40,000 Solar Jobs in a Cloudy Country: Germany's Solar Subsidies Debated

344594764_0cc35ea65b_s.jpg

A May 16 article in the New York Times focused on the debate in Germany regarding whether generous subsidies for solar energy should be continued. Buried in the story was the remarkable fact that Germany has created 40,000 jobs in formerly blighted industrial areas by “turbo-charging” the growth of the solar industry there. Imagine if our government took a leadership role in jump-starting solar production in areas like Pittsburgh, Indiana, and Michigan, where much of the infrastructure and work force still remain from the declining steel and auto industries. Some facts:

  • Germany has half the sunshine hours of San Diego.
  • An American company, Signet Solar, chose to build its thin film plant in Germany, not the U.S.
  • The engine that grew Germany’s solar industry is its feed-in tariff, which requires power companies to buy citizen-produced solar energy at an above-market rate for 20 years. Citizens have responded — by putting solar panels on nearly every available surface.
  • Spain, France, Italy and Greece have copied Germany’s subsidy plan. California is using a version of it by requiring utilities to pay customers rebates for the amount of energy they would have bought if they didn’t have solar modules.
  • Growing solar has helped other alternative energy production to grow as well: Germany gets 14.2 percent of its electricity from renewable sources, putting it ahead of the EU target of 12.5 percent from renewables by 2010.

Critics of the subsidies argue that they will eventually make solar energy too costly vs. other energy sources; defenders argue that the support for solar still doesn’t match subsidies to the dirty and declining coal industry, and that conventional energy costs will rise at a higher rate. Others charge that this is a classic attempt by large centralized power companies to weaken the role of distributed generation — citizen-generated, de-centralized power sources. Whether or not Germany decreases subsidies at a faster rate than planned, for now they are the world’s largest market for PV systems.

“To develop a technology, you’ve got to create an industry,” said Mr. Milner, the chief executive of Q-Cells, referring to the German success story. “You can wait and wait and wait for costs to come down, but it takes too long.” –Mark Landler, New York Times, 5/16/08

Repost this article
  • Pingback: Matt Goes Green » Blog Archive » Feed In Tariff in the works

  • Pingback: Innovative Solar Cell wins R&D 100 Award : CleanTechnica

  • Pingback: Renewable Energy: Feed-in Tariff (FIT) Introduced in Congress : CleanTechnica

  • Pingback: GreenBlog.ir » Blog Archive » Germany Creates Boom in Geothermal Electricity

  • Pingback: Germany Creates Boom in Geothermal Electricity : CleanTechnica

  • http://atomicinsights.blogspot.com Rod Adams

    What will happen to those 40,000 jobs if the solar subsidies end? Are the manufacturers in Germany close to being efficient enough to ship their bulky products all over the world at a price that will be competitive with more local production?

    With regard to subsidies provided to the fossil fuel and nuclear industries, does anyone ever talk about an income and expense computation from the taxpayer point of view? It is pretty obvious that there are subsidies and tax advantages for established energy industries, but it should also be pretty obvious that those industries ought to be paying a rather substantial tax bill.

    Does anyone know of a good source that counts up both sides of the ledger so that we can make good decisions about the value of the investment that we have made and are making in various forms of energy supply?

  • http://atomicinsights.blogspot.com Rod Adams

    What will happen to those 40,000 jobs if the solar subsidies end? Are the manufacturers in Germany close to being efficient enough to ship their bulky products all over the world at a price that will be competitive with more local production?

    With regard to subsidies provided to the fossil fuel and nuclear industries, does anyone ever talk about an income and expense computation from the taxpayer point of view? It is pretty obvious that there are subsidies and tax advantages for established energy industries, but it should also be pretty obvious that those industries ought to be paying a rather substantial tax bill.

    Does anyone know of a good source that counts up both sides of the ledger so that we can make good decisions about the value of the investment that we have made and are making in various forms of energy supply?

Pin It