<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wall Street Cools on Coal &#8212; Along with the American Public</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: XB Cold Fingers</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>XB Cold Fingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/#comment-968</guid>
		<description>History is repeating itself.  This is what happened to Nuclear Power.



Nuclear Power was killed, not by the disasters at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, nor by the opposition of an increasingly aware public, nor the flaws and gaps of the technology (no waste disposal), nor the socio-political ramifications of the technology (nuclear power requires a significant national security apparatus that may be incompatible with civil liberties) but by the realization by the investment bankers that their multi-billion investment can instantly turn into a pile of radioactive garbage upon which there is no ROI.



In short, the bankers on Wall Street stopped investing in nuclear power because they saw it as a bad way to make money.



They are right. Recently Florida Power &amp; Light, FPL, asked the regulators for permission to build 2 additional plants  at the aptly named &#039;Turkey Point&#039; facility. They forecast $18 billion for a 3 GW facility that will be completed in 10 or 12 years. Assuming no cost overruns - tough to do on a 10 or 12 year project - it will cost $6 per watt. That&#039;s the cost of solar with zero subsidies.  And Solar is easy to build. Requires no national security infrastructure, produces very few BTUs of waste heat, zero toxic wastes, zero radioactive waste, works well the day after a disaster, etc., etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History is repeating itself.  This is what happened to Nuclear Power.</p>
<p>Nuclear Power was killed, not by the disasters at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, nor by the opposition of an increasingly aware public, nor the flaws and gaps of the technology (no waste disposal), nor the socio-political ramifications of the technology (nuclear power requires a significant national security apparatus that may be incompatible with civil liberties) but by the realization by the investment bankers that their multi-billion investment can instantly turn into a pile of radioactive garbage upon which there is no ROI.</p>
<p>In short, the bankers on Wall Street stopped investing in nuclear power because they saw it as a bad way to make money.</p>
<p>They are right. Recently Florida Power &amp; Light, FPL, asked the regulators for permission to build 2 additional plants  at the aptly named &#8216;Turkey Point&#8217; facility. They forecast $18 billion for a 3 GW facility that will be completed in 10 or 12 years. Assuming no cost overruns &#8211; tough to do on a 10 or 12 year project &#8211; it will cost $6 per watt. That&#8217;s the cost of solar with zero subsidies.  And Solar is easy to build. Requires no national security infrastructure, produces very few BTUs of waste heat, zero toxic wastes, zero radioactive waste, works well the day after a disaster, etc., etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XB Cold Fingers</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/#comment-17199</link>
		<dc:creator>XB Cold Fingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/#comment-17199</guid>
		<description>History is repeating itself.  This is what happened to Nuclear Power.



Nuclear Power was killed, not by the disasters at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, nor by the opposition of an increasingly aware public, nor the flaws and gaps of the technology (no waste disposal), nor the socio-political ramifications of the technology (nuclear power requires a significant national security apparatus that may be incompatible with civil liberties) but by the realization by the investment bankers that their multi-billion investment can instantly turn into a pile of radioactive garbage upon which there is no ROI.



In short, the bankers on Wall Street stopped investing in nuclear power because they saw it as a bad way to make money.



