#comment-4162</guid>
		<description>[...] Ceramic nanocoatings are coming into their own as a more sustainable class of corrosion fighters with the potential for widespread application in the infrastructure (bridges, pipes, etc.), automotive, and electronics sectors.  RUSNANO anticipates that a more cost-effective process would also enable ceramic nanocoatings to replace or supplement conventional decorative coatings for metals such as aluminum, magnesium, titanium, and zirconium.  Nanotechnology is also emerging as an important element in solar power technology.  Nanocoatings have been developed that enable solar panels to stay clean with less water, and that boost solar cell efficiency. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ceramic nanocoatings are coming into their own as a more sustainable class of corrosion fighters with the potential for widespread application in the infrastructure (bridges, pipes, etc.), automotive, and electronics sectors.  RUSNANO anticipates that a more cost-effective process would also enable ceramic nanocoatings to replace or supplement conventional decorative coatings for metals such as aluminum, magnesium, titanium, and zirconium.  Nanotechnology is also emerging as an important element in solar power technology.  Nanocoatings have been developed that enable solar panels to stay clean with less water, and that boost solar cell efficiency. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/#comment-4161</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1510#comment-4161</guid>
		<description>Joseph, no. Typically university level research like this predates commercialization by a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph, no. Typically university level research like this predates commercialization by a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/#comment-20835</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1510#comment-20835</guid>
		<description>Joseph, no. Typically university level research like this predates commercialization by a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph, no. Typically university level research like this predates commercialization by a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Gubits</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/#comment-4160</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Gubits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1510#comment-4160</guid>
		<description>To Susan Kramer,

Very exiting, 97%  absorption of solar light wil produce 97% efficiency of the solar panel? Even we will receive a lower result it is still a great achievement. I would like to know if there are already solar cels on the market with the new treatment you described. Please let me know, Thank you, Joseph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Susan Kramer,</p>
<p>Very exiting, 97%  absorption of solar light wil produce 97% efficiency of the solar panel? Even we will receive a lower result it is still a great achievement. I would like to know if there are already solar cels on the market with the new treatment you described. Please let me know, Thank you, Joseph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Gubits</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/#comment-20834</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Gubits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1510#comment-20834</guid>
		<description>To Susan Kramer,

Very exiting, 97%  absorption of solar light wil produce 97% efficiency of the solar panel? Even we will receive a lower result it is still a great achievement. I would like to know if there are already solar cels on the market with the new treatment you described. Please let me know, Thank you, Joseph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Susan Kramer,</p>
<p>Very exiting, 97%  absorption of solar light wil produce 97% efficiency of the solar panel? Even we will receive a lower result it is still a great achievement. I would like to know if there are already solar cels on the market with the new treatment you described. Please let me know, Thank you, Joseph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/#comment-4159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1510#comment-4159</guid>
		<description>Is a 97% light absorption the same as 97% efficiency?  It seems like you still need to convert the captured photons to electricity (via the photoelectric effect), which will entail (pretty significant) efficiency losses.  So the end effect of this breakthrough is to boost light capture significantly, meaning there are (significantly!) more photons to convert into electrons.  But it doesn&#039;t appear that this would mean 97% efficiency, right?



Thanks for the heads up on this either way.  It&#039;s quite an advancement.  It&#039;ll all come down to cost of course, but if this is deployed widespread, it&#039;s yet another (potentially huge) step towards grid parity for solar.



Jesse Jenkins

Blogmaster

WattHead - Energy News and Commentary

http://watthead.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is a 97% light absorption the same as 97% efficiency?  It seems like you still need to convert the captured photons to electricity (via the photoelectric effect), which will entail (pretty significant) efficiency losses.  So the end effect of this breakthrough is to boost light capture significantly, meaning there are (significantly!) more photons to convert into electrons.  But it doesn&#8217;t appear that this would mean 97% efficiency, right?</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up on this either way.  It&#8217;s quite an advancement.  It&#8217;ll all come down to cost of course, but if this is deployed widespread, it&#8217;s yet another (potentially huge) step towards grid parity for solar.</p>
<p>Jesse Jenkins</p>
<p>Blogmaster</p>
<p>WattHead &#8211; Energy News and Commentary</p>
<p><a href="http://watthead.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://watthead.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/#comment-20833</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1510#comment-20833</guid>
		<description>Is a 97% light absorption the same as 97% efficiency?  It seems like you still need to convert the captured photons to electricity (via the photoelectric effect), which will entail (pretty significant) efficiency losses.  So the end effect of this breakthrough is to boost light capture significantly, meaning there are (significantly!) more photons to convert into electrons.  But it doesn&#039;t appear that this would mean 97% efficiency, right?



Thanks for the heads up on this either way.  It&#039;s quite an advancement.  It&#039;ll all come down to cost of course, but if this is deployed widespread, it&#039;s yet another (potentially huge) step towards grid parity for solar.



Jesse Jenkins

Blogmaster

WattHead - Energy News and Commentary

http://watthead.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is a 97% light absorption the same as 97% efficiency?  It seems like you still need to convert the captured photons to electricity (via the photoelectric effect), which will entail (pretty significant) efficiency losses.  So the end effect of this breakthrough is to boost light capture significantly, meaning there are (significantly!) more photons to convert into electrons.  But it doesn&#8217;t appear that this would mean 97% efficiency, right?</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up on this either way.  It&#8217;s quite an advancement.  It&#8217;ll all come down to cost of course, but if this is deployed widespread, it&#8217;s yet another (potentially huge) step towards grid parity for solar.</p>
<p>Jesse Jenkins</p>
<p>Blogmaster</p>
<p>WattHead &#8211; Energy News and Commentary</p>
<p><a href="http://watthead.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://watthead.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/#comment-4158</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1510#comment-4158</guid>
		<description>Renssalaer Polytech is so boots on the ground: that gives me hope.



Sometimes Ivy League schools can be a bit Ivory Tower: ie Harvard for 10 years did not encourage any commercial possibilities of &#039;black silicon&#039; - which frustrated those grad students who have now begun to take advantage of that idea (as SiOnyx)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renssalaer Polytech is so boots on the ground: that gives me hope.</p>
<p>Sometimes Ivy League schools can be a bit Ivory Tower: ie Harvard for 10 years did not encourage any commercial possibilities of &#8216;black silicon&#8217; &#8211; which frustrated those grad students who have now begun to take advantage of that idea (as SiOnyx)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Kraemer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/#comment-20832</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1510#comment-20832</guid>
		<description>Renssalaer Polytech is so boots on the ground: that gives me hope.



Sometimes Ivy League schools can be a bit Ivory Tower: ie Harvard for 10 years did not encourage any commercial possibilities of &#039;black silicon&#039; - which frustrated those grad students who have now begun to take advantage of that idea (as SiOnyx)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renssalaer Polytech is so boots on the ground: that gives me hope.</p>
<p>Sometimes Ivy League schools can be a bit Ivory Tower: ie Harvard for 10 years did not encourage any commercial possibilities of &#8216;black silicon&#8217; &#8211; which frustrated those grad students who have now begun to take advantage of that idea (as SiOnyx)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Patriot</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/15/rensselaer-researchers-nano-engineer-solar-to-near-perfect-efficiency/#comment-4157</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1510#comment-4157</guid>
		<description>Commercialization will be the key, and that involves the licensing of the technology.  Hopefully this will happen in rapid fashion so that the widest variety of applications can take advantage of this advance in solar energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commercialization will be the key, and that involves the licensing of the technology.  Hopefully this will happen in rapid fashion so that the widest variety of applications can take advantage of this advance in solar energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

