<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear Power Enables Scheduled North Pole Cruises for at Least Two Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: huh 2</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-2068</link>
		<dc:creator>huh 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-2068</guid>
		<description>I agree with Huh - with global warming the concern is that the channels the ships make in the ice will not refreeze.  This is becoming a big problem for the beautiful polar bears that everyone revels in seeing.  Humans can be so selfish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Huh &#8211; with global warming the concern is that the channels the ships make in the ice will not refreeze.  This is becoming a big problem for the beautiful polar bears that everyone revels in seeing.  Humans can be so selfish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huh 2</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-18188</link>
		<dc:creator>huh 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-18188</guid>
		<description>I agree with Huh - with global warming the concern is that the channels the ships make in the ice will not refreeze.  This is becoming a big problem for the beautiful polar bears that everyone revels in seeing.  Humans can be so selfish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Huh &#8211; with global warming the concern is that the channels the ships make in the ice will not refreeze.  This is becoming a big problem for the beautiful polar bears that everyone revels in seeing.  Humans can be so selfish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Watching</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Watching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>I have heard the new reactors in Europe and Russia use 98% or more of the fuel compaired to only 2% utilization by the older reactors used by the U.S. comercial electric companies.

Any of you navy guys know the truth about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard the new reactors in Europe and Russia use 98% or more of the fuel compaired to only 2% utilization by the older reactors used by the U.S. comercial electric companies.</p>
<p>Any of you navy guys know the truth about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Watching</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-18187</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Watching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-18187</guid>
		<description>I have heard the new reactors in Europe and Russia use 98% or more of the fuel compaired to only 2% utilization by the older reactors used by the U.S. comercial electric companies.

Any of you navy guys know the truth about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard the new reactors in Europe and Russia use 98% or more of the fuel compaired to only 2% utilization by the older reactors used by the U.S. comercial electric companies.</p>
<p>Any of you navy guys know the truth about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Adams</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-2066</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-2066</guid>
		<description>Huh? - I hope you realize that the path of an icebreaker freezes back again. The wake is no more permanent than the wake from any other ship on the water.



The key is the reality that people want to travel and see the world. Based on the blog that I linked to, many of the passengers on the ship seem to be very conscious of the environment and worried about its future. That is the case with many eco-tourists who journey to remote areas.



However, flying around the world imposes a certain hazard to the atmosphere. My purpose for showing just how powerful atomic fission can be as a transportation fuel is to try to get people thinking about how we can move around an leave the smallest possible impact.



An emissions free ship certainly provides less long term impact than one that pumps out diesel smoke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? &#8211; I hope you realize that the path of an icebreaker freezes back again. The wake is no more permanent than the wake from any other ship on the water.</p>
<p>The key is the reality that people want to travel and see the world. Based on the blog that I linked to, many of the passengers on the ship seem to be very conscious of the environment and worried about its future. That is the case with many eco-tourists who journey to remote areas.</p>
<p>However, flying around the world imposes a certain hazard to the atmosphere. My purpose for showing just how powerful atomic fission can be as a transportation fuel is to try to get people thinking about how we can move around an leave the smallest possible impact.</p>
<p>An emissions free ship certainly provides less long term impact than one that pumps out diesel smoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Adams</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-18186</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-18186</guid>
		<description>Huh? - I hope you realize that the path of an icebreaker freezes back again. The wake is no more permanent than the wake from any other ship on the water.



The key is the reality that people want to travel and see the world. Based on the blog that I linked to, many of the passengers on the ship seem to be very conscious of the environment and worried about its future. That is the case with many eco-tourists who journey to remote areas.



However, flying around the world imposes a certain hazard to the atmosphere. My purpose for showing just how powerful atomic fission can be as a transportation fuel is to try to get people thinking about how we can move around an leave the smallest possible impact.



An emissions free ship certainly provides less long term impact than one that pumps out diesel smoke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? &#8211; I hope you realize that the path of an icebreaker freezes back again. The wake is no more permanent than the wake from any other ship on the water.</p>
<p>The key is the reality that people want to travel and see the world. Based on the blog that I linked to, many of the passengers on the ship seem to be very conscious of the environment and worried about its future. That is the case with many eco-tourists who journey to remote areas.</p>
<p>However, flying around the world imposes a certain hazard to the atmosphere. My purpose for showing just how powerful atomic fission can be as a transportation fuel is to try to get people thinking about how we can move around an leave the smallest possible impact.</p>
<p>An emissions free ship certainly provides less long term impact than one that pumps out diesel smoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Adams</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-2065</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-2065</guid>
		<description>No Nukes - You use some colorful language, but can you give me any examples of harm to humans or other animals from the by-products of nuclear power reactor operation?



Every single minute that fossil fuel plants are operating, they are spewing deadly waste products directly into the environment. We have accepted the benefits provided by combustion for thousands of years - since we learned to control fire - but also accepted and mitigated the risks.



We learned how to build chimneys so that the smoke could be safely piped outside of our cabins and tents. We have learned to build tall smokestacks with scrubbers and bag houses, but those only dilute and share the problem with wide areas or put the toxins in sludge pools and land fills.



With nuclear power, we know that the by-products are dangerous if not properly controlled, so we control them. For fifty years, nuclear power plants around the world have been carefully isolating and storing their byproducts. We know where almost every gram is stored and it does not take up much room.



