<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World&#039;s First Carbon Capture Pilot Launching Next Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientists Examine Injecting Liquid Carbon Dioxide Underground : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientists Examine Injecting Liquid Carbon Dioxide Underground : CleanTechnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1022#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>[...] carbon capture and sequestration technology remains controversial, studies to delve deeper into it are ongoing in hopes of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] carbon capture and sequestration technology remains controversial, studies to delve deeper into it are ongoing in hopes of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1022#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>I had the opportunity to visit Schwarze Pumpe last week. The technology is promising, though at present  no carbon captured at the plant is being stored underground.



In fact, while some of it is transported off-site for use in industrial application, much of the stored carbon in the onsite tanks is simply vented back into the atmosphere. The plant can store about 20 hours of carbon, after which the tanks must be purged. At full capacity the pilot plant can store 9 tons of carbon per hour.



There is at present no framework policy in place for geologic sequestration of carbon, so it should be understood that this project is primarily testing the oxyfuel process for capturing carbon, sequestration is not part of the current operation at Schwarze Pumpe - there is hope that GS may begin in saline aquifers common in northern Germany.



The pilot plant stands next to the larger 1600 megawatt lignite-fired plant at Scwarze Pumpe, but the smaller pilot plant is not connected to the grid (and thus has no electrical output) and has a thermal output of 30MW, not 300 as stated in the post. Vattenfall hopes to have a 300-500MW demonstration plant in operation (and connected to the grid) by 2015, and a full-scale 1000MW plant running by 2020.



The steam generated from the plant is sold to a nearby paper mill.



I&#039;ve written a detailed post in the process of the oxyfuel capture process done at Schwarze Pump at: www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2009/05/15/schwarze-pumpe-part-1-first-operational-ccs-plant-captures-carbon-will-it-lead-to-clean-coal/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the opportunity to visit Schwarze Pumpe last week. The technology is promising, though at present  no carbon captured at the plant is being stored underground.</p>
<p>In fact, while some of it is transported off-site for use in industrial application, much of the stored carbon in the onsite tanks is simply vented back into the atmosphere. The plant can store about 20 hours of carbon, after which the tanks must be purged. At full capacity the pilot plant can store 9 tons of carbon per hour.</p>
<p>There is at present no framework policy in place for geologic sequestration of carbon, so it should be understood that this project is primarily testing the oxyfuel process for capturing carbon, sequestration is not part of the current operation at Schwarze Pumpe &#8211; there is hope that GS may begin in saline aquifers common in northern Germany.</p>
<p>The pilot plant stands next to the larger 1600 megawatt lignite-fired plant at Scwarze Pumpe, but the smaller pilot plant is not connected to the grid (and thus has no electrical output) and has a thermal output of 30MW, not 300 as stated in the post. Vattenfall hopes to have a 300-500MW demonstration plant in operation (and connected to the grid) by 2015, and a full-scale 1000MW plant running by 2020.</p>
<p>The steam generated from the plant is sold to a nearby paper mill.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written a detailed post in the process of the oxyfuel capture process done at Schwarze Pump at: <a href="http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2009/05/15/schwarze-pumpe-part-1-first-operational-ccs-plant-captures-carbon-will-it-lead-to-clean-coal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2009/05/15/schwarze-pumpe-part-1-first-operational-ccs-plant-captures-carbon-will-it-lead-to-clean-coal/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/#comment-19335</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1022#comment-19335</guid>
		<description>I had the opportunity to visit Schwarze Pumpe last week. The technology is promising, though at present  no carbon captured at the plant is being stored underground.



In fact, while some of it is transported off-site for use in industrial application, much of the stored carbon in the onsite tanks is simply vented back into the atmosphere. The plant can store about 20 hours of carbon, after which the tanks must be purged. At full capacity the pilot plant can store 9 tons of carbon per hour.



There is at present no framework policy in place for geologic sequestration of carbon, so it should be understood that this project is primarily testing the oxyfuel process for capturing carbon, sequestration is not part of the current operation at Schwarze Pumpe - there is hope that GS may begin in saline aquifers common in northern Germany.



The pilot plant stands next to the larger 1600 megawatt lignite-fired plant at Scwarze Pumpe, but the smaller pilot plant is not connected to the grid (and thus has no electrical output) and has a thermal output of 30MW, not 300 as stated in the post. Vattenfall hopes to have a 300-500MW demonstration plant in operation (and connected to the grid) by 2015, and a full-scale 1000MW plant running by 2020.



The steam generated from the plant is sold to a nearby paper mill.



