<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australian Scientists Create World&#039;s Most Efficient Solar Cells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ENRICO</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-104739</link>
		<dc:creator>ENRICO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-104739</guid>
		<description>the secret of solar cells efficiency is in the right combination of salt water as concentrator and from the fish scales. observe the milkfish getting sunlight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the secret of solar cells efficiency is in the right combination of salt water as concentrator and from the fish scales. observe the milkfish getting sunlight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharp Nails a Record 35.8% Solar Conversion Efficiency : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-4298</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharp Nails a Record 35.8% Solar Conversion Efficiency : CleanTechnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-4298</guid>
		<description>[...] rapid improvements.  Last year researchers at the University of South Wales in Australia announced the first silicon cell to reach 25% conversion efficiency, and this summer that SunTech announced a  solar conversion efficiency of 15.6% for its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rapid improvements.  Last year researchers at the University of South Wales in Australia announced the first silicon cell to reach 25% conversion efficiency, and this summer that SunTech announced a  solar conversion efficiency of 15.6% for its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnO</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-4296</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-4296</guid>
		<description>&quot;i think it would be awesome if you could combine solar photovoltic energy and solar heat pipe energy&quot;



There is one company experimenting with this idea.  They are running into manufacturing and assembly issues.  Currently the cost is higher then seperate PV and solar hot water.



Combining the technologies is actually a very good thing as the water cools the PV panels and raises their efficiency.   A typical PV during the prime part of the day can get as hots a 140-160 degrees.  Backed with water tubes, it cools to 100-120 and efficiency goes up by 10-15%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;i think it would be awesome if you could combine solar photovoltic energy and solar heat pipe energy&#8221;</p>
<p>There is one company experimenting with this idea.  They are running into manufacturing and assembly issues.  Currently the cost is higher then seperate PV and solar hot water.</p>
<p>Combining the technologies is actually a very good thing as the water cools the PV panels and raises their efficiency.   A typical PV during the prime part of the day can get as hots a 140-160 degrees.  Backed with water tubes, it cools to 100-120 and efficiency goes up by 10-15%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnO</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-20468</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-20468</guid>
		<description>&quot;i think it would be awesome if you could combine solar photovoltic energy and solar heat pipe energy&quot;



There is one company experimenting with this idea.  They are running into manufacturing and assembly issues.  Currently the cost is higher then seperate PV and solar hot water.



Combining the technologies is actually a very good thing as the water cools the PV panels and raises their efficiency.   A typical PV during the prime part of the day can get as hots a 140-160 degrees.  Backed with water tubes, it cools to 100-120 and efficiency goes up by 10-15%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;i think it would be awesome if you could combine solar photovoltic energy and solar heat pipe energy&#8221;</p>
<p>There is one company experimenting with this idea.  They are running into manufacturing and assembly issues.  Currently the cost is higher then seperate PV and solar hot water.</p>
<p>Combining the technologies is actually a very good thing as the water cools the PV panels and raises their efficiency.   A typical PV during the prime part of the day can get as hots a 140-160 degrees.  Backed with water tubes, it cools to 100-120 and efficiency goes up by 10-15%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ton van Geldrop</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-4294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ton van Geldrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-4294</guid>
		<description>This is nice. It is only 1% more then the Israelian Uniniversity in Tel Aviv.  Satalites solar panals aquire 50%. Well there is a price to that.

What is your price per watt. How much of the recources are used. And can you produce tera watts before 2040?

Then we talk again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nice. It is only 1% more then the Israelian Uniniversity in Tel Aviv.  Satalites solar panals aquire 50%. Well there is a price to that.</p>
<p>What is your price per watt. How much of the recources are used. And can you produce tera watts before 2040?</p>
<p>Then we talk again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ton van Geldrop</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-20467</link>
		<dc:creator>Ton van Geldrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-20467</guid>
		<description>This is nice. It is only 1% more then the Israelian Uniniversity in Tel Aviv.  Satalites solar panals aquire 50%. Well there is a price to that.

What is your price per watt. How much of the recources are used. And can you produce tera watts before 2040?

