<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheap Green Computer Runs on 2 Watts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichelleBennett</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>MichelleBennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=591#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>@ Paco Nathan:



I agree with you on the remote information. My laptop fried recently, but some of my most important information is located online. My contacts, links, and even notes are scattered across the internet for this very reason.



But on the flip side, I wonder if Ian is right - would a company still use our data against us in some kind of contract dispute? I look at cell phone companies and other notorious services and wonder...



@ Flava: my pleasure! It&#039;s still a pretty geeky term if you&#039;re not knee deep in gadgets these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Paco Nathan:</p>
<p>I agree with you on the remote information. My laptop fried recently, but some of my most important information is located online. My contacts, links, and even notes are scattered across the internet for this very reason.</p>
<p>But on the flip side, I wonder if Ian is right &#8211; would a company still use our data against us in some kind of contract dispute? I look at cell phone companies and other notorious services and wonder&#8230;</p>
<p>@ Flava: my pleasure! It&#8217;s still a pretty geeky term if you&#8217;re not knee deep in gadgets these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichelleBennett</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/#comment-18039</link>
		<dc:creator>MichelleBennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=591#comment-18039</guid>
		<description>@ Paco Nathan:



I agree with you on the remote information. My laptop fried recently, but some of my most important information is located online. My contacts, links, and even notes are scattered across the internet for this very reason.



But on the flip side, I wonder if Ian is right - would a company still use our data against us in some kind of contract dispute? I look at cell phone companies and other notorious services and wonder...



@ Flava: my pleasure! It&#039;s still a pretty geeky term if you&#039;re not knee deep in gadgets these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Paco Nathan:</p>
<p>I agree with you on the remote information. My laptop fried recently, but some of my most important information is located online. My contacts, links, and even notes are scattered across the internet for this very reason.</p>
<p>But on the flip side, I wonder if Ian is right &#8211; would a company still use our data against us in some kind of contract dispute? I look at cell phone companies and other notorious services and wonder&#8230;</p>
<p>@ Flava: my pleasure! It&#8217;s still a pretty geeky term if you&#8217;re not knee deep in gadgets these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: website design</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>website design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=591#comment-1398</guid>
		<description>Can I get one in blue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I get one in blue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: website design</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/#comment-18038</link>
		<dc:creator>website design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=591#comment-18038</guid>
		<description>Can I get one in blue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I get one in blue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kemmish</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kemmish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=591#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>When I were a lad, we called it time sharing.  It&#039;s what PC&#039;s were invented to do away with.  It&#039;s difficult to convey just how loathed time sharing was.  Not only for the fact that it was very expensive, not only for the fact that if you ran out of resources, you couldn&#039;t just get a bigger computer (although STSC allowed you to ipl different &quot;sizes&quot; of virtual IBM 370 and pay appropriately), but also - and far from least - if you had a dispute with the provider, they had physical possession of your data.  As bargaining chips go, that&#039;s a biggy!



Since PCs arrived, someone has come along every three to five years with a &quot;smart terminal&quot; and claimed that a return to time sharing is the answer  to all our problems.  So far, every single one of them has been wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I were a lad, we called it time sharing.  It&#8217;s what PC&#8217;s were invented to do away with.  It&#8217;s difficult to convey just how loathed time sharing was.  Not only for the fact that it was very expensive, not only for the fact that if you ran out of resources, you couldn&#8217;t just get a bigger computer (although STSC allowed you to ipl different &#8220;sizes&#8221; of virtual IBM 370 and pay appropriately), but also &#8211; and far from least &#8211; if you had a dispute with the provider, they had physical possession of your data.  As bargaining chips go, that&#8217;s a biggy!</p>
<p>Since PCs arrived, someone has come along every three to five years with a &#8220;smart terminal&#8221; and claimed that a return to time sharing is the answer  to all our problems.  So far, every single one of them has been wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kemmish</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/#comment-18037</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kemmish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=591#comment-18037</guid>
		<description>When I were a lad, we called it time sharing.  It&#039;s what PC&#039;s were invented to do away with.  It&#039;s difficult to convey just how loathed time sharing was.  Not only for the fact that it was very expensive, not only for the fact that if you ran out of resources, you couldn&#039;t just get a bigger computer (although STSC allowed you to ipl different &quot;sizes&quot; of virtual IBM 370 and pay appropriately), but also - and far from least - if you had a dispute with the provider, they had physical possession of your data.  As bargaining chips go, that&#039;s a biggy!