They are right. Recently Florida Power &amp; Light, FPL, asked the regulators for permission to build 2 additional plants  at the aptly named &#039;Turkey Point&#039; facility. They forecast $18 billion for a 3 GW facility that will be completed in 10 or 12 years. Assuming no cost overruns - tough to do on a 10 or 12 year project - it will cost $6 per watt. That&#039;s the cost of solar with zero subsidies.  And Solar is easy to build. Requires no national security infrastructure, produces very few BTUs of waste heat, zero toxic wastes, zero radioactive waste, works well the day after a disaster, etc., etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History is repeating itself.  This is what happened to Nuclear Power.</p>
<p>Nuclear Power was killed, not by the disasters at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, nor by the opposition of an increasingly aware public, nor the flaws and gaps of the technology (no waste disposal), nor the socio-political ramifications of the technology (nuclear power requires a significant national security apparatus that may be incompatible with civil liberties) but by the realization by the investment bankers that their multi-billion investment can instantly turn into a pile of radioactive garbage upon which there is no ROI.</p>
<p>In short, the bankers on Wall Street stopped investing in nuclear power because they saw it as a bad way to make money.</p>
<p>They are right. Recently Florida Power &amp; Light, FPL, asked the regulators for permission to build 2 additional plants  at the aptly named &#8216;Turkey Point&#8217; facility. They forecast $18 billion for a 3 GW facility that will be completed in 10 or 12 years. Assuming no cost overruns &#8211; tough to do on a 10 or 12 year project &#8211; it will cost $6 per watt. That&#8217;s the cost of solar with zero subsidies.  And Solar is easy to build. Requires no national security infrastructure, produces very few BTUs of waste heat, zero toxic wastes, zero radioactive waste, works well the day after a disaster, etc., etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peak Coal as Early as 2025 : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>Peak Coal as Early as 2025 : CleanTechnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/#comment-967</guid>
		<description>[...] Posts: Solar Thermal Electricity: Can it Replace Coal, Gas, &amp; Oil?  Wall Street Cools on Coal - Along With the American Public  Solar Panels and the Quest for $1/Watt  Air Force Will Be Coal-Powered by 2011  Add a comment or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posts: Solar Thermal Electricity: Can it Replace Coal, Gas, &amp; Oil?  Wall Street Cools on Coal &#8211; Along With the American Public  Solar Panels and the Quest for $1/Watt  Air Force Will Be Coal-Powered by 2011  Add a comment or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/#comment-966</guid>
		<description>With investors looking away from coal, it seems as though the time is ripe for renewables.  Investors want cleaner alternatives that generate more public support (and less carbon).



For those interested in investment prospects and the future of renewable energy, the Renewable Energy Finance Forum (REFF), being held this June in New York City, provides an opportunity for all stakeholders to share their views and hear commentary from industry leaders.  Join investment bankers, venture capitalists, government officials, renewable energy associations, and others at this event.  For more information, please visit www.reffwallstreet.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With investors looking away from coal, it seems as though the time is ripe for renewables.  Investors want cleaner alternatives that generate more public support (and less carbon).</p>
<p>For those interested in investment prospects and the future of renewable energy, the Renewable Energy Finance Forum (REFF), being held this June in New York City, provides an opportunity for all stakeholders to share their views and hear commentary from industry leaders.  Join investment bankers, venture capitalists, government officials, renewable energy associations, and others at this event.  For more information, please visit <a href="http://www.reffwallstreet.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.reffwallstreet.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/#comment-17198</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/04/23/wall-street-cools-on-coal-along-with-the-american-public/#comment-17198</guid>
		<description>With investors looking away from coal, it seems as though the time is ripe for renewables.  Investors want cleaner alternatives that generate more public support (and less carbon).



For those interested in investment prospects and the future of renewable energy, the Renewable Energy Finance Forum (REFF), being held this June in New York City, provides an opportunity for all stakeholders to share their views and hear commentary from industry leaders.  Join investment bankers, venture capitalists, government officials, renewable energy associations, and others at this event.  For more information, please visit www.reffwallstreet.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With investors looking away from coal, it seems as though the time is ripe for renewables.  Investors want cleaner alternatives that generate more public support (and less carbon).</p>
<p>For those interested in investment prospects and the future of renewable energy, the Renewable Energy Finance Forum (REFF), being held this June in New York City, provides an opportunity for all stakeholders to share their views and hear commentary from industry leaders.  Join investment bankers, venture capitalists, government officials, renewable energy associations, and others at this event.  For more information, please visit <a href="http://www.reffwallstreet.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.reffwallstreet.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

