<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientists: Rocks Could Be Used to Capture CO2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle B</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-3591</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-3591</guid>
		<description>It has already been well established that in making Bio-Diesel from Algae, CO2 is required component to stimulate the process to the point of practical efficiency! SEE:  {http://www.itsgood4.us/biodiesel.htm

Algae can produce oil. Estimates using today&#039;s production techniques are 400 gallons per acre. The University of New Hampshire is exploring ways of forced production of algae for biodiesel that is yielding 10,000 gallons per acre and uses salty water. Their calculations show that a tiny area of the Sonoran desert in New Mexico (about 9%)  is enough area to produce all of the transportation fuel in the U.S. using their production techniques. Already, one company is experimenting with algae production stations at a power plant to capture the CO2 from the exhaust and use it to make algae for biodiesel.}  Mining anything is a very expensive deal! peridotite is a very hard rock, will required crushing, is heavy and needs transporting, is labor intensive and dangerous and needs at least open-pit mining! Great idea, but not practical, or the best solution available! Why not build Algae based CO2 absorbing bio diesel plants attached to coal burning power plants, and kill two birds with one stone, have a win-win, reduce foreign oil consumption at the same time as burning coal cleanly, produce power and oil all at once, and make cinder blocks from the ash while your at it, make a mega-employer, an industrial complex to build a town around - a new , clean safe America! DO IT! don&#039;t red tape it to death, America, move on it! Do something before you die from the (GRD) great republican depression, which is now eating you alive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has already been well established that in making Bio-Diesel from Algae, CO2 is required component to stimulate the process to the point of practical efficiency! SEE:  {http://www.itsgood4.us/biodiesel.htm</p>
<p>Algae can produce oil. Estimates using today&#8217;s production techniques are 400 gallons per acre. The University of New Hampshire is exploring ways of forced production of algae for biodiesel that is yielding 10,000 gallons per acre and uses salty water. Their calculations show that a tiny area of the Sonoran desert in New Mexico (about 9%)  is enough area to produce all of the transportation fuel in the U.S. using their production techniques. Already, one company is experimenting with algae production stations at a power plant to capture the CO2 from the exhaust and use it to make algae for biodiesel.}  Mining anything is a very expensive deal! peridotite is a very hard rock, will required crushing, is heavy and needs transporting, is labor intensive and dangerous and needs at least open-pit mining! Great idea, but not practical, or the best solution available! Why not build Algae based CO2 absorbing bio diesel plants attached to coal burning power plants, and kill two birds with one stone, have a win-win, reduce foreign oil consumption at the same time as burning coal cleanly, produce power and oil all at once, and make cinder blocks from the ash while your at it, make a mega-employer, an industrial complex to build a town around &#8211; a new , clean safe America! DO IT! don&#8217;t red tape it to death, America, move on it! Do something before you die from the (GRD) great republican depression, which is now eating you alive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle B</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-20648</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-20648</guid>
		<description>It has already been well established that in making Bio-Diesel from Algae, CO2 is required component to stimulate the process to the point of practical efficiency! SEE:  {http://www.itsgood4.us/biodiesel.htm

