<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NuScale Power and Hyperion Power Generation &#8211; Nuclear Power Systems That Are Not &quot;Extra Large&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: MAO Benson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comment-3037</link>
		<dc:creator>MAO Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=779#comment-3037</guid>
		<description>Very well pleased at the development on modular/small power generating plants. For me, this is the future power business. If solutions is scaled downward futher it will bring direct benefit to the individual and enlighten people better on the dynamics of nuclear solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well pleased at the development on modular/small power generating plants. For me, this is the future power business. If solutions is scaled downward futher it will bring direct benefit to the individual and enlighten people better on the dynamics of nuclear solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAO Benson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comment-18555</link>
		<dc:creator>MAO Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=779#comment-18555</guid>
		<description>Very well pleased at the development on modular/small power generating plants. For me, this is the future power business. If solutions is scaled downward futher it will bring direct benefit to the individual and enlighten people better on the dynamics of nuclear solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well pleased at the development on modular/small power generating plants. For me, this is the future power business. If solutions is scaled downward futher it will bring direct benefit to the individual and enlighten people better on the dynamics of nuclear solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Gibson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comment-3036</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 06:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=779#comment-3036</guid>
		<description>The weight of the fission product per house per year is about seventy grams. The fuel used including the recoverable U238 is about ten times this much. .HG..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The weight of the fission product per house per year is about seventy grams. The fuel used including the recoverable U238 is about ten times this much. .HG..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Gibson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comment-18554</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 06:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=779#comment-18554</guid>
		<description>The weight of the fission product per house per year is about seventy grams. The fuel used including the recoverable U238 is about ten times this much. .HG..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The weight of the fission product per house per year is about seventy grams. The fuel used including the recoverable U238 is about ten times this much. .HG..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Rogers</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comment-3035</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=779#comment-3035</guid>
		<description>I was struck by Dave Thomson&#039;s statement that &quot;The Saudis are rolling in cash with few places to invest for long-term gain.&quot;



That statement was made in September.  Now it&#039;s November and the fire sales on all the stock exchanges around the world are still going on strong! So the Saudi Arabians now have PLENTY of places to invest for long-term gain.

Those crude oil people are really very lucky, aren&#039;t they?  Things are shaking out for them almost as if the whole scenario was planned in advance.



Step one: jack up the price of oil to an unbelievable high.



Step two: accumulate as much money as you can for the fire sales that are bound to occur.



Step three: when the high petroleum prices finally result in recessions in the industrialized nations, and stock prices there plummet, come in at the bottom and start buying up industries at bargain prices.



But that smacks of paranoia and conspiracy theory, right?  It&#039;s not as if there&#039;s a cartel at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was struck by Dave Thomson&#8217;s statement that &#8220;The Saudis are rolling in cash with few places to invest for long-term gain.&#8221;</p>
<p>That statement was made in September.  Now it&#8217;s November and the fire sales on all the stock exchanges around the world are still going on strong! So the Saudi Arabians now have PLENTY of places to invest for long-term gain.</p>
<p>Those crude oil people are really very lucky, aren&#8217;t they?  Things are shaking out for them almost as if the whole scenario was planned in advance.</p>
<p>Step one: jack up the price of oil to an unbelievable high.</p>
<p>Step two: accumulate as much money as you can for the fire sales that are bound to occur.</p>
<p>Step three: when the high petroleum prices finally result in recessions in the industrialized nations, and stock prices there plummet, come in at the bottom and start buying up industries at bargain prices.</p>
<p>But that smacks of paranoia and conspiracy theory, right?  It&#8217;s not as if there&#8217;s a cartel at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyperion Power Generation Delivering First of 4000 Reactor Modules in June 2013 : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comment-3034</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyperion Power Generation Delivering First of 4000 Reactor Modules in June 2013 : CleanTechnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=779#comment-3034</guid>
		<description>[...] NuScale Power and Hyperion Power Generation - Nuclear Power Systems That Are Not “Extra Large” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NuScale Power and Hyperion Power Generation &#8211; Nuclear Power Systems That Are Not “Extra Large” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Thomson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=779#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>While America refuses to generate electricity using nuclear power, Saudi Arabia is getting on board.  It was curious that we entered into a new agreement to provide nuclear power technology to Saudi Arabia at about the same time that George Bush was over there begging them to open the oil spigot.  Was there a deal made between Bush and the Saudis to sell them the nuclear technology in return for help with the current fuel crisis?