I&#039;ve written a detailed post in the process of the oxyfuel capture process done at Schwarze Pump at: www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2009/05/15/schwarze-pumpe-part-1-first-operational-ccs-plant-captures-carbon-will-it-lead-to-clean-coal/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the opportunity to visit Schwarze Pumpe last week. The technology is promising, though at present  no carbon captured at the plant is being stored underground.</p>
<p>In fact, while some of it is transported off-site for use in industrial application, much of the stored carbon in the onsite tanks is simply vented back into the atmosphere. The plant can store about 20 hours of carbon, after which the tanks must be purged. At full capacity the pilot plant can store 9 tons of carbon per hour.</p>
<p>There is at present no framework policy in place for geologic sequestration of carbon, so it should be understood that this project is primarily testing the oxyfuel process for capturing carbon, sequestration is not part of the current operation at Schwarze Pumpe &#8211; there is hope that GS may begin in saline aquifers common in northern Germany.</p>
<p>The pilot plant stands next to the larger 1600 megawatt lignite-fired plant at Scwarze Pumpe, but the smaller pilot plant is not connected to the grid (and thus has no electrical output) and has a thermal output of 30MW, not 300 as stated in the post. Vattenfall hopes to have a 300-500MW demonstration plant in operation (and connected to the grid) by 2015, and a full-scale 1000MW plant running by 2020.</p>
<p>The steam generated from the plant is sold to a nearby paper mill.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written a detailed post in the process of the oxyfuel capture process done at Schwarze Pump at: <a href="http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2009/05/15/schwarze-pumpe-part-1-first-operational-ccs-plant-captures-carbon-will-it-lead-to-clean-coal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com/blog/2009/05/15/schwarze-pumpe-part-1-first-operational-ccs-plant-captures-carbon-will-it-lead-to-clean-coal/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Anderson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1022#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>Why does everyone want to bury the carbon dioxide and store oxygen along with the carbon and render it unavailable??



Why not break it down and release the oxygen or re-use it and burn the carbon again??



Shouldn&#039;t concentrated carbon dioxide burn and wouldn&#039;t filtering large amount of air from the atmosphere also filter out particulates like from wood burning stoves and dust and pollen and leave the air even cleaner than just trying to filter out the carbon dioxide??



Does carbon dioxide burn in high enough concentrations of carbon??



Can&#039;t the carbon be used to make roads and tires and concrete blocks and bricks and pavers??



I think filtering air on an industrial scale would be a great thing and probably would even capture enough usable carbon and oxygen to make it pay for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does everyone want to bury the carbon dioxide and store oxygen along with the carbon and render it unavailable??</p>
<p>Why not break it down and release the oxygen or re-use it and burn the carbon again??</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t concentrated carbon dioxide burn and wouldn&#8217;t filtering large amount of air from the atmosphere also filter out particulates like from wood burning stoves and dust and pollen and leave the air even cleaner than just trying to filter out the carbon dioxide??</p>
<p>Does carbon dioxide burn in high enough concentrations of carbon??</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t the carbon be used to make roads and tires and concrete blocks and bricks and pavers??</p>
<p>I think filtering air on an industrial scale would be a great thing and probably would even capture enough usable carbon and oxygen to make it pay for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/#comment-1938</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1022#comment-1938</guid>
		<description>This is interesting to me, especially since one of its outputs is an input as well. The CO2 pumped out can be pumped back in with a measured amount of O2 to control the speed of the burning as well to optimize the amount of coal burned. The biggest problem may be finding a way cheap enough to source and transport the 02 into the system. Electrolysis isn&#039;t really a solution, considering the energy required to split water would counteract the energy produced by the power plant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting to me, especially since one of its outputs is an input as well. The CO2 pumped out can be pumped back in with a measured amount of O2 to control the speed of the burning as well to optimize the amount of coal burned. The biggest problem may be finding a way cheap enough to source and transport the 02 into the system. Electrolysis isn&#8217;t really a solution, considering the energy required to split water would counteract the energy produced by the power plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/#comment-19334</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1022#comment-19334</guid>
		<description>This is interesting to me, especially since one of its outputs is an input as well. The CO2 pumped out can be pumped back in with a measured amount of O2 to control the speed of the burning as well to optimize the amount of coal burned. The biggest problem may be finding a way cheap enough to source and transport the 02 into the system. Electrolysis isn&#039;t really a solution, considering the energy required to split water would counteract the energy produced by the power plant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting to me, especially since one of its outputs is an input as well. The CO2 pumped out can be pumped back in with a measured amount of O2 to control the speed of the burning as well to optimize the amount of coal burned. The biggest problem may be finding a way cheap enough to source and transport the 02 into the system. Electrolysis isn&#8217;t really a solution, considering the energy required to split water would counteract the energy produced by the power plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web design company</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/#comment-1937</link>
		<dc:creator>web design company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1022#comment-1937</guid>
		<description>Lets hope it works well. It is needed in developing countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets hope it works well. It is needed in developing countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web design company</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/#comment-19333</link>
		<dc:creator>web design company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1022#comment-19333</guid>
		<description>Lets hope it works well. It is needed in developing countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets hope it works well. It is needed in developing countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1022#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>Ray - Derek McLeish of Carbon Sciences told me that an earthquake can release buried CO2 in a matter of seconds. Of course, we haven&#039;t had the opportunity to see the full effect of this since CCS isn&#039;t operating on a commercial scale, but it seems like bad news to use it in seismically active areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray &#8211; Derek McLeish of Carbon Sciences told me that an earthquake can release buried CO2 in a matter of seconds. Of course, we haven&#8217;t had the opportunity to see the full effect of this since CCS isn&#8217;t operating on a commercial scale, but it seems like bad news to use it in seismically active areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray The Money Man</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/05/worlds-first-carbon-capture-pilot-launching-next-week/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray The Money Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1022#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>The earthquake question was the first thing that came to my mind. How dangerous is it really though?









http://thealternativeenergyinvestor.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The earthquake question was the first thing that came to my mind. How dangerous is it really though?</p>
<p><a href="http://thealternativeenergyinvestor.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://thealternativeenergyinvestor.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

