<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Want to Find Irradiated Salad Greens in My Local Grocery Store</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/28/i-want-to-find-irradiated-salad-greens-in-my-local-grocery-store/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/28/i-want-to-find-irradiated-salad-greens-in-my-local-grocery-store/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/28/i-want-to-find-irradiated-salad-greens-in-my-local-grocery-store/#comment-2914</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=963#comment-2914</guid>
		<description>Good to see a rational perspective on this topic.  As a long time health food supporter and reader, theres a few FUDish myths that bother me.  One is the mistaken impression that irradiated produce is radioactive.



The second is that GMOs are inherently bad.  While I believe caution needs to be taken, the modifications typically made to plants and microbes (for example putting extra protein genes in rice) seem unlikely to bear any potential to cause harm by any great stretch of the imagination.  This kind of unrational fear of GMOs even is preventing vegetarian rennet from advancing, as vegetarian rennets, such as GRAS come from microbes with slight genetic modifications.  In this case one gene is added to produce a lactose digesting enzyme, yet the method has been derided for being a GMO.  Such blanket criticisms are ridiculous.



With these kind of fake issues out of the way, we can hopefully tackle real problems, like the harmful effects of pesticides and herbicides on the human body.



-Jason @ DailyTech LLC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see a rational perspective on this topic.  As a long time health food supporter and reader, theres a few FUDish myths that bother me.  One is the mistaken impression that irradiated produce is radioactive.</p>
<p>The second is that GMOs are inherently bad.  While I believe caution needs to be taken, the modifications typically made to plants and microbes (for example putting extra protein genes in rice) seem unlikely to bear any potential to cause harm by any great stretch of the imagination.  This kind of unrational fear of GMOs even is preventing vegetarian rennet from advancing, as vegetarian rennets, such as GRAS come from microbes with slight genetic modifications.  In this case one gene is added to produce a lactose digesting enzyme, yet the method has been derided for being a GMO.  Such blanket criticisms are ridiculous.</p>
<p>With these kind of fake issues out of the way, we can hopefully tackle real problems, like the harmful effects of pesticides and herbicides on the human body.</p>
<p>-Jason @ DailyTech LLC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/28/i-want-to-find-irradiated-salad-greens-in-my-local-grocery-store/#comment-19180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=963#comment-19180</guid>
		<description>Good to see a rational perspective on this topic.  As a long time health food supporter and reader, theres a few FUDish myths that bother me.  One is the mistaken impression that irradiated produce is radioactive.



The second is that GMOs are inherently bad.  While I believe caution needs to be taken, the modifications typically made to plants and microbes (for example putting extra protein genes in rice) seem unlikely to bear any potential to cause harm by any great stretch of the imagination.  This kind of unrational fear of GMOs even is preventing vegetarian rennet from advancing, as vegetarian rennets, such as GRAS come from microbes with slight genetic modifications.  In this case one gene is added to produce a lactose digesting enzyme, yet the method has been derided for being a GMO.  Such blanket criticisms are ridiculous.



With these kind of fake issues out of the way, we can hopefully tackle real problems, like the harmful effects of pesticides and herbicides on the human body.



-Jason @ DailyTech LLC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see a rational perspective on this topic.  As a long time health food supporter and reader, theres a few FUDish myths that bother me.  One is the mistaken impression that irradiated produce is radioactive.</p>
<p>The second is that GMOs are inherently bad.  While I believe caution needs to be taken, the modifications typically made to plants and microbes (for example putting extra protein genes in rice) seem unlikely to bear any potential to cause harm by any great stretch of the imagination.  This kind of unrational fear of GMOs even is preventing vegetarian rennet from advancing, as vegetarian rennets, such as GRAS come from microbes with slight genetic modifications.  In this case one gene is added to produce a lactose digesting enzyme, yet the method has been derided for being a GMO.  Such blanket criticisms are ridiculous.</p>
<p>With these kind of fake issues out of the way, we can hopefully tackle real problems, like the harmful effects of pesticides and herbicides on the human body.</p>
<p>-Jason @ DailyTech LLC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/28/i-want-to-find-irradiated-salad-greens-in-my-local-grocery-store/#comment-2913</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=963#comment-2913</guid>
		<description>Why not get to the real problem of the crap on the surface of the produce and then get it clean?  Here is link to an interesting research study: (you have to wonder why the foodservice operators and proccessing plant have not switched to this type of item)







http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/06/26/Produce_wash_kills_bacteria_on_food/UPI-42751214505272/







Produce wash kills bacteria on food



Published: June 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM







·



PULLMAN, Wash., June 26 (UPI) -- A fruit and vegetable wash, when used in food-manufacturing, can decrease food pathogens in produce-processing wash water, U.S. researchers said.



Researchers at the University of Idaho and Washington State University said the product sold commercially as FIT Fruit and Vegetable Wash, not only proved much more effective than the commonly used chlorine dioxide, but is made from ingredients like citric acid and distilled grapefruit oil that are generally regarded as safe.



