New (Super)Conductors on the Horizon?
What if computers didn’t get hot and batteries never lost their battery life? What if you could help power your car with the heat of its engine? Conducting electricity from one point to another, and then putting it to good use, is one of the linchpins of our modern lives. The materials that make transporting and storing energy are called conductors, and their ability to conduct is a major hurtle in the quest for energy efficiency. The better your wires, circuit boards, and silicon conduct, the more bang you get for your buck. So no wonder when a breakthrough comes along, some of us get excited. This week, two breakthroughs have the potential to shake things up for the industry.
First, let’s travel all the way back to high school physics class and remember what conducting is all about. When we talk about electricity, we’re really talking about electrons and controlling their movement through matter. In materials that conduct (like copper), all the little electrons are not strictly attached to their protons - they can float around, move in clumps or waves, or just spread out evenly. That’s why electricity is said to “travel” through a copper wire - with direct current, the electrons actually travel. So even though “money makes the world go ’round”, these days cold hard cash is transferred electronically around the globe. Conducting materials, like copper, make it possible. But not all matter is made equal; some things conduct better than others. For more more in depth review and explanations of voltage, amps, and ohms, check out Wikipedia.
Resistivity is the word that describes how well (or poorly) a material conducts electricity. When it comes to conducting, the less resistance the better. When resistance does occur, normally the energy is wasted as heat. That’s why computers get hot and require fans: resistance of electricity through silicon. With less resistivity, or even no resistivity, electrons can travel farther, deliver more energy on arrival, and reduce the amount of electricity we need for any (every) given task. We’re talking energy efficiency on steroids. Now you know why when there’s been a breakthrough in conductor technology, it’s a big deal.
Superconductors have no resistance, which means electrons can travel through them almost forever. The uses for superconductor technology are futuristic and exciting, but superconductors require special circumstances to work. Extremely hot or cold temperatures, which require a lot of energy, were required… until recently.
Advances in Conductor Technology
The first breakthrough comes to us from Boston College and MIT, where scientists have crushed a common semiconductor into tiny bits and used nanotechnology to put it back together again, but better. Now their new product conducts electricity but 40% less heat than normal conductors. Heat has always been a problem because in most conductors, heat and electricity go hand-in-hand, and the hotter many materials (like silicon) get, the less efficient they become. The new product is inexpensive and scalable to industrial sizes, and could be used to cool electronics or generate electricity from heat. Cleaner, more efficient refrigerators, cars, and solar panels (just to name a few) could result from the breakthrough. They could help power cars or factories with their own generated heat. The scientists, Zhifeng Ren and Gang Chen, will share a patent and license the technology to their start-up company GMZ Energy. Congrats to them on taking an existing technology and finding a new technique to improve it! Can you think of any other applications for this technology? Leave a comment and share your good ideas.
The second, equally exciting breakthrough: in frosty Canada a team of scientists have created a new superconductor material that performs at room temperature. By compressing materials under intense pressure, they have removed the necessity for extreme temperatures. Their findings have huge implications for anything that uses electricity. Superconductors are “super” because they waste less than 1% of the electricity that passes through them. If they become affordable and available, energy efficiency could dramatically improve for anything that needs power. Applications in the computer industry alone could revolutionize our electronics. Though this technology will probably not be readily available, it’s certainly exciting news. Superconductors are not widely used today in part because of the cost to build and maintain them, but also because of certain health and environmental factors. Superconductors can create strong magnetic fields and radio frequency energy that can harm people and wildlife. Obviously the technology must be safe in context of its use. What are your thoughts on superconductors?
As an environmentalist, I do have a few questions on my mind. Will the benefits of these technologies outweigh the cost of their production? If so, would it be possible to retrofit existing technology to benefit? And who would lend a hand towards using the technology to its fullest potential? If I find any answers, I’ll certainly write an update.
(Image courtesy of Next Energy News)








I love your post! You somehow made a confusing and boring topic (at least to me) quite interesting.
Wow, glad you like it! I was worried about the yawn-factor when I started doing research.
Here’s a link to part of the published scientific paper.
http://www.scienceonline.org/cgi/data/319/5869/1506/DC1/1
Great research!
I hope these inventions make it to the market before any one of us dies. Otherwise it would be useful for the future generations excluding us.
This was the one of the articles which I read from top to bottom and every word.
Great work!
More information about the future of computers, including superconductors. This is what gets a physicist out of bed everyday:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-03/iop-tfo032608.php
[...] superconductor news. [...]
Hello, great article, I am just about to search for over unity in superconductors, I said over 2 years ago that removing electrons from atoms will make a room temperature superconductor, they now dope them removing some electrons.
By compressing hydrogen to form a superconductor they are just ejecting electrons as well.
I also stated almost 2 years ago that I bet the freezing Merle just slowed down the electron flow in the superconducting material making it super conduct, they can now view that it does indeed slow down the electrons.
I have worked with monatomic hydrogen that is a room temperature superconductor that does not need compressing. The electrolysis procedure I do is a negatively charged cell, meaning I only use short periods of the positive on a 12 volt 2 amp with my battery charger or in my truck battery. By using electrolysis and leaving a negative on it disturbs the covalent bonds in the water and not only makes HHO but ions held stable on my cathode.
I have doubled my fuel mileage because of this negative fuel cell, if one wants to look it up they can look up the Joe cell.
I now have a new hypothesis about superconductors, I believe that my removing the electrons and creating ions in semi large amounts will draw electrons from the surrounding materials of the superconductor as well as from the atmosphere.
This explains the eases heat that Ponds and Flishman have found and thousands of other scientists now. I am not scientist and some times I thank God when trying to explain this to people that think they know every thing already.
To understand what I am saying you have to dismantle your current beliefs of the electrical processes. You notice how they do not explain electron loss in our current theory of electricity? They don’t explain it because they can’t.
They tell us it is a closed system that say pushes the electrons along to give us electricity, and they tell us we lose some from heat loss and accidental wires busting from branches falling on it, but these systems last for years and years and years. If any one takes the time to think about this they will understand what I am talking about.
Now I will attempt to explain how I think it works and why I suspect that in the near future they will find over unity energy from doping electrons and creating ions that have superconducting properties.
Yes we do have electron loss and that should tell us that these generating systems should need regular replacing, but how often do we see electrical lines being replaced? It is the generators themselves that extract electrons from the swirling air inside the generator.
We know no that electrons are extremely easy to remove from hydrogen and oxygen witch i said years ago as well. The high voltage from water drops tells us this, as well as the new X-rays from scotch tape that releases tremendous amounts of electrons.
So ask your self why then inside a generator it can not eject electrons due to the high spin and add them to the close copper wire?
So I suspect in the near future we will see larger superconductors that will draw there own negative current from the surrounding aria by positively charged ions in the superconductor.
Cheers all.
Scott.