<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientists Say Sewage Can Produce Cheap Hydrogen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/09/scientists-say-sewage-can-produce-cheap-hydrogen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/09/scientists-say-sewage-can-produce-cheap-hydrogen/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle B</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/09/scientists-say-sewage-can-produce-cheap-hydrogen/#comment-3631</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1272#comment-3631</guid>
		<description>The city of Oslo, Norway, already bio-gasses its sewage to methane, and runs its city buses on the gas, today! A done deal! No fancy Bull Shiite!  Is going to H2 advantageous over this, or just another cop-out American over-complication, like the &quot;wings&quot; on cars in the sixties, like the multi-million dollar space pen, while Russians simply opted for pencils and went ahead? Methane can easily be bottled and stored at relatively low pressures, and works well in conventional engines.Not so for H2! My question is:&quot;Why can&#039;t we just get of the fvcking pot and apply existing, in practice, technologies and clean our lakes and rivers, now, must we over-complicate then cop-out every damned time and get nowhere in the process? P.S. Bio-gassing leaves a fertilizer sludge for re-building top-soil, What does this H2 process leave behind? Clean water? Bio-gassable sludge? Tell us more, Please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The city of Oslo, Norway, already bio-gasses its sewage to methane, and runs its city buses on the gas, today! A done deal! No fancy Bull Shiite!  Is going to H2 advantageous over this, or just another cop-out American over-complication, like the &#8220;wings&#8221; on cars in the sixties, like the multi-million dollar space pen, while Russians simply opted for pencils and went ahead? Methane can easily be bottled and stored at relatively low pressures, and works well in conventional engines.Not so for H2! My question is:&#8221;Why can&#8217;t we just get of the fvcking pot and apply existing, in practice, technologies and clean our lakes and rivers, now, must we over-complicate then cop-out every damned time and get nowhere in the process? P.S. Bio-gassing leaves a fertilizer sludge for re-building top-soil, What does this H2 process leave behind? Clean water? Bio-gassable sludge? Tell us more, Please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle B</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/09/scientists-say-sewage-can-produce-cheap-hydrogen/#comment-20232</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1272#comment-20232</guid>
		<description>The city of Oslo, Norway, already bio-gasses its sewage to methane, and runs its city buses on the gas, today! A done deal! No fancy Bull Shiite!  Is going to H2 advantageous over this, or just another cop-out American over-complication, like the &quot;wings&quot; on cars in the sixties, like the multi-million dollar space pen, while Russians simply opted for pencils and went ahead? Methane can easily be bottled and stored at relatively low pressures, and works well in conventional engines.Not so for H2! My question is:&quot;Why can&#039;t we just get of the fvcking pot and apply existing, in practice, technologies and clean our lakes and rivers, now, must we over-complicate then cop-out every damned time and get nowhere in the process? P.S. Bio-gassing leaves a fertilizer sludge for re-building top-soil, What does this H2 process leave behind? Clean water? Bio-gassable sludge? Tell us more, Please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The city of Oslo, Norway, already bio-gasses its sewage to methane, and runs its city buses on the gas, today! A done deal! No fancy Bull Shiite!  Is going to H2 advantageous over this, or just another cop-out American over-complication, like the &#8220;wings&#8221; on cars in the sixties, like the multi-million dollar space pen, while Russians simply opted for pencils and went ahead? Methane can easily be bottled and stored at relatively low pressures, and works well in conventional engines.Not so for H2! My question is:&#8221;Why can&#8217;t we just get of the fvcking pot and apply existing, in practice, technologies and clean our lakes and rivers, now, must we over-complicate then cop-out every damned time and get nowhere in the process? P.S. Bio-gassing leaves a fertilizer sludge for re-building top-soil, What does this H2 process leave behind? Clean water? Bio-gassable sludge? Tell us more, Please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/09/scientists-say-sewage-can-produce-cheap-hydrogen/#comment-3630</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 06:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1272#comment-3630</guid>
		<description>I think this is really cool stuff. Hydrogen has made some incredible advancements lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is really cool stuff. Hydrogen has made some incredible advancements lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer to the World</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/09/scientists-say-sewage-can-produce-cheap-hydrogen/#comment-3629</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer to the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1272#comment-3629</guid>
		<description>Two great advancements in a single week?  Nanotube storage and cheap production of hydrogen.  This is absolutely amazing!



Imagine how much further we could go if the government actively supported this research with the kind of money we ship over to Iraq every month to kill people who have a dubious connection to terrorism.



We can and will overcome our energy problems whenever we decide to do so.  I&#039;m absolutely convinced of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two great advancements in a single week?  Nanotube storage and cheap production of hydrogen.  This is absolutely amazing!</p>
<p>Imagine how much further we could go if the government actively supported this research with the kind of money we ship over to Iraq every month to kill people who have a dubious connection to terrorism.</p>
<p>We can and will overcome our energy problems whenever we decide to do so.  I&#8217;m absolutely convinced of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer to the World</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/09/scientists-say-sewage-can-produce-cheap-hydrogen/#comment-20231</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer to the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1272#comment-20231</guid>
		<description>Two great advancements in a single week?  Nanotube storage and cheap production of hydrogen.  This is absolutely amazing!



Imagine how much further we could go if the government actively supported this research with the kind of money we ship over to Iraq every month to kill people who have a dubious connection to terrorism.



We can and will overcome our energy problems whenever we decide to do so.  I&#039;m absolutely convinced of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two great advancements in a single week?  Nanotube storage and cheap production of hydrogen.  This is absolutely amazing!</p>
<p>Imagine how much further we could go if the government actively supported this research with the kind of money we ship over to Iraq every month to kill people who have a dubious connection to terrorism.</p>
<p>We can and will overcome our energy problems whenever we decide to do so.  I&#8217;m absolutely convinced of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/09/scientists-say-sewage-can-produce-cheap-hydrogen/#comment-3628</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1272#comment-3628</guid>
		<description>Although interesting, I am wondering what is the nature of the discovery. Microbial fuel cells have been under research for a couple of years now and a large volume of literature already exists on the topic. Hydrogen production using a small electric supplement has been considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although interesting, I am wondering what is the nature of the discovery. Microbial fuel cells have been under research for a couple of years now and a large volume of literature already exists on the topic. Hydrogen production using a small electric supplement has been considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/09/scientists-say-sewage-can-produce-cheap-hydrogen/#comment-20230</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1272#comment-20230</guid>
		<description>Although interesting, I am wondering what is the nature of the discovery. Microbial fuel cells have been under research for a couple of years now and a large volume of literature already exists on the topic. Hydrogen production using a small electric supplement has been considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although interesting, I am wondering what is the nature of the discovery. Microbial fuel cells have been under research for a couple of years now and a large volume of literature already exists on the topic. Hydrogen production using a small electric supplement has been considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

