<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Jersey May End Solar Rebate Program to Grow Market Faster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/25/new-jersey-may-end-solar-rebate-program-in-order-to-grow-market-faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/25/new-jersey-may-end-solar-rebate-program-in-order-to-grow-market-faster/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Gulyas</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/25/new-jersey-may-end-solar-rebate-program-in-order-to-grow-market-faster/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Gulyas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=578#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Rebates help overcome resistance to installation, especially for those with lower incomes who don&#039;t have the money to spend up front, but who could certainly live better if they weren&#039;t spending more and more of their money on energy costs.  As energy costs rise, solar pays back faster and faster (about seven years for  solar thermal water heating systems, for example).  Those who criticize the solar industry for requesting rebates to jump start a viable industry curiously don&#039;t seem to also criticize the massive subsidies that the oil industry has received.   Solar just wants a level playing field with fossil fuels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebates help overcome resistance to installation, especially for those with lower incomes who don&#8217;t have the money to spend up front, but who could certainly live better if they weren&#8217;t spending more and more of their money on energy costs.  As energy costs rise, solar pays back faster and faster (about seven years for  solar thermal water heating systems, for example).  Those who criticize the solar industry for requesting rebates to jump start a viable industry curiously don&#8217;t seem to also criticize the massive subsidies that the oil industry has received.   Solar just wants a level playing field with fossil fuels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Gulyas</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/25/new-jersey-may-end-solar-rebate-program-in-order-to-grow-market-faster/#comment-17937</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Gulyas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=578#comment-17937</guid>
		<description>Rebates help overcome resistance to installation, especially for those with lower incomes who don&#039;t have the money to spend up front, but who could certainly live better if they weren&#039;t spending more and more of their money on energy costs.  As energy costs rise, solar pays back faster and faster (about seven years for  solar thermal water heating systems, for example).  Those who criticize the solar industry for requesting rebates to jump start a viable industry curiously don&#039;t seem to also criticize the massive subsidies that the oil industry has received.   Solar just wants a level playing field with fossil fuels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebates help overcome resistance to installation, especially for those with lower incomes who don&#8217;t have the money to spend up front, but who could certainly live better if they weren&#8217;t spending more and more of their money on energy costs.  As energy costs rise, solar pays back faster and faster (about seven years for  solar thermal water heating systems, for example).  Those who criticize the solar industry for requesting rebates to jump start a viable industry curiously don&#8217;t seem to also criticize the massive subsidies that the oil industry has received.   Solar just wants a level playing field with fossil fuels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khurt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/25/new-jersey-may-end-solar-rebate-program-in-order-to-grow-market-faster/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>Khurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=578#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>Are the rebates necessary? Is it because solar can not justify itself financially?  How will the solar panels produce electricity when snow covered or when the sky is overcast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the rebates necessary? Is it because solar can not justify itself financially?  How will the solar panels produce electricity when snow covered or when the sky is overcast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khurt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/25/new-jersey-may-end-solar-rebate-program-in-order-to-grow-market-faster/#comment-17935</link>
		<dc:creator>Khurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=578#comment-17935</guid>
		<description>Are the rebates necessary? Is it because solar can not justify itself financially?  How will the solar panels produce electricity when snow covered or when the sky is overcast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the rebates necessary? Is it because solar can not justify itself financially?  How will the solar panels produce electricity when snow covered or when the sky is overcast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khurt</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/25/new-jersey-may-end-solar-rebate-program-in-order-to-grow-market-faster/#comment-17936</link>
		<dc:creator>Khurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=578#comment-17936</guid>
		<description>Are the rebates necessary? Is it because solar can not justify itself financially?  How will the solar panels produce electricity when snow covered or when the sky is overcast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the rebates necessary? Is it because solar can not justify itself financially?  How will the solar panels produce electricity when snow covered or when the sky is overcast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Adams</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/25/new-jersey-may-end-solar-rebate-program-in-order-to-grow-market-faster/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=578#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>No wonder New Jersey plans to halt the rebates. Based on your numbers, they would still have another $5 billion or so left to spend in order to encourage enough solar system installations to reach 2.12% of the electricity market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No wonder New Jersey plans to halt the rebates. Based on your numbers, they would still have another $5 billion or so left to spend in order to encourage enough solar system installations to reach 2.12% of the electricity market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Adams</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/25/new-jersey-may-end-solar-rebate-program-in-order-to-grow-market-faster/#comment-17934</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/?p=578#comment-17934</guid>
		<description>No wonder New Jersey plans to halt the rebates. Based on your numbers, they would still have another $5 billion or so left to spend in order to encourage enough solar system installations to reach 2.12% of the electricity market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No wonder New Jersey plans to halt the rebates. Based on your numbers, they would still have another $5 billion or so left to spend in order to encourage enough solar system installations to reach 2.12% of the electricity market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

