<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Wind Energy Generation Tops 20 Gigawatts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/us-wind-energy-generation-tops-20-gigawatts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/us-wind-energy-generation-tops-20-gigawatts/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/us-wind-energy-generation-tops-20-gigawatts/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/us-wind-energy-generation-tops-20-gigawatts/#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>You really need a better picture there.

That picture is of the ancient long gone US Windpower wind turbines in Livermore, CA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really need a better picture there.</p>
<p>That picture is of the ancient long gone US Windpower wind turbines in Livermore, CA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/us-wind-energy-generation-tops-20-gigawatts/#comment-19296</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/us-wind-energy-generation-tops-20-gigawatts/#comment-19296</guid>
		<description>You really need a better picture there.

That picture is of the ancient long gone US Windpower wind turbines in Livermore, CA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really need a better picture there.</p>
<p>That picture is of the ancient long gone US Windpower wind turbines in Livermore, CA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils Davis</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/us-wind-energy-generation-tops-20-gigawatts/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/us-wind-energy-generation-tops-20-gigawatts/#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t had a chance to read the report yet, but I&#039;m wondering what they say is the *rate of growth* of wind energy generating capacity. If it&#039;s a linear growth (i.e., 16GW per year as mentioned) then it will take a lot longer than if the growth is accelerating. If it&#039;s 16GW next year, then 24GW in 2010, and 32GW in 2011, we&#039;ll hit the target a lot sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t had a chance to read the report yet, but I&#8217;m wondering what they say is the *rate of growth* of wind energy generating capacity. If it&#8217;s a linear growth (i.e., 16GW per year as mentioned) then it will take a lot longer than if the growth is accelerating. If it&#8217;s 16GW next year, then 24GW in 2010, and 32GW in 2011, we&#8217;ll hit the target a lot sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils Davis</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/us-wind-energy-generation-tops-20-gigawatts/#comment-19295</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/us-wind-energy-generation-tops-20-gigawatts/#comment-19295</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t had a chance to read the report yet, but I&#039;m wondering what they say is the *rate of growth* of wind energy generating capacity. If it&#039;s a linear growth (i.e., 16GW per year as mentioned) then it will take a lot longer than if the growth is accelerating. If it&#039;s 16GW next year, then 24GW in 2010, and 32GW in 2011, we&#039;ll hit the target a lot sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t had a chance to read the report yet, but I&#8217;m wondering what they say is the *rate of growth* of wind energy generating capacity. If it&#8217;s a linear growth (i.e., 16GW per year as mentioned) then it will take a lot longer than if the growth is accelerating. If it&#8217;s 16GW next year, then 24GW in 2010, and 32GW in 2011, we&#8217;ll hit the target a lot sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

