Comments on: Hutton Calls for Rapid Deployment of Indispensible Nuclear Plants to Keep UK Lights On http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/ Clean Tech News & Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. & More. Fri, 25 May 2012 17:05:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Edouard http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-2961 Edouard Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:08:11 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-2961 Great article ! This comes as the French national utility EDF is taking over British Energy. This will lead to the construction of at least four more nuclear power plants. Read out more on : http://www.elrst.com/2008/09/24/edf-takes-over-british-energy-for-157-billion-e/ Keep up the good work, your website is joining my blogroll ! :) Great article !

This comes as the French national utility EDF is taking over British Energy.

This will lead to the construction of at least four more nuclear power plants.

Read out more on :

http://www.elrst.com/2008/09/24/edf-takes-over-british-energy-for-157-billion-e/

Keep up the good work, your website is joining my blogroll ! :)

]]> By: Edouard http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-19691 Edouard Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:08:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-19691 Great article ! This comes as the French national utility EDF is taking over British Energy. This will lead to the construction of at least four more nuclear power plants. Read out more on : http://www.elrst.com/2008/09/24/edf-takes-over-british-energy-for-157-billion-e/ Keep up the good work, your website is joining my blogroll ! :) Great article !

This comes as the French national utility EDF is taking over British Energy.

This will lead to the construction of at least four more nuclear power plants.

Read out more on :

http://www.elrst.com/2008/09/24/edf-takes-over-british-energy-for-157-billion-e/

Keep up the good work, your website is joining my blogroll ! :)

]]> By: Edouard http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-19692 Edouard Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:08:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-19692 Great article ! This comes as the French national utility EDF is taking over British Energy. This will lead to the construction of at least four more nuclear power plants. Read out more on : http://www.elrst.com/2008/09/24/edf-takes-over-british-energy-for-157-billion-e/ Keep up the good work, your website is joining my blogroll ! :) Great article !

This comes as the French national utility EDF is taking over British Energy.

This will lead to the construction of at least four more nuclear power plants.

Read out more on :

http://www.elrst.com/2008/09/24/edf-takes-over-british-energy-for-157-billion-e/

Keep up the good work, your website is joining my blogroll ! :)

]]> By: Metyu http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-2960 Metyu Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:04:42 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-2960 Global warming and nuclear both create the same problem: apathy. The majority of people either think we're all going to die, and so who cares anyway? or they think solving the so-called AGW "problem" through changing energy supplies is some kind of panacea for mankinds problems. The reality is, we face other significant resource issues. Water problems will [continue to] kill more people in the coming 50-100 years than AGW, by an order of magnitude. Nuclear may make things worse in the short term. That does not mean we should never use it, IMO; I just think we need a reality check on the problems civilisation faces and focus the energy currently being put into arguing about fuels into solving hunger, poverty, education and health issues. Rod, perhaps you could point me in the direction of some literature that would ease my mind with respect to the negative impacts of nuclear [mining/waste/operations] on water supplies? Global warming and nuclear both create the same problem: apathy. The majority of people either think we’re all going to die, and so who cares anyway? or they think solving the so-called AGW “problem” through changing energy supplies is some kind of panacea for mankinds problems.

The reality is, we face other significant resource issues. Water problems will [continue to] kill more people in the coming 50-100 years than AGW, by an order of magnitude.

Nuclear may make things worse in the short term. That does not mean we should never use it, IMO; I just think we need a reality check on the problems civilisation faces and focus the energy currently being put into arguing about fuels into solving hunger, poverty, education and health issues.

Rod, perhaps you could point me in the direction of some literature that would ease my mind with respect to the negative impacts of nuclear [mining/waste/operations] on water supplies?

]]> By: Metyu http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-19690 Metyu Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:04:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-19690 Global warming and nuclear both create the same problem: apathy. The majority of people either think we're all going to die, and so who cares anyway? or they think solving the so-called AGW "problem" through changing energy supplies is some kind of panacea for mankinds problems. The reality is, we face other significant resource issues. Water problems will [continue to] kill more people in the coming 50-100 years than AGW, by an order of magnitude. Nuclear may make things worse in the short term. That does not mean we should never use it, IMO; I just think we need a reality check on the problems civilisation faces and focus the energy currently being put into arguing about fuels into solving hunger, poverty, education and health issues. Rod, perhaps you could point me in the direction of some literature that would ease my mind with respect to the negative impacts of nuclear [mining/waste/operations] on water supplies? Global warming and nuclear both create the same problem: apathy. The majority of people either think we’re all going to die, and so who cares anyway? or they think solving the so-called AGW “problem” through changing energy supplies is some kind of panacea for mankinds problems.

The reality is, we face other significant resource issues. Water problems will [continue to] kill more people in the coming 50-100 years than AGW, by an order of magnitude.

Nuclear may make things worse in the short term. That does not mean we should never use it, IMO; I just think we need a reality check on the problems civilisation faces and focus the energy currently being put into arguing about fuels into solving hunger, poverty, education and health issues.