Chlorine dioxide, used in food plants, can put workers at risk, when compromised by soils and plant debris in the wash water. In the study, chlorine dioxide killed 90 percent of the target organisms in the food plant and follow-up laboratory studies. By contrast, FIT killed 99.999 percent, said food scientist Dong-Hyun Kang of Washington State University.



&quot;If you had a million bacteria, you would have one left,&quot; Kang said.



The research -- unusual because part of it was conducted under real-world conditions in an Idaho fresh pack potato operation -- is published online ahead of print in the Journal of Food Science in August.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not get to the real problem of the crap on the surface of the produce and then get it clean?  Here is link to an interesting research study: (you have to wonder why the foodservice operators and proccessing plant have not switched to this type of item)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/06/26/Produce_wash_kills_bacteria_on_food/UPI-42751214505272/" rel="nofollow">http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/06/26/Produce_wash_kills_bacteria_on_food/UPI-42751214505272/</a></p>
<p>Produce wash kills bacteria on food</p>
<p>Published: June 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM</p>
<p>·</p>
<p>PULLMAN, Wash., June 26 (UPI) &#8212; A fruit and vegetable wash, when used in food-manufacturing, can decrease food pathogens in produce-processing wash water, U.S. researchers said.</p>
<p>Researchers at the University of Idaho and Washington State University said the product sold commercially as FIT Fruit and Vegetable Wash, not only proved much more effective than the commonly used chlorine dioxide, but is made from ingredients like citric acid and distilled grapefruit oil that are generally regarded as safe.</p>
<p>Chlorine dioxide, used in food plants, can put workers at risk, when compromised by soils and plant debris in the wash water. In the study, chlorine dioxide killed 90 percent of the target organisms in the food plant and follow-up laboratory studies. By contrast, FIT killed 99.999 percent, said food scientist Dong-Hyun Kang of Washington State University.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you had a million bacteria, you would have one left,&#8221; Kang said.</p>
<p>The research &#8212; unusual because part of it was conducted under real-world conditions in an Idaho fresh pack potato operation &#8212; is published online ahead of print in the Journal of Food Science in August.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/28/i-want-to-find-irradiated-salad-greens-in-my-local-grocery-store/#comment-19179</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=963#comment-19179</guid>
		<description>Why not get to the real problem of the crap on the surface of the produce and then get it clean?  Here is link to an interesting research study: (you have to wonder why the foodservice operators and proccessing plant have not switched to this type of item)







http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/06/26/Produce_wash_kills_bacteria_on_food/UPI-42751214505272/







Produce wash kills bacteria on food



Published: June 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM







·



PULLMAN, Wash., June 26 (UPI) -- A fruit and vegetable wash, when used in food-manufacturing, can decrease food pathogens in produce-processing wash water, U.S. researchers said.



Researchers at the University of Idaho and Washington State University said the product sold commercially as FIT Fruit and Vegetable Wash, not only proved much more effective than the commonly used chlorine dioxide, but is made from ingredients like citric acid and distilled grapefruit oil that are generally regarded as safe.



Chlorine dioxide, used in food plants, can put workers at risk, when compromised by soils and plant debris in the wash water. In the study, chlorine dioxide killed 90 percent of the target organisms in the food plant and follow-up laboratory studies. By contrast, FIT killed 99.999 percent, said food scientist Dong-Hyun Kang of Washington State University.



&quot;If you had a million bacteria, you would have one left,&quot; Kang said.



The research -- unusual because part of it was conducted under real-world conditions in an Idaho fresh pack potato operation -- is published online ahead of print in the Journal of Food Science in August.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not get to the real problem of the crap on the surface of the produce and then get it clean?  Here is link to an interesting research study: (you have to wonder why the foodservice operators and proccessing plant have not switched to this type of item)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/06/26/Produce_wash_kills_bacteria_on_food/UPI-42751214505272/" rel="nofollow">http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2008/06/26/Produce_wash_kills_bacteria_on_food/UPI-42751214505272/</a></p>
<p>Produce wash kills bacteria on food</p>
<p>Published: June 26, 2008 at 2:34 PM</p>
<p>·</p>
<p>PULLMAN, Wash., June 26 (UPI) &#8212; A fruit and vegetable wash, when used in food-manufacturing, can decrease food pathogens in produce-processing wash water, U.S. researchers said.</p>
<p>Researchers at the University of Idaho and Washington State University said the product sold commercially as FIT Fruit and Vegetable Wash, not only proved much more effective than the commonly used chlorine dioxide, but is made from ingredients like citric acid and distilled grapefruit oil that are generally regarded as safe.</p>
<p>Chlorine dioxide, used in food plants, can put workers at risk, when compromised by soils and plant debris in the wash water. In the study, chlorine dioxide killed 90 percent of the target organisms in the food plant and follow-up laboratory studies. By contrast, FIT killed 99.999 percent, said food scientist Dong-Hyun Kang of Washington State University.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you had a million bacteria, you would have one left,&#8221; Kang said.</p>
<p>The research &#8212; unusual because part of it was conducted under real-world conditions in an Idaho fresh pack potato operation &#8212; is published online ahead of print in the Journal of Food Science in August.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

