<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Becomes World&#039;s Biggest Producer of Offshore Wind Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bored</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/#comment-4052</link>
		<dc:creator>Bored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1340#comment-4052</guid>
		<description>these are awesome. i wonder how long they will last without overhauling them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these are awesome. i wonder how long they will last without overhauling them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bored</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/#comment-20371</link>
		<dc:creator>Bored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1340#comment-20371</guid>
		<description>these are awesome. i wonder how long they will last without overhauling them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these are awesome. i wonder how long they will last without overhauling them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan P Hunter</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/#comment-4051</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan P Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1340#comment-4051</guid>
		<description>The continued development of offshore wind farms has to be applauded, in my opinion.



Making use of the seas surrounding the UK, whether with wind, wave or tidal energy is surely the way of the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The continued development of offshore wind farms has to be applauded, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Making use of the seas surrounding the UK, whether with wind, wave or tidal energy is surely the way of the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan P Hunter</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/#comment-20370</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan P Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1340#comment-20370</guid>
		<description>The continued development of offshore wind farms has to be applauded, in my opinion.



Making use of the seas surrounding the UK, whether with wind, wave or tidal energy is surely the way of the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The continued development of offshore wind farms has to be applauded, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Making use of the seas surrounding the UK, whether with wind, wave or tidal energy is surely the way of the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/#comment-4050</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1340#comment-4050</guid>
		<description>@Zune

300000 new homes per month - Nope. Where did you get that number?

In reality the US population growth would be less than a 1/3 of that.

About wind turbines in US; lots of installments in Texas and California, but very little elsewhere and hence US still have much progress to do in wind turbine installations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zune</p>
<p>300000 new homes per month &#8211; Nope. Where did you get that number?</p>
<p>In reality the US population growth would be less than a 1/3 of that.</p>
<p>About wind turbines in US; lots of installments in Texas and California, but very little elsewhere and hence US still have much progress to do in wind turbine installations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/#comment-20369</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1340#comment-20369</guid>
		<description>@Zune

300000 new homes per month - Nope. Where did you get that number?

In reality the US population growth would be less than a 1/3 of that.

About wind turbines in US; lots of installments in Texas and California, but very little elsewhere and hence US still have much progress to do in wind turbine installations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zune</p>
<p>300000 new homes per month &#8211; Nope. Where did you get that number?</p>
<p>In reality the US population growth would be less than a 1/3 of that.</p>
<p>About wind turbines in US; lots of installments in Texas and California, but very little elsewhere and hence US still have much progress to do in wind turbine installations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/#comment-4049</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1340#comment-4049</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a start in the right direction and i applaud the Brits for their green efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a start in the right direction and i applaud the Brits for their green efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/#comment-20368</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1340#comment-20368</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a start in the right direction and i applaud the Brits for their green efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a start in the right direction and i applaud the Brits for their green efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zune</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/#comment-4048</link>
		<dc:creator>zune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1340#comment-4048</guid>
		<description>I have nothing against wind power, but nuclear power is more cost effective.  In the US, 300,000 homes are built every month.  Wind cant keep up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing against wind power, but nuclear power is more cost effective.  In the US, 300,000 homes are built every month.  Wind cant keep up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zune</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/21/uk-becomes-worlds-biggest-producer-of-offshore-wind-power/#comment-20367</link>
		<dc:creator>zune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1340#comment-20367</guid>
		<description>I have nothing against wind power, but nuclear power is more cost effective.  In the US, 300,000 homes are built every month.  Wind cant keep up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing against wind power, but nuclear power is more cost effective.  In the US, 300,000 homes are built every month.  Wind cant keep up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