Rod, perhaps you could point me in the direction of some literature that would ease my mind with respect to the negative impacts of nuclear [mining/waste/operations] on water supplies?

]]> By: Rod Adams http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-2959 Rod Adams Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:45:40 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-2959 What make you think that new nuclear power plants - with their ability to generate reliable power without contributing to global climate changing emission levels - are not green power? Can you provide a single example of a power system that works with "renewable energy" that does not have a strong dependence on coal, hydro and/or nuclear? Finally, what gives you the idea that nuclear is a Republican technology? There are a large number of supporters on both sides of the aisle in both the Senate and the House. What make you think that new nuclear power plants – with their ability to generate reliable power without contributing to global climate changing emission levels – are not green power?

Can you provide a single example of a power system that works with “renewable energy” that does not have a strong dependence on coal, hydro and/or nuclear?

Finally, what gives you the idea that nuclear is a Republican technology? There are a large number of supporters on both sides of the aisle in both the Senate and the House.

]]> By: Rod Adams http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-19689 Rod Adams Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:45:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-19689 What make you think that new nuclear power plants - with their ability to generate reliable power without contributing to global climate changing emission levels - are not green power? Can you provide a single example of a power system that works with "renewable energy" that does not have a strong dependence on coal, hydro and/or nuclear? Finally, what gives you the idea that nuclear is a Republican technology? There are a large number of supporters on both sides of the aisle in both the Senate and the House. What make you think that new nuclear power plants – with their ability to generate reliable power without contributing to global climate changing emission levels – are not green power?

Can you provide a single example of a power system that works with “renewable energy” that does not have a strong dependence on coal, hydro and/or nuclear?

Finally, what gives you the idea that nuclear is a Republican technology? There are a large number of supporters on both sides of the aisle in both the Senate and the House.

]]> By: try renewable http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-2958 try renewable Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:16:48 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-2958 I guess Britain is expected to make such a stupid decision, you being America's puppy. Follow us into a nuclear revolution. Screw renewable energy, clean tech, green tech....our future. Guess I can cross England off as a possible refuge country, if my fellow American's are stupid enough to elect Bush 111, this time with glasses and lipstick. GET A CLUE I guess Britain is expected to make such a stupid decision, you being America’s puppy. Follow us into a nuclear revolution. Screw renewable energy, clean tech, green tech….our future. Guess I can cross England off as a possible refuge country, if my fellow American’s are stupid enough to elect Bush 111, this time with glasses and lipstick. GET A CLUE

]]> By: try renewable http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-19687 try renewable Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:16:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-19687 I guess Britain is expected to make such a stupid decision, you being America's puppy. Follow us into a nuclear revolution. Screw renewable energy, clean tech, green tech....our future. Guess I can cross England off as a possible refuge country, if my fellow American's are stupid enough to elect Bush 111, this time with glasses and lipstick. GET A CLUE I guess Britain is expected to make such a stupid decision, you being America’s puppy. Follow us into a nuclear revolution. Screw renewable energy, clean tech, green tech….our future. Guess I can cross England off as a possible refuge country, if my fellow American’s are stupid enough to elect Bush 111, this time with glasses and lipstick. GET A CLUE

]]> By: try renewable http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-19688 try renewable Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:16:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-19688 I guess Britain is expected to make such a stupid decision, you being America's puppy. Follow us into a nuclear revolution. Screw renewable energy, clean tech, green tech....our future. Guess I can cross England off as a possible refuge country, if my fellow American's are stupid enough to elect Bush 111, this time with glasses and lipstick. GET A CLUE I guess Britain is expected to make such a stupid decision, you being America’s puppy. Follow us into a nuclear revolution. Screw renewable energy, clean tech, green tech….our future. Guess I can cross England off as a possible refuge country, if my fellow American’s are stupid enough to elect Bush 111, this time with glasses and lipstick. GET A CLUE

]]> By: Rich http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-2957 Rich Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:20:05 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-2957 I think nuclear power is a good idea. I don't like the idea of lining the pockets of those that are stunting the voice of the people in the Middle East, and my biggest environmental concern is CO2 output. Effectively, nuclear power is a solution in my eyes that needs to be considered. I think nuclear power is a good idea. I don’t like the idea of lining the pockets of those that are stunting the voice of the people in the Middle East, and my biggest environmental concern is CO2 output.

Effectively, nuclear power is a solution in my eyes that needs to be considered.

]]> By: Rich http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/18/hutton-calls-for-rapid-deployment-of-indispensible-nuclear-plants-to-keep-uk-lights-on/#comment-19686 Rich Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:20:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1113#comment-19686 I think nuclear power is a good idea. I don't like the idea of lining the pockets of those that are stunting the voice of the people in the Middle East, and my biggest environmental concern is CO2 output. Effectively, nuclear power is a solution in my eyes that needs to be considered. I think nuclear power is a good idea. I don’t like the idea of lining the pockets of those that are stunting the voice of the people in the Middle East, and my biggest environmental concern is CO2 output.

Effectively, nuclear power is a solution in my eyes that needs to be considered.

]]>