<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind Turbines and&#8230; Health?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/#comment-69205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 02:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=876#comment-69205</guid>
		<description>When we look at the future energy availability, renewables will play a huge part.  Energy consumption is projected to double by 2050.  All non renewable and most renewable sources will not be able to meet this energy demand except for solar.  Wind may be able to generate 2 GW out of the 15 GW of new energy required by 2050.  Nuclear will be less.  Solar thermal is able to economically store energy and requires a much smaller landmass than wind for the same energy output.  This is also no noise issues with solar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we look at the future energy availability, renewables will play a huge part.  Energy consumption is projected to double by 2050.  All non renewable and most renewable sources will not be able to meet this energy demand except for solar.  Wind may be able to generate 2 GW out of the 15 GW of new energy required by 2050.  Nuclear will be less.  Solar thermal is able to economically store energy and requires a much smaller landmass than wind for the same energy output.  This is also no noise issues with solar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Anderson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>M Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=876#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>In Ontario, a coalition of 33 citizen groups are undertaking a survey and doing the work that Health Canada should be doing itself.



Out of the 126 returned surveys from people living close to wind turbines in Ontario, 86 people have reported symptoms since the turbines went up near them.   Granted, some of these might be happening whether they lived near turbines or not but this is really a shockingly high number.   None of these people opposed the turbines when they went up, they welcomed them into their communities.



See more details here:   http://windconcernsontario.org



Please read the comments made by people taking this survey...it is really quite sad.   If it was your child suffering, would you still be &quot;damn the NIMBYs&quot; at all costs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Ontario, a coalition of 33 citizen groups are undertaking a survey and doing the work that Health Canada should be doing itself.</p>
<p>Out of the 126 returned surveys from people living close to wind turbines in Ontario, 86 people have reported symptoms since the turbines went up near them.   Granted, some of these might be happening whether they lived near turbines or not but this is really a shockingly high number.   None of these people opposed the turbines when they went up, they welcomed them into their communities.</p>
<p>See more details here:   <a href="http://windconcernsontario.org" rel="nofollow">http://windconcernsontario.org</a></p>
<p>Please read the comments made by people taking this survey&#8230;it is really quite sad.   If it was your child suffering, would you still be &#8220;damn the NIMBYs&#8221; at all costs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Anderson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/#comment-18911</link>
		<dc:creator>M Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=876#comment-18911</guid>
		<description>In Ontario, a coalition of 33 citizen groups are undertaking a survey and doing the work that Health Canada should be doing itself.



Out of the 126 returned surveys from people living close to wind turbines in Ontario, 86 people have reported symptoms since the turbines went up near them.   Granted, some of these might be happening whether they lived near turbines or not but this is really a shockingly high number.   None of these people opposed the turbines when they went up, they welcomed them into their communities.



See more details here:   http://windconcernsontario.org



Please read the comments made by people taking this survey...it is really quite sad.   If it was your child suffering, would you still be &quot;damn the NIMBYs&quot; at all costs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Ontario, a coalition of 33 citizen groups are undertaking a survey and doing the work that Health Canada should be doing itself.</p>
<p>Out of the 126 returned surveys from people living close to wind turbines in Ontario, 86 people have reported symptoms since the turbines went up near them.   Granted, some of these might be happening whether they lived near turbines or not but this is really a shockingly high number.   None of these people opposed the turbines when they went up, they welcomed them into their communities.</p>
<p>See more details here:   <a href="http://windconcernsontario.org" rel="nofollow">http://windconcernsontario.org</a></p>
<p>Please read the comments made by people taking this survey&#8230;it is really quite sad.   If it was your child suffering, would you still be &#8220;damn the NIMBYs&#8221; at all costs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minor</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator>Minor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=876#comment-2100</guid>
		<description>I sympathize with the folks who have ended up surrounded by dozens of turbines. Low frequency sound is very difficult to shield or mask.



That said, I offer this hard geological fact: Someday this country will run entirely on renewable energy. That&#039;s not wishful thinking, it has to do with the fact that the earth isn&#039;t producing fossil fuels anymore.



The other hard fact is that when (not if) we reach that point we will have to live with a lot less energy than we do now. We will have to collect it from more diffuse sources in smaller quantities and use it in less convenient ways. We will want every source we can possibly get, including large scale wind.



The question we face is not &quot;Wind power: yes or no?&quot;, but &quot;Wind power: How and where?&quot;



There need to be setback standards, noise standards, and environmental impact standards for wind turbines. Nevertheless, there will always be negative effects, just as there are for highways and cars, airports, fossil and nuclear plants, sewage treatment plants, cities, suburbs, and you name it.



