Comments on: Exelon Progressing Toward 3,000 MW of Emission-Free Nuclear Power in Texas http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/exelon-progressing-toward-3000-mw-of-emission-free-nuclear-power-in-texas/ Clean Tech News & Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. & More. Fri, 25 May 2012 17:05:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Anonymous http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/exelon-progressing-toward-3000-mw-of-emission-free-nuclear-power-in-texas/#comment-1742 Anonymous Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:48:24 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1004#comment-1742 [...] [...]

]]> By: Josh http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/exelon-progressing-toward-3000-mw-of-emission-free-nuclear-power-in-texas/#comment-1741 Josh Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:54:59 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1004#comment-1741 I think pebble bed reactors are much safer. It's disappointing to see they aren't going that direction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_bed_reactor I think pebble bed reactors are much safer. It’s disappointing to see they aren’t going that direction.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_bed_reactor

]]> By: Josh http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/exelon-progressing-toward-3000-mw-of-emission-free-nuclear-power-in-texas/#comment-19293 Josh Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:54:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1004#comment-19293 I think pebble bed reactors are much safer. It's disappointing to see they aren't going that direction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_bed_reactor I think pebble bed reactors are much safer. It’s disappointing to see they aren’t going that direction.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_bed_reactor

]]> By: Rod Adams http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/exelon-progressing-toward-3000-mw-of-emission-free-nuclear-power-in-texas/#comment-1740 Rod Adams Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:30:56 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1004#comment-1740 Just Watching - 100 x 3,000 MW would provide more than half of the US electrical power needs. At your proposed building rate, all we would need would be 2 weeks. Just Watching – 100 x 3,000 MW would provide more than half of the US electrical power needs. At your proposed building rate, all we would need would be 2 weeks.

]]> By: Rod Adams http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/exelon-progressing-toward-3000-mw-of-emission-free-nuclear-power-in-texas/#comment-19292 Rod Adams Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:30:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1004#comment-19292 Just Watching - 100 x 3,000 MW would provide more than half of the US electrical power needs. At your proposed building rate, all we would need would be 2 weeks. Just Watching – 100 x 3,000 MW would provide more than half of the US electrical power needs. At your proposed building rate, all we would need would be 2 weeks.

]]> By: Just Watching http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/exelon-progressing-toward-3000-mw-of-emission-free-nuclear-power-in-texas/#comment-1739 Just Watching Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:08:18 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1004#comment-1739 It would be nice if 100 of these could come online every week for the rest of the year. It would be nice if 100 of these could come online every week for the rest of the year.

]]> By: Just Watching http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/exelon-progressing-toward-3000-mw-of-emission-free-nuclear-power-in-texas/#comment-19291 Just Watching Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:08:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=1004#comment-19291 It would be nice if 100 of these could come online every week for the rest of the year. It would be nice if 100 of these could come online every week for the rest of the year.

]]>