But why would the Saudis need nuclear power plants?  For investments.  The Saudis are rolling in cash with few places to invest for long-term gain.  They also have a very well-educated and underutilized professional class.  World demand for energy can go nowhere but up.  The solution?  Saudi Arabia becomes a worldwide financier and builder of nuclear power plants - with desalination as a side option.  Unfettered by American environmental stupidity, they could mass-produce barge-mounted plants of standard design and tow them into place anywhere accessible to the ocean.  It&#039;s an approach Westinghouse tried to sell in the 1970&#039;s.  Standardized design, serialized production, and freedom from US environmental ninnyism would drop the cost of pre-fab nuclear plants substantially.



And what better place to put the pilot plants than at the north end of the Sea of Cortez?  Sheltered from tropical cyclones by Baja California, free of oppressive American environmental regulations, and with a ready customer for the generated power in Southern California, this is a natural.  The Mexican government could get a cut of the take in a sale/leaseback arrangement, and everyone would win. The Saudis would get a money-making long term investment and could become the world leaders in the design and operation of these plants and the host country would get a reliable source of power on the installment basis.



And, if the US refuses to sell the Saudis the technology, the French certainly will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While America refuses to generate electricity using nuclear power, Saudi Arabia is getting on board.  It was curious that we entered into a new agreement to provide nuclear power technology to Saudi Arabia at about the same time that George Bush was over there begging them to open the oil spigot.  Was there a deal made between Bush and the Saudis to sell them the nuclear technology in return for help with the current fuel crisis?</p>
<p>But why would the Saudis need nuclear power plants?  For investments.  The Saudis are rolling in cash with few places to invest for long-term gain.  They also have a very well-educated and underutilized professional class.  World demand for energy can go nowhere but up.  The solution?  Saudi Arabia becomes a worldwide financier and builder of nuclear power plants &#8211; with desalination as a side option.  Unfettered by American environmental stupidity, they could mass-produce barge-mounted plants of standard design and tow them into place anywhere accessible to the ocean.  It&#8217;s an approach Westinghouse tried to sell in the 1970&#8242;s.  Standardized design, serialized production, and freedom from US environmental ninnyism would drop the cost of pre-fab nuclear plants substantially.</p>
<p>And what better place to put the pilot plants than at the north end of the Sea of Cortez?  Sheltered from tropical cyclones by Baja California, free of oppressive American environmental regulations, and with a ready customer for the generated power in Southern California, this is a natural.  The Mexican government could get a cut of the take in a sale/leaseback arrangement, and everyone would win. The Saudis would get a money-making long term investment and could become the world leaders in the design and operation of these plants and the host country would get a reliable source of power on the installment basis.</p>
<p>And, if the US refuses to sell the Saudis the technology, the French certainly will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Thomson</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comment-18553</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=779#comment-18553</guid>
		<description>While America refuses to generate electricity using nuclear power, Saudi Arabia is getting on board.  It was curious that we entered into a new agreement to provide nuclear power technology to Saudi Arabia at about the same time that George Bush was over there begging them to open the oil spigot.  Was there a deal made between Bush and the Saudis to sell them the nuclear technology in return for help with the current fuel crisis?



But why would the Saudis need nuclear power plants?  For investments.  The Saudis are rolling in cash with few places to invest for long-term gain.  They also have a very well-educated and underutilized professional class.  World demand for energy can go nowhere but up.  The solution?  Saudi Arabia becomes a worldwide financier and builder of nuclear power plants - with desalination as a side option.  Unfettered by American environmental stupidity, they could mass-produce barge-mounted plants of standard design and tow them into place anywhere accessible to the ocean.  It&#039;s an approach Westinghouse tried to sell in the 1970&#039;s.  Standardized design, serialized production, and freedom from US environmental ninnyism would drop the cost of pre-fab nuclear plants substantially.