Any calls to &quot;stop the madness&quot; of wind turbines ignore the temporary nature of the fossil fuel age. They should be matched with calls to &quot;stop the madness&quot; of all the much greater health risks in our technologically enhanced lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sympathize with the folks who have ended up surrounded by dozens of turbines. Low frequency sound is very difficult to shield or mask.</p>
<p>That said, I offer this hard geological fact: Someday this country will run entirely on renewable energy. That&#8217;s not wishful thinking, it has to do with the fact that the earth isn&#8217;t producing fossil fuels anymore.</p>
<p>The other hard fact is that when (not if) we reach that point we will have to live with a lot less energy than we do now. We will have to collect it from more diffuse sources in smaller quantities and use it in less convenient ways. We will want every source we can possibly get, including large scale wind.</p>
<p>The question we face is not &#8220;Wind power: yes or no?&#8221;, but &#8220;Wind power: How and where?&#8221;</p>
<p>There need to be setback standards, noise standards, and environmental impact standards for wind turbines. Nevertheless, there will always be negative effects, just as there are for highways and cars, airports, fossil and nuclear plants, sewage treatment plants, cities, suburbs, and you name it.</p>
<p>Any calls to &#8220;stop the madness&#8221; of wind turbines ignore the temporary nature of the fossil fuel age. They should be matched with calls to &#8220;stop the madness&#8221; of all the much greater health risks in our technologically enhanced lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minor</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/#comment-18910</link>
		<dc:creator>Minor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=876#comment-18910</guid>
		<description>I sympathize with the folks who have ended up surrounded by dozens of turbines. Low frequency sound is very difficult to shield or mask.



That said, I offer this hard geological fact: Someday this country will run entirely on renewable energy. That&#039;s not wishful thinking, it has to do with the fact that the earth isn&#039;t producing fossil fuels anymore.



The other hard fact is that when (not if) we reach that point we will have to live with a lot less energy than we do now. We will have to collect it from more diffuse sources in smaller quantities and use it in less convenient ways. We will want every source we can possibly get, including large scale wind.



The question we face is not &quot;Wind power: yes or no?&quot;, but &quot;Wind power: How and where?&quot;



There need to be setback standards, noise standards, and environmental impact standards for wind turbines. Nevertheless, there will always be negative effects, just as there are for highways and cars, airports, fossil and nuclear plants, sewage treatment plants, cities, suburbs, and you name it.



Any calls to &quot;stop the madness&quot; of wind turbines ignore the temporary nature of the fossil fuel age. They should be matched with calls to &quot;stop the madness&quot; of all the much greater health risks in our technologically enhanced lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sympathize with the folks who have ended up surrounded by dozens of turbines. Low frequency sound is very difficult to shield or mask.</p>
<p>That said, I offer this hard geological fact: Someday this country will run entirely on renewable energy. That&#8217;s not wishful thinking, it has to do with the fact that the earth isn&#8217;t producing fossil fuels anymore.</p>
<p>The other hard fact is that when (not if) we reach that point we will have to live with a lot less energy than we do now. We will have to collect it from more diffuse sources in smaller quantities and use it in less convenient ways. We will want every source we can possibly get, including large scale wind.</p>
<p>The question we face is not &#8220;Wind power: yes or no?&#8221;, but &#8220;Wind power: How and where?&#8221;</p>
<p>There need to be setback standards, noise standards, and environmental impact standards for wind turbines. Nevertheless, there will always be negative effects, just as there are for highways and cars, airports, fossil and nuclear plants, sewage treatment plants, cities, suburbs, and you name it.</p>
<p>Any calls to &#8220;stop the madness&#8221; of wind turbines ignore the temporary nature of the fossil fuel age. They should be matched with calls to &#8220;stop the madness&#8221; of all the much greater health risks in our technologically enhanced lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albert best</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator>albert best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=876#comment-2099</guid>
		<description>A 20  KW wind turbine was built about 1/4 mile from my home. There is a loud humming sound that is loudest at night. Some of my neighbors plan to move. It keeps us up at night. We are petitioning to have it taken down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 20  KW wind turbine was built about 1/4 mile from my home. There is a loud humming sound that is loudest at night. Some of my neighbors plan to move. It keeps us up at night. We are petitioning to have it taken down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albert best</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/#comment-18909</link>
		<dc:creator>albert best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=876#comment-18909</guid>
		<description>A 20  KW wind turbine was built about 1/4 mile from my home. There is a loud humming sound that is loudest at night. Some of my neighbors plan to move. It keeps us up at night. We are petitioning to have it taken down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 20  KW wind turbine was built about 1/4 mile from my home. There is a loud humming sound that is loudest at night. Some of my neighbors plan to move. It keeps us up at night. We are petitioning to have it taken down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Blake</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=876#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>Charlie Porter and Julie Sandry are absolutely correct.  Folks in Mars Hill, Maine have complained of all the affects that are described in Dr. Nina Pierpont&#039;s book.  The vibro-acoustic effects of Wind Turbine Syndrome are real.  You can find letters from Mars Hill people on www.windaction.org.  First Wind is planning a 60 MW project on the ridges above the 13 beautiful lakes of the Lincoln Lakes region of central Maine.  See www.friendsoflincolnlakes.org.  More than 500 year round homes and seasonal cottages on or near the lakes are within two kilometers of the 40 proposed GE turbines.  First Wind is using out-moded computer      ing and downplaying the potential effects of noise and vibro-acoustic impacts.  The Mars Hill folks will be out in full force at the hearing in Lincoln to try to help others avoid the misery of life under turbines.