Then we talk again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nice. It is only 1% more then the Israelian Uniniversity in Tel Aviv.  Satalites solar panals aquire 50%. Well there is a price to that.</p>
<p>What is your price per watt. How much of the recources are used. And can you produce tera watts before 2040?</p>
<p>Then we talk again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bored</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-4292</link>
		<dc:creator>Bored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-4292</guid>
		<description>i think it would be awesome if you could combine solar photovoltic energy and solar heat pipe energy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it would be awesome if you could combine solar photovoltic energy and solar heat pipe energy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bored</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-20466</link>
		<dc:creator>Bored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-20466</guid>
		<description>i think it would be awesome if you could combine solar photovoltic energy and solar heat pipe energy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it would be awesome if you could combine solar photovoltic energy and solar heat pipe energy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Smith</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-4290</guid>
		<description>It is clear they are discussing silicon technology, because the other versions, not necessarily silicon, have already broken several efficiency barriers. Why is it that Australian scientists continue to work with just Gallium, Indium, and the mixes of several other conductive elements? Why not concentrate on light absorption via nitrites/ or various nitrogen components?? When nitrogen is added to the mix, it creates significantly more current, but is not well conducted to the edges,and because the compound absorbs nearly all the light spectrum? In Spring, 2008, scientists at U. Berkeley, CA USA discovered this surprising result. Their difficulty was to get the resulting crystals to lie down so it could be manufactured! So 25% is a sad joke when near 98% efficiency of light spectrum absorption is possible.

Who determined that the maximum absorption rate was 29%? When did this become your benchmark? Think out of the box. gentlemen! You have much better opportunity when you see the benefits of reducing costs per chip, than increasing the efficiency of a compound that is inferior to other combinations. You might even try to get compounding in space on the space-lab to develop improved structural advantage of your compounding so that industry could advance a few decades! You must understand that gravity has an impact on crystal formation and atomic compound structuring...I recommend you test those proposed items! Sincerely, Gregor Smith Oklahoma City, OK USA gregors@att.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is clear they are discussing silicon technology, because the other versions, not necessarily silicon, have already broken several efficiency barriers. Why is it that Australian scientists continue to work with just Gallium, Indium, and the mixes of several other conductive elements? Why not concentrate on light absorption via nitrites/ or various nitrogen components?? When nitrogen is added to the mix, it creates significantly more current, but is not well conducted to the edges,and because the compound absorbs nearly all the light spectrum? In Spring, 2008, scientists at U. Berkeley, CA USA discovered this surprising result. Their difficulty was to get the resulting crystals to lie down so it could be manufactured! So 25% is a sad joke when near 98% efficiency of light spectrum absorption is possible.</p>
<p>Who determined that the maximum absorption rate was 29%? When did this become your benchmark? Think out of the box. gentlemen! You have much better opportunity when you see the benefits of reducing costs per chip, than increasing the efficiency of a compound that is inferior to other combinations. You might even try to get compounding in space on the space-lab to develop improved structural advantage of your compounding so that industry could advance a few decades! You must understand that gravity has an impact on crystal formation and atomic compound structuring&#8230;I recommend you test those proposed items! Sincerely, Gregor Smith Oklahoma City, OK USA <a href="mailto:gregors@att.net">gregors@att.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Smith</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-20465</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-20465</guid>
		<description>It is clear they are discussing silicon technology, because the other versions, not necessarily silicon, have already broken several efficiency barriers. Why is it that Australian scientists continue to work with just Gallium, Indium, and the mixes of several other conductive elements? Why not concentrate on light absorption via nitrites/ or various nitrogen components?? When nitrogen is added to the mix, it creates significantly more current, but is not well conducted to the edges,and because the compound absorbs nearly all the light spectrum? In Spring, 2008, scientists at U. Berkeley, CA USA discovered this surprising result. Their difficulty was to get the resulting crystals to lie down so it could be manufactured! So 25% is a sad joke when near 98% efficiency of light spectrum absorption is possible.