Most of the byproducts are valuable raw material just waiting for a time when it can be recycled into new plants or used for other really exciting applications like sterilizing medical tools, providing long-life batteries, or irradiating food to protect it from spoiling or bacteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Nukes &#8211; You use some colorful language, but can you give me any examples of harm to humans or other animals from the by-products of nuclear power reactor operation?</p>
<p>Every single minute that fossil fuel plants are operating, they are spewing deadly waste products directly into the environment. We have accepted the benefits provided by combustion for thousands of years &#8211; since we learned to control fire &#8211; but also accepted and mitigated the risks.</p>
<p>We learned how to build chimneys so that the smoke could be safely piped outside of our cabins and tents. We have learned to build tall smokestacks with scrubbers and bag houses, but those only dilute and share the problem with wide areas or put the toxins in sludge pools and land fills.</p>
<p>With nuclear power, we know that the by-products are dangerous if not properly controlled, so we control them. For fifty years, nuclear power plants around the world have been carefully isolating and storing their byproducts. We know where almost every gram is stored and it does not take up much room.</p>
<p>Most of the byproducts are valuable raw material just waiting for a time when it can be recycled into new plants or used for other really exciting applications like sterilizing medical tools, providing long-life batteries, or irradiating food to protect it from spoiling or bacteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Adams</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-18185</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-18185</guid>
		<description>No Nukes - You use some colorful language, but can you give me any examples of harm to humans or other animals from the by-products of nuclear power reactor operation?



Every single minute that fossil fuel plants are operating, they are spewing deadly waste products directly into the environment. We have accepted the benefits provided by combustion for thousands of years - since we learned to control fire - but also accepted and mitigated the risks.



We learned how to build chimneys so that the smoke could be safely piped outside of our cabins and tents. We have learned to build tall smokestacks with scrubbers and bag houses, but those only dilute and share the problem with wide areas or put the toxins in sludge pools and land fills.



With nuclear power, we know that the by-products are dangerous if not properly controlled, so we control them. For fifty years, nuclear power plants around the world have been carefully isolating and storing their byproducts. We know where almost every gram is stored and it does not take up much room.



Most of the byproducts are valuable raw material just waiting for a time when it can be recycled into new plants or used for other really exciting applications like sterilizing medical tools, providing long-life batteries, or irradiating food to protect it from spoiling or bacteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Nukes &#8211; You use some colorful language, but can you give me any examples of harm to humans or other animals from the by-products of nuclear power reactor operation?</p>
<p>Every single minute that fossil fuel plants are operating, they are spewing deadly waste products directly into the environment. We have accepted the benefits provided by combustion for thousands of years &#8211; since we learned to control fire &#8211; but also accepted and mitigated the risks.</p>
<p>We learned how to build chimneys so that the smoke could be safely piped outside of our cabins and tents. We have learned to build tall smokestacks with scrubbers and bag houses, but those only dilute and share the problem with wide areas or put the toxins in sludge pools and land fills.</p>
<p>With nuclear power, we know that the by-products are dangerous if not properly controlled, so we control them. For fifty years, nuclear power plants around the world have been carefully isolating and storing their byproducts. We know where almost every gram is stored and it does not take up much room.</p>
<p>Most of the byproducts are valuable raw material just waiting for a time when it can be recycled into new plants or used for other really exciting applications like sterilizing medical tools, providing long-life batteries, or irradiating food to protect it from spoiling or bacteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no nukes</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-2064</link>
		<dc:creator>no nukes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-2064</guid>
		<description>Might not have &quot;plumes of smoke&quot; coming from the stack, but the pollution the nuclear process produces is so diabolically toxic to all life in small amounts. Yes, nuclear is a marvel. But the downside of the toxic nuclear waste is far greater than upside of the marvel.

While trying to paint nuclear in a bright light balance it with the black abyss of the waste it producers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might not have &#8220;plumes of smoke&#8221; coming from the stack, but the pollution the nuclear process produces is so diabolically toxic to all life in small amounts. Yes, nuclear is a marvel. But the downside of the toxic nuclear waste is far greater than upside of the marvel.</p>
<p>While trying to paint nuclear in a bright light balance it with the black abyss of the waste it producers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no nukes</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-18184</link>
		<dc:creator>no nukes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-18184</guid>
		<description>Might not have &quot;plumes of smoke&quot; coming from the stack, but the pollution the nuclear process produces is so diabolically toxic to all life in small amounts. Yes, nuclear is a marvel. But the downside of the toxic nuclear waste is far greater than upside of the marvel.

While trying to paint nuclear in a bright light balance it with the black abyss of the waste it producers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might not have &#8220;plumes of smoke&#8221; coming from the stack, but the pollution the nuclear process produces is so diabolically toxic to all life in small amounts. Yes, nuclear is a marvel. But the downside of the toxic nuclear waste is far greater than upside of the marvel.</p>
<p>While trying to paint nuclear in a bright light balance it with the black abyss of the waste it producers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huh?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>Huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure a nuclear powered ice breaker carving up the diminishing arctic ice sheet is the best example of clean, sustainable technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure a nuclear powered ice breaker carving up the diminishing arctic ice sheet is the best example of clean, sustainable technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huh?</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/17/nuclear-power-enables-scheduled-north-pole-cruises-for-at-least-two-companies/#comment-18183</link>
		<dc:creator>Huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=691#comment-18183</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure a nuclear powered ice breaker carving up the diminishing arctic ice sheet is the best example of clean, sustainable technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure a nuclear powered ice breaker carving up the diminishing arctic ice sheet is the best example of clean, sustainable technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

