Hutton Calls for Rapid Deployment of Indispensible Nuclear Plants to Keep UK Lights On

Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant in SpringtimeThe United Kingdom’s energy supply situation has changed dramatically since 2003, when a UK government report titled Our Energy Future - Creating a Low Carbon Economy concluded that it was not necessary to build new nuclear power plants.

Specifically, that paper stated:

“This white paper does not contain specific proposals for building new nuclear power stations. However we do not rule out the possibility that at some point in the future new nuclear build might be necessary if we are to meet our carbon targets.”

The report authors probably did not expect that “point in the future” to arrive quite as quickly as it has. After much public consultation, a new white paper was issued in January 2008 that determined that new nuclear plant construction had to begin - quickly.

That fact has been gaining increasing traction and official attention. Today, September 18, 2008, John Hutton, the Business Secretary, will tell a group of industrialists that rapid construction of a new generation of nuclear power plants will be necessary to help keep the UK’s lights on.

According to sources that obtained an advance copy of Hutton’s scheduled speech to the UK’s new Nuclear Development Forum, here are some of the things that he plans to say:

  • UK will press “all buttons” to get nuclear built
  • nuclear is a “no-brainer” because it contributes to energy security and job creation
  • “insecure international sources underline the case for a diverse mix”
  • “determined to get nuclear up and running as soon as possible”
  • nuclear industry could create 100,000 new direct jobs
  • Britain needs to move fast to establish position in international market
  • all of the above is part of the need to “spotlight” the opportunities available

There are several factors pushing the UK government’s rapidly growing interest in building new nuclear power plants.

The nuclear industry has not yet determined that moving rapidly to build new nuclear plants is the right course of action. Part of the reluctance has to be based on history - when a large number of new nuclear plants came on line in the 1980s, the price of electricity in competitive markets dropped rapidly. Competitive power producers burning natural gas can offer their power at substantially reduced prices if the balance between supply and demand drives down the price of their major expense - buying fuel.

Photo information

The photo shows the 2200 MWe Diablo Canyon nuclear power station in the spring of 2005. Notice that there are no large, mushroom shaped cooling towers. As an island nation, the UK has plenty of places where it can build similarly situation plants that place few burdens on the visual environment.
Photo courtesy of Jim Zimmerman, all rights reserved

Related Posts

Tweet This Post

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

5 Comments

  1. I think nuclear power is a good idea. I don’t like the idea of lining the pockets of those that are stunting the voice of the people in the Middle East, and my biggest environmental concern is CO2 output.

    Effectively, nuclear power is a solution in my eyes that needs to be considered.

  2. I guess Britain is expected to make such a stupid decision, you being America’s puppy. Follow us into a nuclear revolution. Screw renewable energy, clean tech, green tech….our future. Guess I can cross England off as a possible refuge country, if my fellow American’s are stupid enough to elect Bush 111, this time with glasses and lipstick. GET A CLUE

  3. Global warming and nuclear both create the same problem: apathy. The majority of people either think we’re all going to die, and so who cares anyway? or they think solving the so-called AGW “problem” through changing energy supplies is some kind of panacea for mankinds problems.

    The reality is, we face other significant resource issues. Water problems will [continue to] kill more people in the coming 50-100 years than AGW, by an order of magnitude.

    Nuclear may make things worse in the short term. That does not mean we should never use it, IMO; I just think we need a reality check on the problems civilisation faces and focus the energy currently being put into arguing about fuels into solving hunger, poverty, education and health issues.

    Rod, perhaps you could point me in the direction of some literature that would ease my mind with respect to the negative impacts of nuclear [mining/waste/operations] on water supplies?

  4. Great article !

    This comes as the French national utility EDF is taking over British Energy.

    This will lead to the construction of at least four more nuclear power plants.

    Read out more on :
    http://www.elrst.com/2008/09/24/edf-takes-over-british-energy-for-157-billion-e/

    Keep up the good work, your website is joining my blogroll ! :)

Tell us what you think: