<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Melting Ice Caps Reduce Global Warming?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metyu</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-2298</link>
		<dc:creator>Metyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-2298</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this article, good comments too. One thing I would like others opinion on, re: &quot;the arctic doesn’t contain many surface water nutrients&quot;



I&#039;ve been thinking about trees recently: the coniferous zone is exactly that, but as snow and ice retreats, perhaps the greater area for birds to land and even nest will bring other types of seed and nutrients to the area, accelerating growth of conifers and perhaps other, broader-leafed species too? I have no idea what timescale this might work on, but life has a startling way of living wherever it can.



What will be the effect of other species eating this new source of food? Will they bring others with them, in their urine/excrement - i.e. bring the nutrients needed for more phytoplankton?



Assuming of course we don&#039;t harvest it all, as we seem to have started doing with krill.



[any response more substantive than &quot;probably not enough to counter AGW&quot; appreciated!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this article, good comments too. One thing I would like others opinion on, re: &#8220;the arctic doesn’t contain many surface water nutrients&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about trees recently: the coniferous zone is exactly that, but as snow and ice retreats, perhaps the greater area for birds to land and even nest will bring other types of seed and nutrients to the area, accelerating growth of conifers and perhaps other, broader-leafed species too? I have no idea what timescale this might work on, but life has a startling way of living wherever it can.</p>
<p>What will be the effect of other species eating this new source of food? Will they bring others with them, in their urine/excrement &#8211; i.e. bring the nutrients needed for more phytoplankton?</p>
<p>Assuming of course we don&#8217;t harvest it all, as we seem to have started doing with krill.</p>
<p>[any response more substantive than "probably not enough to counter AGW" appreciated!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metyu</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-19466</link>
		<dc:creator>Metyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-19466</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this article, good comments too. One thing I would like others opinion on, re: &quot;the arctic doesn’t contain many surface water nutrients&quot;



I&#039;ve been thinking about trees recently: the coniferous zone is exactly that, but as snow and ice retreats, perhaps the greater area for birds to land and even nest will bring other types of seed and nutrients to the area, accelerating growth of conifers and perhaps other, broader-leafed species too? I have no idea what timescale this might work on, but life has a startling way of living wherever it can.



What will be the effect of other species eating this new source of food? Will they bring others with them, in their urine/excrement - i.e. bring the nutrients needed for more phytoplankton?



Assuming of course we don&#039;t harvest it all, as we seem to have started doing with krill.



[any response more substantive than &quot;probably not enough to counter AGW&quot; appreciated!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this article, good comments too. One thing I would like others opinion on, re: &#8220;the arctic doesn’t contain many surface water nutrients&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about trees recently: the coniferous zone is exactly that, but as snow and ice retreats, perhaps the greater area for birds to land and even nest will bring other types of seed and nutrients to the area, accelerating growth of conifers and perhaps other, broader-leafed species too? I have no idea what timescale this might work on, but life has a startling way of living wherever it can.</p>
<p>What will be the effect of other species eating this new source of food? Will they bring others with them, in their urine/excrement &#8211; i.e. bring the nutrients needed for more phytoplankton?</p>
<p>Assuming of course we don&#8217;t harvest it all, as we seem to have started doing with krill.</p>
<p>[any response more substantive than "probably not enough to counter AGW" appreciated!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Harris</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-2297</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-2297</guid>
		<description>I think any reasonable scientist/human would come to a similar conclusion: that the earth will somehow compensate for the damage we are doing to it.



The question remains, though, what kind of timescale would that work on?



A new ice age would be brilliant, too. Not so good for humans.



And you know what? Let&#039;s pretend for a moment, just a tiny moment, that global warming isn&#039;t caused by humans. Some troll will certainly post that here.



 Who gives a rat&#039;s ass? Even if that were the case, I would want to live in a world that has softened its technology, designed waste out of our products, and the extremes of cancerous consumerism were checked by genuine stewardship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think any reasonable scientist/human would come to a similar conclusion: that the earth will somehow compensate for the damage we are doing to it.</p>
<p>The question remains, though, what kind of timescale would that work on?</p>
<p>A new ice age would be brilliant, too. Not so good for humans.</p>
<p>And you know what? Let&#8217;s pretend for a moment, just a tiny moment, that global warming isn&#8217;t caused by humans. Some troll will certainly post that here.</p>
<p> Who gives a rat&#8217;s ass? Even if that were the case, I would want to live in a world that has softened its technology, designed waste out of our products, and the extremes of cancerous consumerism were checked by genuine stewardship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Harris</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-19465</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-19465</guid>
		<description>I think any reasonable scientist/human would come to a similar conclusion: that the earth will somehow compensate for the damage we are doing to it.



The question remains, though, what kind of timescale would that work on?



A new ice age would be brilliant, too. Not so good for humans.



And you know what? Let&#039;s pretend for a moment, just a tiny moment, that global warming isn&#039;t caused by humans. Some troll will certainly post that here.



 Who gives a rat&#039;s ass? Even if that were the case, I would want to live in a world that has softened its technology, designed waste out of our products, and the extremes of cancerous consumerism were checked by genuine stewardship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think any reasonable scientist/human would come to a similar conclusion: that the earth will somehow compensate for the damage we are doing to it.</p>
<p>The question remains, though, what kind of timescale would that work on?</p>
<p>A new ice age would be brilliant, too. Not so good for humans.</p>
<p>And you know what? Let&#8217;s pretend for a moment, just a tiny moment, that global warming isn&#8217;t caused by humans. Some troll will certainly post that here.</p>
<p> Who gives a rat&#8217;s ass? Even if that were the case, I would want to live in a world that has softened its technology, designed waste out of our products, and the extremes of cancerous consumerism were checked by genuine stewardship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-2296</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-2296</guid>
		<description>Thanks! Let&#039;s just hope this doesn&#039;t get spun into &quot;melting ice caps are great&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Let&#8217;s just hope this doesn&#8217;t get spun into &#8220;melting ice caps are great&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer to the World</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer to the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>Great story.  I&#039;ll take a closer look at the facts, but my initial reaction is that what the scientists are seeing is the exquisite engineering inherent in our natural systems at work.  Nature has an amazing capacity to bring out-of-balance systems back to equilibrium.



