By compressing hydrogen to form a superconductor they are just ejecting electrons as well.

I also stated almost 2 years ago that I bet the freezing Merle just slowed down the electron flow in the superconducting material making it super conduct, they can now view that it does indeed slow down the electrons.

I have worked with monatomic hydrogen that is a room temperature superconductor that does not need compressing. The electrolysis procedure I do is a negatively charged cell, meaning I only use short periods of the positive on a 12 volt 2 amp with my battery charger or in my truck battery. By using electrolysis and leaving a negative on it disturbs the covalent bonds in the water and not only makes HHO but ions held stable on my cathode.

I have doubled my fuel mileage because of this negative fuel cell, if one wants to look it up they can look up the Joe cell.

I now have a new hypothesis about superconductors, I believe that my removing the electrons and creating ions in semi large amounts will draw electrons from the surrounding materials of the superconductor as well as from the atmosphere.

This explains the eases heat that Ponds and Flishman have found and thousands of other scientists now. I am not scientist and some times I thank God when trying to explain this to people that think they know every thing already.

To understand what I am saying you have to dismantle your current beliefs of the electrical processes. You notice how they do not explain electron loss in our current theory of electricity? They don’t explain it because they can’t.

They tell us it is a closed system that say pushes the electrons along to give us electricity, and they tell us we lose some from heat loss and accidental wires busting from branches falling on it, but these systems last for years and years and years. If any one takes the time to think about this they will understand what I am talking about.

Now I will attempt to explain how I think it works and why I suspect that in the near future they will find over unity energy from doping electrons and creating ions that have superconducting properties.

Yes we do have electron loss and that should tell us that these generating systems should need regular replacing, but how often do we see electrical lines being replaced? It is the generators themselves that extract electrons from the swirling air inside the generator.

We know no that electrons are extremely easy to remove from hydrogen and oxygen witch i said years ago as well. The high voltage from water drops tells us this, as well as the new X-rays from scotch tape that releases tremendous amounts of electrons.

So ask your self why then inside a generator it can not eject electrons due to the high spin and add them to the close copper wire?

So I suspect in the near future we will see larger superconductors that will draw there own negative current from the surrounding aria by positively charged ions in the superconductor.

Cheers all.

Scott.

By compressing hydrogen to form a superconductor they are just ejecting electrons as well.

I also stated almost 2 years ago that I bet the freezing Merle just slowed down the electron flow in the superconducting material making it super conduct, they can now view that it does indeed slow down the electrons.

I have worked with monatomic hydrogen that is a room temperature superconductor that does not need compressing. The electrolysis procedure I do is a negatively charged cell, meaning I only use short periods of the positive on a 12 volt 2 amp with my battery charger or in my truck battery. By using electrolysis and leaving a negative on it disturbs the covalent bonds in the water and not only makes HHO but ions held stable on my cathode.

I have doubled my fuel mileage because of this negative fuel cell, if one wants to look it up they can look up the Joe cell.

I now have a new hypothesis about superconductors, I believe that my removing the electrons and creating ions in semi large amounts will draw electrons from the surrounding materials of the superconductor as well as from the atmosphere.

This explains the eases heat that Ponds and Flishman have found and thousands of other scientists now. I am not scientist and some times I thank God when trying to explain this to people that think they know every thing already.

To understand what I am saying you have to dismantle your current beliefs of the electrical processes. You notice how they do not explain electron loss in our current theory of electricity? They don’t explain it because they can’t.

They tell us it is a closed system that say pushes the electrons along to give us electricity, and they tell us we lose some from heat loss and accidental wires busting from branches falling on it, but these systems last for years and years and years. If any one takes the time to think about this they will understand what I am talking about.

Now I will attempt to explain how I think it works and why I suspect that in the near future they will find over unity energy from doping electrons and creating ions that have superconducting properties.

Yes we do have electron loss and that should tell us that these generating systems should need regular replacing, but how often do we see electrical lines being replaced? It is the generators themselves that extract electrons from the swirling air inside the generator.

We know no that electrons are extremely easy to remove from hydrogen and oxygen witch i said years ago as well. The high voltage from water drops tells us this, as well as the new X-rays from scotch tape that releases tremendous amounts of electrons.

So ask your self why then inside a generator it can not eject electrons due to the high spin and add them to the close copper wire?

So I suspect in the near future we will see larger superconductors that will draw there own negative current from the surrounding aria by positively charged ions in the superconductor.

Cheers all.

Scott.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-03/iop-tfo032608.php

I hope these inventions make it to the market before any one of us dies. Otherwise it would be useful for the future generations excluding us.

This was the one of the articles which I read from top to bottom and every word.

Great work!

I hope these inventions make it to the market before any one of us dies. Otherwise it would be useful for the future generations excluding us.

This was the one of the articles which I read from top to bottom and every word.

Great work!

http://www.scienceonline.org/cgi/data/319/5869/1506/DC1/1