These are unpredictable intermittent sources of trickles of electricity, so inefficient that the industry would never exist without tax subsidies and mandates to purchase the output.  Have we de-valued the health and welfare of our people to the point that we push health-threatening &quot;tax subsidy plantations&quot; on them regardless of the consequences?

We need to stop the madness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Porter and Julie Sandry are absolutely correct.  Folks in Mars Hill, Maine have complained of all the affects that are described in Dr. Nina Pierpont&#8217;s book.  The vibro-acoustic effects of Wind Turbine Syndrome are real.  You can find letters from Mars Hill people on <a href="http://www.windaction.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.windaction.org</a>.  First Wind is planning a 60 MW project on the ridges above the 13 beautiful lakes of the Lincoln Lakes region of central Maine.  See <a href="http://www.friendsoflincolnlakes.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.friendsoflincolnlakes.org</a>.  More than 500 year round homes and seasonal cottages on or near the lakes are within two kilometers of the 40 proposed GE turbines.  First Wind is using out-moded computer      ing and downplaying the potential effects of noise and vibro-acoustic impacts.  The Mars Hill folks will be out in full force at the hearing in Lincoln to try to help others avoid the misery of life under turbines.</p>
<p>These are unpredictable intermittent sources of trickles of electricity, so inefficient that the industry would never exist without tax subsidies and mandates to purchase the output.  Have we de-valued the health and welfare of our people to the point that we push health-threatening &#8220;tax subsidy plantations&#8221; on them regardless of the consequences?</p>
<p>We need to stop the madness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Blake</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/#comment-18908</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=876#comment-18908</guid>
		<description>Charlie Porter and Julie Sandry are absolutely correct.  Folks in Mars Hill, Maine have complained of all the affects that are described in Dr. Nina Pierpont&#039;s book.  The vibro-acoustic effects of Wind Turbine Syndrome are real.  You can find letters from Mars Hill people on www.windaction.org.  First Wind is planning a 60 MW project on the ridges above the 13 beautiful lakes of the Lincoln Lakes region of central Maine.  See www.friendsoflincolnlakes.org.  More than 500 year round homes and seasonal cottages on or near the lakes are within two kilometers of the 40 proposed GE turbines.  First Wind is using out-moded computer      ing and downplaying the potential effects of noise and vibro-acoustic impacts.  The Mars Hill folks will be out in full force at the hearing in Lincoln to try to help others avoid the misery of life under turbines.

These are unpredictable intermittent sources of trickles of electricity, so inefficient that the industry would never exist without tax subsidies and mandates to purchase the output.  Have we de-valued the health and welfare of our people to the point that we push health-threatening &quot;tax subsidy plantations&quot; on them regardless of the consequences?

We need to stop the madness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Porter and Julie Sandry are absolutely correct.  Folks in Mars Hill, Maine have complained of all the affects that are described in Dr. Nina Pierpont&#8217;s book.  The vibro-acoustic effects of Wind Turbine Syndrome are real.  You can find letters from Mars Hill people on <a href="http://www.windaction.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.windaction.org</a>.  First Wind is planning a 60 MW project on the ridges above the 13 beautiful lakes of the Lincoln Lakes region of central Maine.  See <a href="http://www.friendsoflincolnlakes.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.friendsoflincolnlakes.org</a>.  More than 500 year round homes and seasonal cottages on or near the lakes are within two kilometers of the 40 proposed GE turbines.  First Wind is using out-moded computer      ing and downplaying the potential effects of noise and vibro-acoustic impacts.  The Mars Hill folks will be out in full force at the hearing in Lincoln to try to help others avoid the misery of life under turbines.</p>
<p>These are unpredictable intermittent sources of trickles of electricity, so inefficient that the industry would never exist without tax subsidies and mandates to purchase the output.  Have we de-valued the health and welfare of our people to the point that we push health-threatening &#8220;tax subsidy plantations&#8221; on them regardless of the consequences?</p>
<p>We need to stop the madness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FED</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/18/wind-turbines-and-health/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>FED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=876#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>Great arguments above for going nuclear! No noise and can be placed far away from everyone. Nuclear power is much better than ugly noisy wind generators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great arguments above for going nuclear! No noise and can be placed far away from everyone. Nuclear power is much better than ugly noisy wind generators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