And what better place to put the pilot plants than at the north end of the Sea of Cortez?  Sheltered from tropical cyclones by Baja California, free of oppressive American environmental regulations, and with a ready customer for the generated power in Southern California, this is a natural.  The Mexican government could get a cut of the take in a sale/leaseback arrangement, and everyone would win. The Saudis would get a money-making long term investment and could become the world leaders in the design and operation of these plants and the host country would get a reliable source of power on the installment basis.



And, if the US refuses to sell the Saudis the technology, the French certainly will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While America refuses to generate electricity using nuclear power, Saudi Arabia is getting on board.  It was curious that we entered into a new agreement to provide nuclear power technology to Saudi Arabia at about the same time that George Bush was over there begging them to open the oil spigot.  Was there a deal made between Bush and the Saudis to sell them the nuclear technology in return for help with the current fuel crisis?</p>
<p>But why would the Saudis need nuclear power plants?  For investments.  The Saudis are rolling in cash with few places to invest for long-term gain.  They also have a very well-educated and underutilized professional class.  World demand for energy can go nowhere but up.  The solution?  Saudi Arabia becomes a worldwide financier and builder of nuclear power plants &#8211; with desalination as a side option.  Unfettered by American environmental stupidity, they could mass-produce barge-mounted plants of standard design and tow them into place anywhere accessible to the ocean.  It&#8217;s an approach Westinghouse tried to sell in the 1970&#8242;s.  Standardized design, serialized production, and freedom from US environmental ninnyism would drop the cost of pre-fab nuclear plants substantially.</p>
<p>And what better place to put the pilot plants than at the north end of the Sea of Cortez?  Sheltered from tropical cyclones by Baja California, free of oppressive American environmental regulations, and with a ready customer for the generated power in Southern California, this is a natural.  The Mexican government could get a cut of the take in a sale/leaseback arrangement, and everyone would win. The Saudis would get a money-making long term investment and could become the world leaders in the design and operation of these plants and the host country would get a reliable source of power on the installment basis.</p>
<p>And, if the US refuses to sell the Saudis the technology, the French certainly will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PBMR Contract - 4th Generation Nuclear Power Plant by 2014 : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comment-3032</link>
		<dc:creator>PBMR Contract - 4th Generation Nuclear Power Plant by 2014 : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=779#comment-3032</guid>
		<description>[...] NuScale Power and Hyperion Power Generation - Nuclear Power Systems That Are Not “Extra Large” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NuScale Power and Hyperion Power Generation &#8211; Nuclear Power Systems That Are Not “Extra Large” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Adams</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/31/nuscale-power-and-hyperion-power-generation-nuclear-power-systems-that-are-not-extra-large/#comment-3031</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=779#comment-3031</guid>
		<description>timbuktu:



Thank you for the comment and for the link. Very interesting article about distributed generation and the way that it mimics natural systems.



I guess I am just a small minded person. I like systems that are simple and understandable and I definitely like power plants that are small enough to inspect in just a few minutes. It makes it easy for operators to know their plant and recognize potential issues before they become big ones.



It is also nice when there are a variety of sources for power, none of which is critical by itself.



With small nuclear plants, it is possible to use such concepts as cogneration or combined cycles and it is easy to see that the need for transmission and distribution systems can be minimized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>timbuktu:</p>
<p>Thank you for the comment and for the link. Very interesting article about distributed generation and the way that it mimics natural systems.</p>
<p>I guess I am just a small minded person. I like systems that are simple and understandable and I definitely like power plants that are small enough to inspect in just a few minutes. It makes it easy for operators to know their plant and recognize potential issues before they become big ones.</p>
<p>It is also nice when there are a variety of sources for power, none of which is critical by itself.</p>
<p>With small nuclear plants, it is possible to use such concepts as cogneration or combined cycles and it is easy to see that the need for transmission and distribution systems can be minimized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