Who determined that the maximum absorption rate was 29%? When did this become your benchmark? Think out of the box. gentlemen! You have much better opportunity when you see the benefits of reducing costs per chip, than increasing the efficiency of a compound that is inferior to other combinations. You might even try to get compounding in space on the space-lab to develop improved structural advantage of your compounding so that industry could advance a few decades! You must understand that gravity has an impact on crystal formation and atomic compound structuring...I recommend you test those proposed items! Sincerely, Gregor Smith Oklahoma City, OK USA gregors@att.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is clear they are discussing silicon technology, because the other versions, not necessarily silicon, have already broken several efficiency barriers. Why is it that Australian scientists continue to work with just Gallium, Indium, and the mixes of several other conductive elements? Why not concentrate on light absorption via nitrites/ or various nitrogen components?? When nitrogen is added to the mix, it creates significantly more current, but is not well conducted to the edges,and because the compound absorbs nearly all the light spectrum? In Spring, 2008, scientists at U. Berkeley, CA USA discovered this surprising result. Their difficulty was to get the resulting crystals to lie down so it could be manufactured! So 25% is a sad joke when near 98% efficiency of light spectrum absorption is possible.</p>
<p>Who determined that the maximum absorption rate was 29%? When did this become your benchmark? Think out of the box. gentlemen! You have much better opportunity when you see the benefits of reducing costs per chip, than increasing the efficiency of a compound that is inferior to other combinations. You might even try to get compounding in space on the space-lab to develop improved structural advantage of your compounding so that industry could advance a few decades! You must understand that gravity has an impact on crystal formation and atomic compound structuring&#8230;I recommend you test those proposed items! Sincerely, Gregor Smith Oklahoma City, OK USA <a href="mailto:gregors@att.net">gregors@att.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Austin</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-4288</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-4288</guid>
		<description>Hasn&#039;t the 40%-45% efficiency been gained by duPont?



http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=49483</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasn&#8217;t the 40%-45% efficiency been gained by duPont?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=49483" rel="nofollow">http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=49483</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Austin</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-20464</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-20464</guid>
		<description>Hasn&#039;t the 40%-45% efficiency been gained by duPont?



http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=49483</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasn&#8217;t the 40%-45% efficiency been gained by duPont?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=49483" rel="nofollow">http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=49483</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer to the World</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-4286</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer to the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-4286</guid>
		<description>I agree with Tim about discovering new aspects of sunlight.  It is pretty amazing, but when there&#039;s a will, there&#039;s a way.  There are still many things to know about our world and universe, but until we invest the mindpower, we won&#039;t know what we don&#039;t know.



It&#039;s exciting to watch these new discoveries every day though.  If you have any friends who doubt the capacity of alternative technologies to solve our energy problems, please direct them to this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Tim about discovering new aspects of sunlight.  It is pretty amazing, but when there&#8217;s a will, there&#8217;s a way.  There are still many things to know about our world and universe, but until we invest the mindpower, we won&#8217;t know what we don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s exciting to watch these new discoveries every day though.  If you have any friends who doubt the capacity of alternative technologies to solve our energy problems, please direct them to this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer to the World</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-20463</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer to the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-20463</guid>
		<description>I agree with Tim about discovering new aspects of sunlight.  It is pretty amazing, but when there&#039;s a will, there&#039;s a way.  There are still many things to know about our world and universe, but until we invest the mindpower, we won&#039;t know what we don&#039;t know.



It&#039;s exciting to watch these new discoveries every day though.  If you have any friends who doubt the capacity of alternative technologies to solve our energy problems, please direct them to this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Tim about discovering new aspects of sunlight.  It is pretty amazing, but when there&#8217;s a will, there&#8217;s a way.  There are still many things to know about our world and universe, but until we invest the mindpower, we won&#8217;t know what we don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s exciting to watch these new discoveries every day though.  If you have any friends who doubt the capacity of alternative technologies to solve our energy problems, please direct them to this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bennett</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/26/australian-scientists-create-worlds-most-efficient-solar-cells/#comment-4284</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1371#comment-4284</guid>
		<description>I find it amazing that in 2008 we can still be discovering new things about sunlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amazing that in 2008 we can still be discovering new things about sunlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