Algae can produce oil. Estimates using today&#039;s production techniques are 400 gallons per acre. The University of New Hampshire is exploring ways of forced production of algae for biodiesel that is yielding 10,000 gallons per acre and uses salty water. Their calculations show that a tiny area of the Sonoran desert in New Mexico (about 9%)  is enough area to produce all of the transportation fuel in the U.S. using their production techniques. Already, one company is experimenting with algae production stations at a power plant to capture the CO2 from the exhaust and use it to make algae for biodiesel.}  Mining anything is a very expensive deal! peridotite is a very hard rock, will required crushing, is heavy and needs transporting, is labor intensive and dangerous and needs at least open-pit mining! Great idea, but not practical, or the best solution available! Why not build Algae based CO2 absorbing bio diesel plants attached to coal burning power plants, and kill two birds with one stone, have a win-win, reduce foreign oil consumption at the same time as burning coal cleanly, produce power and oil all at once, and make cinder blocks from the ash while your at it, make a mega-employer, an industrial complex to build a town around - a new , clean safe America! DO IT! don&#039;t red tape it to death, America, move on it! Do something before you die from the (GRD) great republican depression, which is now eating you alive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has already been well established that in making Bio-Diesel from Algae, CO2 is required component to stimulate the process to the point of practical efficiency! SEE:  {http://www.itsgood4.us/biodiesel.htm</p>
<p>Algae can produce oil. Estimates using today&#8217;s production techniques are 400 gallons per acre. The University of New Hampshire is exploring ways of forced production of algae for biodiesel that is yielding 10,000 gallons per acre and uses salty water. Their calculations show that a tiny area of the Sonoran desert in New Mexico (about 9%)  is enough area to produce all of the transportation fuel in the U.S. using their production techniques. Already, one company is experimenting with algae production stations at a power plant to capture the CO2 from the exhaust and use it to make algae for biodiesel.}  Mining anything is a very expensive deal! peridotite is a very hard rock, will required crushing, is heavy and needs transporting, is labor intensive and dangerous and needs at least open-pit mining! Great idea, but not practical, or the best solution available! Why not build Algae based CO2 absorbing bio diesel plants attached to coal burning power plants, and kill two birds with one stone, have a win-win, reduce foreign oil consumption at the same time as burning coal cleanly, produce power and oil all at once, and make cinder blocks from the ash while your at it, make a mega-employer, an industrial complex to build a town around &#8211; a new , clean safe America! DO IT! don&#8217;t red tape it to death, America, move on it! Do something before you die from the (GRD) great republican depression, which is now eating you alive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle B</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-20649</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-20649</guid>
		<description>It has already been well established that in making Bio-Diesel from Algae, CO2 is required component to stimulate the process to the point of practical efficiency! SEE:  {http://www.itsgood4.us/biodiesel.htm

Algae can produce oil. Estimates using today&#039;s production techniques are 400 gallons per acre. The University of New Hampshire is exploring ways of forced production of algae for biodiesel that is yielding 10,000 gallons per acre and uses salty water. Their calculations show that a tiny area of the Sonoran desert in New Mexico (about 9%)  is enough area to produce all of the transportation fuel in the U.S. using their production techniques. Already, one company is experimenting with algae production stations at a power plant to capture the CO2 from the exhaust and use it to make algae for biodiesel.}  Mining anything is a very expensive deal! peridotite is a very hard rock, will required crushing, is heavy and needs transporting, is labor intensive and dangerous and needs at least open-pit mining! Great idea, but not practical, or the best solution available! Why not build Algae based CO2 absorbing bio diesel plants attached to coal burning power plants, and kill two birds with one stone, have a win-win, reduce foreign oil consumption at the same time as burning coal cleanly, produce power and oil all at once, and make cinder blocks from the ash while your at it, make a mega-employer, an industrial complex to build a town around - a new , clean safe America! DO IT! don&#039;t red tape it to death, America, move on it! Do something before you die from the (GRD) great republican depression, which is now eating you alive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has already been well established that in making Bio-Diesel from Algae, CO2 is required component to stimulate the process to the point of practical efficiency! SEE:  {http://www.itsgood4.us/biodiesel.htm</p>
<p>Algae can produce oil. Estimates using today&#8217;s production techniques are 400 gallons per acre. The University of New Hampshire is exploring ways of forced production of algae for biodiesel that is yielding 10,000 gallons per acre and uses salty water. Their calculations show that a tiny area of the Sonoran desert in New Mexico (about 9%)  is enough area to produce all of the transportation fuel in the U.S. using their production techniques. Already, one company is experimenting with algae production stations at a power plant to capture the CO2 from the exhaust and use it to make algae for biodiesel.}  Mining anything is a very expensive deal! peridotite is a very hard rock, will required crushing, is heavy and needs transporting, is labor intensive and dangerous and needs at least open-pit mining! Great idea, but not practical, or the best solution available! Why not build Algae based CO2 absorbing bio diesel plants attached to coal burning power plants, and kill two birds with one stone, have a win-win, reduce foreign oil consumption at the same time as burning coal cleanly, produce power and oil all at once, and make cinder blocks from the ash while your at it, make a mega-employer, an industrial complex to build a town around &#8211; a new , clean safe America! DO IT! don&#8217;t red tape it to death, America, move on it! Do something before you die from the (GRD) great republican depression, which is now eating you alive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: design</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-3590</link>
		<dc:creator>design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-3590</guid>
		<description>Paper, CO2, Scissors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paper, CO2, Scissors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: design</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-20646</link>
		<dc:creator>design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-20646</guid>
		<description>Paper, CO2, Scissors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paper, CO2, Scissors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: design</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-20647</link>
		<dc:creator>design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-20647</guid>
		<description>Paper, CO2, Scissors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paper, CO2, Scissors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TV Guide</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-3589</link>
		<dc:creator>TV Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-3589</guid>
		<description>Interesting...dig up carbon, burn it, release carbon dioxide and try to bury it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;dig up carbon, burn it, release carbon dioxide and try to bury it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TV Guide</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-20645</link>
		<dc:creator>TV Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-20645</guid>
		<description>Interesting...dig up carbon, burn it, release carbon dioxide and try to bury it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;dig up carbon, burn it, release carbon dioxide and try to bury it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just wondering</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-3588</link>
		<dc:creator>Just wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-3588</guid>
		<description>If the rocks absorb CO2 the will the atmosphere shink and the rocks grow.



And don&#039;t we need CO2 for oxygen.



I understand that we have a LOT of CO2. But sun is hotter than &quot;normal&quot;. So do we really have a CO2 problem, needs us to bury CO2. Wouldn&#039;t that cause a problem in the future?



Just Wondering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the rocks absorb CO2 the will the atmosphere shink and the rocks grow.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t we need CO2 for oxygen.</p>
<p>I understand that we have a LOT of CO2. But sun is hotter than &#8220;normal&#8221;. So do we really have a CO2 problem, needs us to bury CO2. Wouldn&#8217;t that cause a problem in the future?</p>
<p>Just Wondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just wondering</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-20643</link>
		<dc:creator>Just wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-20643</guid>
		<description>If the rocks absorb CO2 the will the atmosphere shink and the rocks grow.



And don&#039;t we need CO2 for oxygen.



I understand that we have a LOT of CO2. But sun is hotter than &quot;normal&quot;. So do we really have a CO2 problem, needs us to bury CO2. Wouldn&#039;t that cause a problem in the future?



Just Wondering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the rocks absorb CO2 the will the atmosphere shink and the rocks grow.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t we need CO2 for oxygen.</p>
<p>I understand that we have a LOT of CO2. But sun is hotter than &#8220;normal&#8221;. So do we really have a CO2 problem, needs us to bury CO2. Wouldn&#8217;t that cause a problem in the future?</p>
<p>Just Wondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just wondering</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-20644</link>
		<dc:creator>Just wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-20644</guid>
		<description>If the rocks absorb CO2 the will the atmosphere shink and the rocks grow.



And don&#039;t we need CO2 for oxygen.



I understand that we have a LOT of CO2. But sun is hotter than &quot;normal&quot;. So do we really have a CO2 problem, needs us to bury CO2. Wouldn&#039;t that cause a problem in the future?



Just Wondering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the rocks absorb CO2 the will the atmosphere shink and the rocks grow.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t we need CO2 for oxygen.</p>
<p>I understand that we have a LOT of CO2. But sun is hotter than &#8220;normal&#8221;. So do we really have a CO2 problem, needs us to bury CO2. Wouldn&#8217;t that cause a problem in the future?</p>
<p>Just Wondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Acai</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-3587</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Acai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-3587</guid>
		<description>Imagine being able to successfully turn any waste byproduct into carbon again. We would truly have mastered the elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine being able to successfully turn any waste byproduct into carbon again. We would truly have mastered the elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Acai</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-20642</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Acai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-20642</guid>
		<description>Imagine being able to successfully turn any waste byproduct into carbon again. We would truly have mastered the elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine being able to successfully turn any waste byproduct into carbon again. We would truly have mastered the elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ntopics</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-3586</link>
		<dc:creator>ntopics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-3586</guid>
		<description>What a great idea to reduce CO2 emissions.

I wonder how often sites like these can

be found.

thanks from tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great idea to reduce CO2 emissions.</p>
<p>I wonder how often sites like these can</p>
<p>be found.</p>
<p>thanks from tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ntopics</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/05/scientists-rocks-could-be-used-to-capture-co2/#comment-20641</link>
		<dc:creator>ntopics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1436#comment-20641</guid>
		<description>What a great idea to reduce CO2 emissions.

I wonder how often sites like these can

be found.

thanks from tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great idea to reduce CO2 emissions.</p>
<p>I wonder how often sites like these can</p>
<p>be found.</p>
<p>thanks from tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

