Comments on: New Lighting Technology Offers Alternative To CFLs and LEDs http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/ Clean Tech News & Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. & More. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:05:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: DT http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/#comment-101950 DT Sun, 17 Jul 2011 13:37:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=791#comment-101950 2011 now! Where are these bulbs? 2011 now! Where are these bulbs?

]]> By: LanceH http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/#comment-1451 LanceH Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:32:45 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=791#comment-1451 Yeah, electrons exciting a phosphor layer is the same as a TV picture tube. It's early 20th century technology really. I just wonder if there's any weird health effects of having a room full of little electron guns. I guess as long as it's being defused it's ok. Yeah, electrons exciting a phosphor layer is the same as a TV picture tube. It’s early 20th century technology really.

I just wonder if there’s any weird health effects of having a room full of little electron guns. I guess as long as it’s being defused it’s ok.

]]> By: LanceH http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/#comment-18611 LanceH Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:32:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=791#comment-18611 Yeah, electrons exciting a phosphor layer is the same as a TV picture tube. It's early 20th century technology really. I just wonder if there's any weird health effects of having a room full of little electron guns. I guess as long as it's being defused it's ok. Yeah, electrons exciting a phosphor layer is the same as a TV picture tube. It’s early 20th century technology really.

I just wonder if there’s any weird health effects of having a room full of little electron guns. I guess as long as it’s being defused it’s ok.

]]> By: ben http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/#comment-1450 ben Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:32:41 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=791#comment-1450 how much is it,i think CFl is enough how much is it,i think CFl is enough

]]> By: ben http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/#comment-18610 ben Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:32:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=791#comment-18610 how much is it,i think CFl is enough how much is it,i think CFl is enough

]]> By: Uncle B http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/#comment-1449 Uncle B Sun, 17 May 2009 17:38:55 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=791#comment-1449 SEE: “A £2 energy-saving lightbulb that lasts for 60 years has been developed by scientists at Cambridge University. The researchers have designed a bulb that is three times more energy efficient than today’s best offer and can cut lighting bills by 75 per cent.The bulbs are 12 times more efficient that conventional tungsten bulbs and three times more efficient than compact fluorescent “energy efficient” bulbs. They can burn for 100,000 hours and they illuminate instantly and can be dimmed, unlike energy efficient bulbs.” http://theinfochief.com/ Betcha the "Big Boys" in "Black Suits" beat the snots out of this discovery and bought up the patents real fast! I haven't been able to fine even a trace of this science since this article was published? Help, please, anybody out there know anything else? SEE: “A £2 energy-saving lightbulb that lasts for 60 years has been developed by scientists at Cambridge University. The researchers have designed a bulb that is three times more energy efficient than today’s best offer and can cut lighting bills by 75 per cent.The bulbs are 12 times more efficient that conventional tungsten bulbs and three times more efficient than compact fluorescent “energy efficient” bulbs. They can burn for 100,000 hours and they illuminate instantly and can be dimmed, unlike energy efficient bulbs.”

http://theinfochief.com/

Betcha the “Big Boys” in “Black Suits” beat the snots out of this discovery and bought up the patents real fast! I haven’t been able to fine even a trace of this science since this article was published? Help, please, anybody out there know anything else?

]]> By: Uncle B http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/#comment-18609 Uncle B Sun, 17 May 2009 17:38:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=791#comment-18609 SEE: “A £2 energy-saving lightbulb that lasts for 60 years has been developed by scientists at Cambridge University. The researchers have designed a bulb that is three times more energy efficient than today’s best offer and can cut lighting bills by 75 per cent.The bulbs are 12 times more efficient that conventional tungsten bulbs and three times more efficient than compact fluorescent “energy efficient” bulbs. They can burn for 100,000 hours and they illuminate instantly and can be dimmed, unlike energy efficient bulbs.” http://theinfochief.com/ Betcha the "Big Boys" in "Black Suits" beat the snots out of this discovery and bought up the patents real fast! I haven't been able to fine even a trace of this science since this article was published? Help, please, anybody out there know anything else? SEE: “A £2 energy-saving lightbulb that lasts for 60 years has been developed by scientists at Cambridge University. The researchers have designed a bulb that is three times more energy efficient than today’s best offer and can cut lighting bills by 75 per cent.The bulbs are 12 times more efficient that conventional tungsten bulbs and three times more efficient than compact fluorescent “energy efficient” bulbs. They can burn for 100,000 hours and they illuminate instantly and can be dimmed, unlike energy efficient bulbs.”

http://theinfochief.com/

Betcha the “Big Boys” in “Black Suits” beat the snots out of this discovery and bought up the patents real fast! I haven’t been able to fine even a trace of this science since this article was published? Help, please, anybody out there know anything else?

]]> By: russ http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/#comment-1448 russ Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:16:24 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=791#comment-1448 Another couple of days and we will be in the 2nd quarter of 2009 - the product is now due sometime in 2009. CFl's are designed to be utilized in applications where they are turned on and left on for some time. They are not designed to be on for a minute or two and that will shorten their life. I don't understand the part about the patents pending but not available for public view. I thought once the filing is made it is a public document. Hopefully this is more than just smoke & mirrors. Another couple of days and we will be in the 2nd quarter of 2009 – the product is now due sometime in 2009.

CFl’s are designed to be utilized in applications where they are turned on and left on for some time. They are not designed to be on for a minute or two and that will shorten their life.

I don’t understand the part about the patents pending but not available for public view. I thought once the filing is made it is a public document.

Hopefully this is more than just smoke & mirrors.

]]> By: russ http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/#comment-18608 russ Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:16:00 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=791#comment-18608 Another couple of days and we will be in the 2nd quarter of 2009 - the product is now due sometime in 2009. CFl's are designed to be utilized in applications where they are turned on and left on for some time. They are not designed to be on for a minute or two and that will shorten their life. I don't understand the part about the patents pending but not available for public view. I thought once the filing is made it is a public document. Hopefully this is more than just smoke & mirrors. Another couple of days and we will be in the 2nd quarter of 2009 – the product is now due sometime in 2009.

CFl’s are designed to be utilized in applications where they are turned on and left on for some time. They are not designed to be on for a minute or two and that will shorten their life.

I don’t understand the part about the patents pending but not available for public view. I thought once the filing is made it is a public document.

Hopefully this is more than just smoke & mirrors.

]]> By: Tracy Saboe http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/01/new-lighting-technology-offers-alternative-to-cfls-and-leds/#comment-1447 Tracy Saboe Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:57:24 +0000 http://cleantechnica.com/?p=791#comment-1447 40 Lumins per Watt? Isn't that about the same as Florecents? I might potentially by these. I can't stand CFLs. They buzz, the light's off, and the electric radiation gives some people headaches. But if these are as efficient and cheap as CFLs then that's great. Tracy 40 Lumins per Watt? Isn’t that about the same as Florecents?

I might potentially by these. I can’t stand CFLs. They buzz, the light’s off, and the electric radiation gives some people headaches.

But if these are as efficient and cheap as CFLs then that’s great.

Tracy

]]>