But as the article points out, the increased plankton isn&#039;t likely to be capable of keeping up with the carbon.  Also, too much plankton isn&#039;t a great thing either.



The potential dangers in this situation outweigh the minimal benefit we&#039;re witnessing.  If seas get too cold from the melting ice, the gulf stream flow could be shut down.  That would be a catastrophe.  Also, the role of the ice cap is to provide a type of &quot;air conditioning&quot; for the warmer parts of the planet.  When it&#039;s gone, the lower regions will warm up significantly faster.  This affects water levels, rainfall, hurricane systems, etc.  The list is very long.



Nice job Ariel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story.  I&#8217;ll take a closer look at the facts, but my initial reaction is that what the scientists are seeing is the exquisite engineering inherent in our natural systems at work.  Nature has an amazing capacity to bring out-of-balance systems back to equilibrium.</p>
<p>But as the article points out, the increased plankton isn&#8217;t likely to be capable of keeping up with the carbon.  Also, too much plankton isn&#8217;t a great thing either.</p>
<p>The potential dangers in this situation outweigh the minimal benefit we&#8217;re witnessing.  If seas get too cold from the melting ice, the gulf stream flow could be shut down.  That would be a catastrophe.  Also, the role of the ice cap is to provide a type of &#8220;air conditioning&#8221; for the warmer parts of the planet.  When it&#8217;s gone, the lower regions will warm up significantly faster.  This affects water levels, rainfall, hurricane systems, etc.  The list is very long.</p>
<p>Nice job Ariel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer to the World</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-19464</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer to the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-19464</guid>
		<description>Great story.  I&#039;ll take a closer look at the facts, but my initial reaction is that what the scientists are seeing is the exquisite engineering inherent in our natural systems at work.  Nature has an amazing capacity to bring out-of-balance systems back to equilibrium.



But as the article points out, the increased plankton isn&#039;t likely to be capable of keeping up with the carbon.  Also, too much plankton isn&#039;t a great thing either.



The potential dangers in this situation outweigh the minimal benefit we&#039;re witnessing.  If seas get too cold from the melting ice, the gulf stream flow could be shut down.  That would be a catastrophe.  Also, the role of the ice cap is to provide a type of &quot;air conditioning&quot; for the warmer parts of the planet.  When it&#039;s gone, the lower regions will warm up significantly faster.  This affects water levels, rainfall, hurricane systems, etc.  The list is very long.



Nice job Ariel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story.  I&#8217;ll take a closer look at the facts, but my initial reaction is that what the scientists are seeing is the exquisite engineering inherent in our natural systems at work.  Nature has an amazing capacity to bring out-of-balance systems back to equilibrium.</p>
<p>But as the article points out, the increased plankton isn&#8217;t likely to be capable of keeping up with the carbon.  Also, too much plankton isn&#8217;t a great thing either.</p>
<p>The potential dangers in this situation outweigh the minimal benefit we&#8217;re witnessing.  If seas get too cold from the melting ice, the gulf stream flow could be shut down.  That would be a catastrophe.  Also, the role of the ice cap is to provide a type of &#8220;air conditioning&#8221; for the warmer parts of the planet.  When it&#8217;s gone, the lower regions will warm up significantly faster.  This affects water levels, rainfall, hurricane systems, etc.  The list is very long.</p>
<p>Nice job Ariel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenthinking</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-19463</link>
		<dc:creator>greenthinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-19463</guid>
		<description>Seems this study gonna start to debate on global warming issues. Interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems this study gonna start to debate on global warming issues. Interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenthinking</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-2294</link>
		<dc:creator>greenthinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-2294</guid>
		<description>Seems this study gonna start to debate on global warming issues. Interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems this study gonna start to debate on global warming issues. Interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Id</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Id</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-2293</guid>
		<description>Geoengineering to stop co2 is based on faulty and incomplete science.



Here are 10 things everyone should know about the hockey stick graph .



http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/ten-things-everyone-should-know-about-the-global-warming-hockey-stick/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoengineering to stop co2 is based on faulty and incomplete science.</p>
<p>Here are 10 things everyone should know about the hockey stick graph .</p>
<p><a href="http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/ten-things-everyone-should-know-about-the-global-warming-hockey-stick/" rel="nofollow">http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/ten-things-everyone-should-know-about-the-global-warming-hockey-stick/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Id</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/11/could-melting-ice-caps-reduce-global-warming/#comment-19462</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Id</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1066#comment-19462</guid>
		<description>Geoengineering to stop co2 is based on faulty and incomplete science.



Here are 10 things everyone should know about the hockey stick graph .



http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/ten-things-everyone-should-know-about-the-global-warming-hockey-stick/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoengineering to stop co2 is based on faulty and incomplete science.</p>
<p>Here are 10 things everyone should know about the hockey stick graph .</p>
<p><a href="http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/ten-things-everyone-should-know-about-the-global-warming-hockey-stick/" rel="nofollow">http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/ten-things-everyone-should-know-about-the-global-warming-hockey-stick/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