Since PCs arrived, someone has come along every three to five years with a &quot;smart terminal&quot; and claimed that a return to time sharing is the answer  to all our problems.  So far, every single one of them has been wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I were a lad, we called it time sharing.  It&#8217;s what PC&#8217;s were invented to do away with.  It&#8217;s difficult to convey just how loathed time sharing was.  Not only for the fact that it was very expensive, not only for the fact that if you ran out of resources, you couldn&#8217;t just get a bigger computer (although STSC allowed you to ipl different &#8220;sizes&#8221; of virtual IBM 370 and pay appropriately), but also &#8211; and far from least &#8211; if you had a dispute with the provider, they had physical possession of your data.  As bargaining chips go, that&#8217;s a biggy!</p>
<p>Since PCs arrived, someone has come along every three to five years with a &#8220;smart terminal&#8221; and claimed that a return to time sharing is the answer  to all our problems.  So far, every single one of them has been wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flava</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Flava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=591#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>Thanks for putting the link to Cloud COmputing, I had never heard of it before and this article (while also interesting in itself) offered add&#039;l jump-to&#039;s as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting the link to Cloud COmputing, I had never heard of it before and this article (while also interesting in itself) offered add&#8217;l jump-to&#8217;s as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flava</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/#comment-18036</link>
		<dc:creator>Flava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=591#comment-18036</guid>
		<description>Thanks for putting the link to Cloud COmputing, I had never heard of it before and this article (while also interesting in itself) offered add&#039;l jump-to&#039;s as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting the link to Cloud COmputing, I had never heard of it before and this article (while also interesting in itself) offered add&#8217;l jump-to&#8217;s as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paco Nathan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Paco Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=591#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Probably best to keep healthy skepticism about any product pricing claims until after they&#039;re shipping in quantity... but it seems like a wise approach in the long run.



So many people use &quot;cloud computing&quot; already without seeing it directly -- for email, web search, video, online shopping, and probably the hosting for this blog as well.



In one sense, cloud computing can be leveraged for better power efficiency in ways not unlike plug-in hybrid vehicles. Server facilities (e.g., Google in Oregon) are located close to power generation plants. Less energy gets lost in transmission. Laptop computers probably won&#039;t become nearly as efficient, due to issues of weight, portability, durability, etc. It makes sense to push the &quot;heavy lifting&quot; for computation and storage off to remote servers which are more efficient -- as long as privacy concerns are managed carefully.



In another sense, my laptop&#039;s disk drive went out last week. I had backups for data, but most important data (contacts, email, work documents, source code) were all out on cloud resources. Those took only moments to restore, once a new disk was installed. In short, quite robust and simple to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Probably best to keep healthy skepticism about any product pricing claims until after they&#8217;re shipping in quantity&#8230; but it seems like a wise approach in the long run.</p>
<p>So many people use &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; already without seeing it directly &#8212; for email, web search, video, online shopping, and probably the hosting for this blog as well.</p>
<p>In one sense, cloud computing can be leveraged for better power efficiency in ways not unlike plug-in hybrid vehicles. Server facilities (e.g., Google in Oregon) are located close to power generation plants. Less energy gets lost in transmission. Laptop computers probably won&#8217;t become nearly as efficient, due to issues of weight, portability, durability, etc. It makes sense to push the &#8220;heavy lifting&#8221; for computation and storage off to remote servers which are more efficient &#8212; as long as privacy concerns are managed carefully.</p>
<p>In another sense, my laptop&#8217;s disk drive went out last week. I had backups for data, but most important data (contacts, email, work documents, source code) were all out on cloud resources. Those took only moments to restore, once a new disk was installed. In short, quite robust and simple to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paco Nathan</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/29/cheap-green-computer-runs-on-2-watts/#comment-18035</link>
		<dc:creator>Paco Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=591#comment-18035</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Probably best to keep healthy skepticism about any product pricing claims until after they&#039;re shipping in quantity... but it seems like a wise approach in the long run.



So many people use &quot;cloud computing&quot; already without seeing it directly -- for email, web search, video, online shopping, and probably the hosting for this blog as well.



In one sense, cloud computing can be leveraged for better power efficiency in ways not unlike plug-in hybrid vehicles. Server facilities (e.g., Google in Oregon) are located close to power generation plants. Less energy gets lost in transmission. Laptop computers probably won&#039;t become nearly as efficient, due to issues of weight, portability, durability, etc. It makes sense to push the &quot;heavy lifting&quot; for computation and storage off to remote servers which are more efficient -- as long as privacy concerns are managed carefully.



In another sense, my laptop&#039;s disk drive went out last week. I had backups for data, but most important data (contacts, email, work documents, source code) were all out on cloud resources. Those took only moments to restore, once a new disk was installed. In short, quite robust and simple to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Probably best to keep healthy skepticism about any product pricing claims until after they&#8217;re shipping in quantity&#8230; but it seems like a wise approach in the long run.</p>
<p>So many people use &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; already without seeing it directly &#8212; for email, web search, video, online shopping, and probably the hosting for this blog as well.</p>
<p>In one sense, cloud computing can be leveraged for better power efficiency in ways not unlike plug-in hybrid vehicles. Server facilities (e.g., Google in Oregon) are located close to power generation plants. Less energy gets lost in transmission. Laptop computers probably won&#8217;t become nearly as efficient, due to issues of weight, portability, durability, etc. It makes sense to push the &#8220;heavy lifting&#8221; for computation and storage off to remote servers which are more efficient &#8212; as long as privacy concerns are managed carefully.</p>
<p>In another sense, my laptop&#8217;s disk drive went out last week. I had backups for data, but most important data (contacts, email, work documents, source code) were all out on cloud resources. Those took only moments to restore, once a new disk was installed. In short, quite robust and simple to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

